几乎按比例分配不可分割的家务:计算、近似和效率

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Haris Aziz , Bo Li , Hervé Moulin , Xiaowei Wu , Xinran Zhu
{"title":"几乎按比例分配不可分割的家务:计算、近似和效率","authors":"Haris Aziz ,&nbsp;Bo Li ,&nbsp;Hervé Moulin ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Wu ,&nbsp;Xinran Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Proportionality (PROP) is one of the simplest and most intuitive fairness criteria used for allocating items among agents with additive utilities. However, when the items are indivisible, ensuring PROP becomes unattainable, leading to increased focus on its relaxations. In this paper, we focus on the relaxation of proportionality up to any item (PROPX), where proportionality is satisfied if an arbitrary item is removed from every agent's allocation. We show that PROPX is an appealing fairness notion for the allocation of indivisible chores, which approximately implies some share-based notions, such as maximin share (MMS) and AnyPrice share (APS). We further provide a comprehensive understanding of PROPX allocations, regarding the computation, approximation, and compatibility with efficiency. On top of these, we extend the study to scenarios where agents do not share equal liability towards the chores, and approximate PROPX allocations using partial information about agents' utilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8434,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Almost proportional allocations of indivisible chores: Computation, approximation and efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Haris Aziz ,&nbsp;Bo Li ,&nbsp;Hervé Moulin ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Wu ,&nbsp;Xinran Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.artint.2024.104118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Proportionality (PROP) is one of the simplest and most intuitive fairness criteria used for allocating items among agents with additive utilities. However, when the items are indivisible, ensuring PROP becomes unattainable, leading to increased focus on its relaxations. In this paper, we focus on the relaxation of proportionality up to any item (PROPX), where proportionality is satisfied if an arbitrary item is removed from every agent's allocation. We show that PROPX is an appealing fairness notion for the allocation of indivisible chores, which approximately implies some share-based notions, such as maximin share (MMS) and AnyPrice share (APS). We further provide a comprehensive understanding of PROPX allocations, regarding the computation, approximation, and compatibility with efficiency. On top of these, we extend the study to scenarios where agents do not share equal liability towards the chores, and approximate PROPX allocations using partial information about agents' utilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000547\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0004370224000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比例性(PROP)是最简单、最直观的公平标准之一,用于在具有加法效用的代理人之间分配物品。然而,当物品不可分割时,确保 PROP 就变得难以实现,这导致人们越来越关注其松弛问题。在本文中,我们将重点放在任意项目的比例性松弛(PROPX)上,在这种情况下,如果从每个代理的分配中移除一个任意项目,比例性就会得到满足。我们证明,PROPX 是不可分割家务分配的一个有吸引力的公平概念,它近似地暗示了一些基于份额的概念,如最大化份额(MMS)和任意价格份额(APS)。我们还进一步全面地了解了 PROPX 分配的计算、近似性和与效率的兼容性。在此基础上,我们将研究扩展到代理人对家务不承担同等责任的情况,并利用代理人效用的部分信息对 PROPX 分配进行近似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Almost proportional allocations of indivisible chores: Computation, approximation and efficiency

Proportionality (PROP) is one of the simplest and most intuitive fairness criteria used for allocating items among agents with additive utilities. However, when the items are indivisible, ensuring PROP becomes unattainable, leading to increased focus on its relaxations. In this paper, we focus on the relaxation of proportionality up to any item (PROPX), where proportionality is satisfied if an arbitrary item is removed from every agent's allocation. We show that PROPX is an appealing fairness notion for the allocation of indivisible chores, which approximately implies some share-based notions, such as maximin share (MMS) and AnyPrice share (APS). We further provide a comprehensive understanding of PROPX allocations, regarding the computation, approximation, and compatibility with efficiency. On top of these, we extend the study to scenarios where agents do not share equal liability towards the chores, and approximate PROPX allocations using partial information about agents' utilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Artificial Intelligence (AIJ) welcomes papers covering a broad spectrum of AI topics, including cognition, automated reasoning, computer vision, machine learning, and more. Papers should demonstrate advancements in AI and propose innovative approaches to AI problems. Additionally, the journal accepts papers describing AI applications, focusing on how new methods enhance performance rather than reiterating conventional approaches. In addition to regular papers, AIJ also accepts Research Notes, Research Field Reviews, Position Papers, Book Reviews, and summary papers on AI challenges and competitions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信