住院病人直接口服抗凝药物相互作用的管理。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1007/s11239-024-02967-2
Mohsen H Al Zaria, Leo F Buckley, Heather Dell'orfano, Peter Manzo, John Fanikos
{"title":"住院病人直接口服抗凝药物相互作用的管理。","authors":"Mohsen H Al Zaria, Leo F Buckley, Heather Dell'orfano, Peter Manzo, John Fanikos","doi":"10.1007/s11239-024-02967-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moderate-strong CYP3A4 or Pgp inhibitors and inducers alter direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacokinetics. Whether the presence of a DOAC drug-drug interaction (DDI) prompts in- hospital changes in management remains unknown. We identified all hospitalized patients at our institution who were admitted with a clinically relevant DOAC DDI from 01/2021 to 06/2021. Clinically relevant DOAC DDIs were defined as those listed in the prescribing information or FDA CYP3A4/Pgp inhibitors clinical indexes. We assessed the prevalence of DOAC DDIs and categorized their management as: drug stopped, drug held, or drug continued. For drugs that were continued we assessed whether the dose of the DOAC or interacting drug was increased, decreased or unchanged during the admission. We ascertained the number of DOAC DDIs that prompted an automated prescribing alert in our electronic health record (EHR). Finally, we conducted a logistic regression model to compare users of DOACs with DDI who had their regimen adjusted versus those without adjustments, focusing on outcomes of rehospitalization and death, adjusting for age and gender. Among 3,725 hospitalizations with a DOAC admission order, 197 (5%) had a clinically relevant DOAC DDI. The DOAC and the interacting drug were continued at discharge for 124 (63%) hospitalizations. The most frequent adjustments were stopping the interacting drug (73%) and stopping the DOAC (15%). Only 7 (4%) of DOAC DDIs prompted an EHR alert. The adjusted odds ratios for rehospitalizations and death, respectively, among patients whose regimens were adjusted compared to those whose were not, were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) and 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09). Clinically relevant DDIs with DOACs occur infrequently among hospitalized patients and usually are managed without stopping the DOAC. The clinical impact of such DDIs and subsequent adjustments on thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"598-602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of direct oral anticoagulant drug interactions in hospitalized patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen H Al Zaria, Leo F Buckley, Heather Dell'orfano, Peter Manzo, John Fanikos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-024-02967-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Moderate-strong CYP3A4 or Pgp inhibitors and inducers alter direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacokinetics. Whether the presence of a DOAC drug-drug interaction (DDI) prompts in- hospital changes in management remains unknown. We identified all hospitalized patients at our institution who were admitted with a clinically relevant DOAC DDI from 01/2021 to 06/2021. Clinically relevant DOAC DDIs were defined as those listed in the prescribing information or FDA CYP3A4/Pgp inhibitors clinical indexes. We assessed the prevalence of DOAC DDIs and categorized their management as: drug stopped, drug held, or drug continued. For drugs that were continued we assessed whether the dose of the DOAC or interacting drug was increased, decreased or unchanged during the admission. We ascertained the number of DOAC DDIs that prompted an automated prescribing alert in our electronic health record (EHR). Finally, we conducted a logistic regression model to compare users of DOACs with DDI who had their regimen adjusted versus those without adjustments, focusing on outcomes of rehospitalization and death, adjusting for age and gender. Among 3,725 hospitalizations with a DOAC admission order, 197 (5%) had a clinically relevant DOAC DDI. The DOAC and the interacting drug were continued at discharge for 124 (63%) hospitalizations. The most frequent adjustments were stopping the interacting drug (73%) and stopping the DOAC (15%). Only 7 (4%) of DOAC DDIs prompted an EHR alert. The adjusted odds ratios for rehospitalizations and death, respectively, among patients whose regimens were adjusted compared to those whose were not, were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) and 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09). Clinically relevant DDIs with DOACs occur infrequently among hospitalized patients and usually are managed without stopping the DOAC. The clinical impact of such DDIs and subsequent adjustments on thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes requires further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"598-602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02967-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02967-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中强 CYP3A4 或 Pgp 抑制剂和诱导剂会改变直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的药代动力学。DOAC药物间相互作用(DDI)的存在是否会促使医院改变治疗方案仍是未知数。我们确定了本院在 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间因临床相关的 DOAC DDI 而入院的所有住院患者。临床相关的 DOAC DDI 被定义为处方信息或 FDA CYP3A4/Pgp 抑制剂临床索引中列出的药物。我们评估了 DOAC DDIs 的发生率,并将其管理分为:停药、暂缓用药或继续用药。对于继续使用的药物,我们评估了入院期间 DOAC 或相互作用药物的剂量是否增加、减少或不变。我们确定了在电子病历 (EHR) 中触发自动处方警报的 DOAC DDI 的数量。最后,我们建立了一个逻辑回归模型,对调整了用药方案的 DOAC DDI 使用者和未调整方案的 DOAC DDI 使用者进行比较,重点关注再住院和死亡的结果,并对年龄和性别进行了调整。在有 DOAC 入院医嘱的 3,725 例住院患者中,197 例(5%)有临床相关的 DOAC DDI。124例(63%)住院患者在出院时继续使用DOAC和相互作用药物。最常见的调整是停用相互作用药物(73%)和停用 DOAC(15%)。只有 7 例(4%)DOAC DDI 引发了电子病历警报。与未调整治疗方案的患者相比,调整治疗方案的患者再次住院和死亡的几率分别为 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) 和 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09)。在住院患者中,与 DOAC 相关的临床 DDI 并不常见,通常无需停用 DOAC 即可解决。此类 DDIs 的临床影响以及随后的调整对血栓和出血结果的影响还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of direct oral anticoagulant drug interactions in hospitalized patients.

Moderate-strong CYP3A4 or Pgp inhibitors and inducers alter direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacokinetics. Whether the presence of a DOAC drug-drug interaction (DDI) prompts in- hospital changes in management remains unknown. We identified all hospitalized patients at our institution who were admitted with a clinically relevant DOAC DDI from 01/2021 to 06/2021. Clinically relevant DOAC DDIs were defined as those listed in the prescribing information or FDA CYP3A4/Pgp inhibitors clinical indexes. We assessed the prevalence of DOAC DDIs and categorized their management as: drug stopped, drug held, or drug continued. For drugs that were continued we assessed whether the dose of the DOAC or interacting drug was increased, decreased or unchanged during the admission. We ascertained the number of DOAC DDIs that prompted an automated prescribing alert in our electronic health record (EHR). Finally, we conducted a logistic regression model to compare users of DOACs with DDI who had their regimen adjusted versus those without adjustments, focusing on outcomes of rehospitalization and death, adjusting for age and gender. Among 3,725 hospitalizations with a DOAC admission order, 197 (5%) had a clinically relevant DOAC DDI. The DOAC and the interacting drug were continued at discharge for 124 (63%) hospitalizations. The most frequent adjustments were stopping the interacting drug (73%) and stopping the DOAC (15%). Only 7 (4%) of DOAC DDIs prompted an EHR alert. The adjusted odds ratios for rehospitalizations and death, respectively, among patients whose regimens were adjusted compared to those whose were not, were 1.29 (95% CI, 0.67 to 2.48; P = 0.44) and 1.88 (95% CI, 0.91 to 3.89; P = 0.09). Clinically relevant DDIs with DOACs occur infrequently among hospitalized patients and usually are managed without stopping the DOAC. The clinical impact of such DDIs and subsequent adjustments on thrombotic and hemorrhagic outcomes requires further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信