内部文化在森林管理中应对不确定性的作用

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Peter Deegen
{"title":"内部文化在森林管理中应对不确定性的作用","authors":"Peter Deegen","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Theories about uncertainty usually focus on its reduction. However, a significant source of uncertainty lies in the innovative and creative capabilities of the human mind. This particular source entangles us in contradictions: both reducing and creating uncertainty simultaneously. Therefore, a theory of uncertainty that solely investigates ways to reduce it is incomplete. It must be complemented by aspects of how uncertainty contributes the betterment of people.</p><p>In our study, we establish a foundation for extending the theory of uncertainty in five steps. Drawing on the insights of William A. Duerr and Jean B. Duerr, who assert that faith, rather than measureable facts, guides forest resource management under uncertainty, we concentrate our analysis on informal institutions, customs, traditions etc.</p><p>Firstly, we reconstruct the evolution of the internal culture of forestry. Secondly, we delineate the bourgeois culture and compare it with the internal culture of forestry. Thirdly, we develop a theoretical approach to the re-valuation of uncertainty. Fourthly, we combine the theoretical approach with a historical analysis of the Great Enrichment to provide a comprehensive understanding of an overall picture how people re-valuated uncertainty. This involves placing higher value on the chances of self-induced unforeseen changes higher than on the associated dangers. Finally, we summarize our findings and close the paper with suggestions for future research on the extension of a theory of uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of internal culture for coping with uncertainty in forest management\",\"authors\":\"Peter Deegen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Theories about uncertainty usually focus on its reduction. However, a significant source of uncertainty lies in the innovative and creative capabilities of the human mind. This particular source entangles us in contradictions: both reducing and creating uncertainty simultaneously. Therefore, a theory of uncertainty that solely investigates ways to reduce it is incomplete. It must be complemented by aspects of how uncertainty contributes the betterment of people.</p><p>In our study, we establish a foundation for extending the theory of uncertainty in five steps. Drawing on the insights of William A. Duerr and Jean B. Duerr, who assert that faith, rather than measureable facts, guides forest resource management under uncertainty, we concentrate our analysis on informal institutions, customs, traditions etc.</p><p>Firstly, we reconstruct the evolution of the internal culture of forestry. Secondly, we delineate the bourgeois culture and compare it with the internal culture of forestry. Thirdly, we develop a theoretical approach to the re-valuation of uncertainty. Fourthly, we combine the theoretical approach with a historical analysis of the Great Enrichment to provide a comprehensive understanding of an overall picture how people re-valuated uncertainty. This involves placing higher value on the chances of self-induced unforeseen changes higher than on the associated dangers. Finally, we summarize our findings and close the paper with suggestions for future research on the extension of a theory of uncertainty.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于不确定性的理论通常侧重于减少不确定性。然而,不确定性的一个重要来源在于人类思维的创新和创造能力。这一特殊来源使我们陷入矛盾之中:既减少不确定性,又制造不确定性。因此,仅仅研究如何减少不确定性的理论是不完整的。在我们的研究中,我们分五个步骤为扩展不确定性理论奠定了基础。威廉-杜尔(William A. Duerr)和让-杜尔(Jean B. Duerr)认为,在不确定性条件下,指导森林资源管理的是信念,而不是可测量的事实,我们借鉴了他们的见解,将分析重点放在非正式制度、习俗、传统等方面。其次,我们划分资产阶级文化,并将其与林业内部文化进行比较。第三,我们提出了重新评价不确定性的理论方法。第四,我们将这一理论方法与 "大丰富 "的历史分析相结合,以全面了解人们如何重新评估不确定性的整体情况。这包括对自我引发的不可预见变化的可能性给予更高的评价,而不是对相关的危险给予更高的评价。最后,我们总结了我们的研究结果,并在本文的最后提出了关于未来扩展不确定性理论研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of internal culture for coping with uncertainty in forest management

Theories about uncertainty usually focus on its reduction. However, a significant source of uncertainty lies in the innovative and creative capabilities of the human mind. This particular source entangles us in contradictions: both reducing and creating uncertainty simultaneously. Therefore, a theory of uncertainty that solely investigates ways to reduce it is incomplete. It must be complemented by aspects of how uncertainty contributes the betterment of people.

In our study, we establish a foundation for extending the theory of uncertainty in five steps. Drawing on the insights of William A. Duerr and Jean B. Duerr, who assert that faith, rather than measureable facts, guides forest resource management under uncertainty, we concentrate our analysis on informal institutions, customs, traditions etc.

Firstly, we reconstruct the evolution of the internal culture of forestry. Secondly, we delineate the bourgeois culture and compare it with the internal culture of forestry. Thirdly, we develop a theoretical approach to the re-valuation of uncertainty. Fourthly, we combine the theoretical approach with a historical analysis of the Great Enrichment to provide a comprehensive understanding of an overall picture how people re-valuated uncertainty. This involves placing higher value on the chances of self-induced unforeseen changes higher than on the associated dangers. Finally, we summarize our findings and close the paper with suggestions for future research on the extension of a theory of uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信