狼疮肾炎自身抗体的批判性观点:基于证据的具体知识。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Maurizio Bruschi , Andrea Angeletti , Marco Prunotto , Pier Luigi Meroni , Gian Marco Ghiggeri , for the Zeus consortium, Gabriella Moroni , Renato Alberto Sinico , Franco Franceschini , Micaela Fredi , Augusto Vaglio , Andrea Cavalli , Leonardo Scapozza , Jigar J. Patel , John C. Tan , Ken C. Lo , Lorenzo Cavagna , Andrea Petretto , Federico Pratesi , Paola Migliorini , Enrico Verrina
{"title":"狼疮肾炎自身抗体的批判性观点:基于证据的具体知识。","authors":"Maurizio Bruschi ,&nbsp;Andrea Angeletti ,&nbsp;Marco Prunotto ,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Meroni ,&nbsp;Gian Marco Ghiggeri ,&nbsp;for the Zeus consortium,&nbsp;Gabriella Moroni ,&nbsp;Renato Alberto Sinico ,&nbsp;Franco Franceschini ,&nbsp;Micaela Fredi ,&nbsp;Augusto Vaglio ,&nbsp;Andrea Cavalli ,&nbsp;Leonardo Scapozza ,&nbsp;Jigar J. Patel ,&nbsp;John C. Tan ,&nbsp;Ken C. Lo ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cavagna ,&nbsp;Andrea Petretto ,&nbsp;Federico Pratesi ,&nbsp;Paola Migliorini ,&nbsp;Enrico Verrina","doi":"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deposition of autoantibodies in glomeruli is a key factor in the development of lupus nephritis (LN). For a long time, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were thought to be the main cause of the kidney damage. However, recent studies have shown that the list of autoantibidies that have renal tropism and deposit in the kidney in LN is increasing and the link between anti-dsDNA and renal pathology is weak due to potential confounders. Aspecific bindings of dsDNA with cationic antibodies and of anti-dsDNA with several renal antigens such as actinin, laminin, entactin, and annexinA2 raised doubts about the specific target of these antibodies in the kidney. Moreover, the isotype of anti-dsDNA in SLE and LN has never received adequate interest until the recent observation that IgG2 are preponderant over IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4.</p><p>Based on the above background, recent studies investigated the involvement of anti-dsDNA IgG2 and of other antibodies in LN. It was concluded that circulating anti-dsDNA IgG2 levels do not distinguish between LN versus non-renal SLE, and, in patients with LN, their levels do not change over time. Circulating levels of other antibodies such as anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 were, instead, higher in LN vs non-renal SLE at the time of diagnosis and decreased following therapies. Finally, new classes of renal antibodies that potentially modify the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney are emerging as new co-actors in the pathogenetic scenario. They have been defined as ‘second wave antibodies’ for the link with detoxifying mechanisms limiting the oxidative stress in glomeruli that are classically stimulated in a second phase of inflammation.</p><p>These findings have important clinical implications that may modify the laboratory approach to LN. Serum levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 should be measured in the follow up of patients for designing the length of therapies and identify those patients who respond to treatments. Anti-SOD2 could help to monitor and potentiate the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8664,"journal":{"name":"Autoimmunity reviews","volume":"23 5","pages":"Article 103535"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical view on autoantibodies in lupus nephritis: Concrete knowledge based on evidence\",\"authors\":\"Maurizio Bruschi ,&nbsp;Andrea Angeletti ,&nbsp;Marco Prunotto ,&nbsp;Pier Luigi Meroni ,&nbsp;Gian Marco Ghiggeri ,&nbsp;for the Zeus consortium,&nbsp;Gabriella Moroni ,&nbsp;Renato Alberto Sinico ,&nbsp;Franco Franceschini ,&nbsp;Micaela Fredi ,&nbsp;Augusto Vaglio ,&nbsp;Andrea Cavalli ,&nbsp;Leonardo Scapozza ,&nbsp;Jigar J. Patel ,&nbsp;John C. Tan ,&nbsp;Ken C. Lo ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Cavagna ,&nbsp;Andrea Petretto ,&nbsp;Federico Pratesi ,&nbsp;Paola Migliorini ,&nbsp;Enrico Verrina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autrev.2024.103535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Deposition of autoantibodies in glomeruli is a key factor in the development of lupus nephritis (LN). For a long time, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were thought to be the main cause of the kidney damage. However, recent studies have shown that the list of autoantibidies that have renal tropism and deposit in the kidney in LN is increasing and the link between anti-dsDNA and renal pathology is weak due to potential confounders. Aspecific bindings of dsDNA with cationic antibodies and of anti-dsDNA with several renal antigens such as actinin, laminin, entactin, and annexinA2 raised doubts about the specific target of these antibodies in the kidney. Moreover, the isotype of anti-dsDNA in SLE and LN has never received adequate interest until the recent observation that IgG2 are preponderant over IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4.</p><p>Based on the above background, recent studies investigated the involvement of anti-dsDNA IgG2 and of other antibodies in LN. It was concluded that circulating anti-dsDNA IgG2 levels do not distinguish between LN versus non-renal SLE, and, in patients with LN, their levels do not change over time. Circulating levels of other antibodies such as anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 were, instead, higher in LN vs non-renal SLE at the time of diagnosis and decreased following therapies. Finally, new classes of renal antibodies that potentially modify the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney are emerging as new co-actors in the pathogenetic scenario. They have been defined as ‘second wave antibodies’ for the link with detoxifying mechanisms limiting the oxidative stress in glomeruli that are classically stimulated in a second phase of inflammation.</p><p>These findings have important clinical implications that may modify the laboratory approach to LN. Serum levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 should be measured in the follow up of patients for designing the length of therapies and identify those patients who respond to treatments. Anti-SOD2 could help to monitor and potentiate the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 103535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autoimmunity reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224000260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autoimmunity reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568997224000260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自身抗体在肾小球的沉积是狼疮肾炎(LN)发病的关键因素。长期以来,抗dsDNA和抗C1q抗体被认为是肾脏损伤的主要原因。然而,最近的研究表明,在狼疮性肾炎患者中,具有肾脏滋养特性并沉积于肾脏的自身抗体越来越多,而由于潜在的混杂因素,抗dsDNA与肾脏病理之间的联系很弱。dsDNA与阳离子抗体的特异性结合,以及抗dsDNA与多种肾脏抗原(如肌动蛋白、层粘连蛋白、entactin和annexinA2)的特异性结合,使人对这些抗体在肾脏中的特异性靶点产生怀疑。此外,系统性红斑狼疮和 LN 中抗dsDNA 的同种型一直没有引起足够的重视,直到最近发现 IgG2 比 IgG1、IgG3 和 IgG4 占优势。基于上述背景,最近的研究调查了抗dsDNA IgG2和其他抗体在LN中的参与情况。研究得出的结论是,循环中的抗dsDNA IgG2水平并不能区分LN和非肾性系统性红斑狼疮,而且在LN患者中,其水平不会随着时间的推移而改变。相反,其他抗体如抗ENO1和抗H2 IgG2的循环水平在LN和非肾性系统性红斑狼疮诊断时较高,在接受治疗后下降。最后,有可能改变肾脏抗炎反应的新型肾脏抗体正在成为新的致病因素。它们被定义为 "第二波抗体",因为它们与限制肾小球氧化应激的解毒机制有联系,而这种机制在炎症的第二阶段通常会受到刺激。这些发现具有重要的临床意义,可能会改变实验室检测 LN 的方法。在对患者进行随访时,应测量血清中抗 ENO1 和抗 H2 IgG2 的水平,以设计治疗时间的长短,并确定对治疗有反应的患者。抗 SOD2 有助于监测和增强肾脏的抗炎反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical view on autoantibodies in lupus nephritis: Concrete knowledge based on evidence

Deposition of autoantibodies in glomeruli is a key factor in the development of lupus nephritis (LN). For a long time, anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q antibodies were thought to be the main cause of the kidney damage. However, recent studies have shown that the list of autoantibidies that have renal tropism and deposit in the kidney in LN is increasing and the link between anti-dsDNA and renal pathology is weak due to potential confounders. Aspecific bindings of dsDNA with cationic antibodies and of anti-dsDNA with several renal antigens such as actinin, laminin, entactin, and annexinA2 raised doubts about the specific target of these antibodies in the kidney. Moreover, the isotype of anti-dsDNA in SLE and LN has never received adequate interest until the recent observation that IgG2 are preponderant over IgG1, IgG3 and IgG4.

Based on the above background, recent studies investigated the involvement of anti-dsDNA IgG2 and of other antibodies in LN. It was concluded that circulating anti-dsDNA IgG2 levels do not distinguish between LN versus non-renal SLE, and, in patients with LN, their levels do not change over time. Circulating levels of other antibodies such as anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 were, instead, higher in LN vs non-renal SLE at the time of diagnosis and decreased following therapies. Finally, new classes of renal antibodies that potentially modify the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney are emerging as new co-actors in the pathogenetic scenario. They have been defined as ‘second wave antibodies’ for the link with detoxifying mechanisms limiting the oxidative stress in glomeruli that are classically stimulated in a second phase of inflammation.

These findings have important clinical implications that may modify the laboratory approach to LN. Serum levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2 IgG2 should be measured in the follow up of patients for designing the length of therapies and identify those patients who respond to treatments. Anti-SOD2 could help to monitor and potentiate the anti-inflammatory response in the kidney.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autoimmunity reviews
Autoimmunity reviews 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
24.70
自引率
4.40%
发文量
164
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Autoimmunity Reviews is a publication that features up-to-date, structured reviews on various topics in the field of autoimmunity. These reviews are written by renowned experts and include demonstrative illustrations and tables. Each article will have a clear "take-home" message for readers. The selection of articles is primarily done by the Editors-in-Chief, based on recommendations from the international Editorial Board. The topics covered in the articles span all areas of autoimmunology, aiming to bridge the gap between basic and clinical sciences. In terms of content, the contributions in basic sciences delve into the pathophysiology and mechanisms of autoimmune disorders, as well as genomics and proteomics. On the other hand, clinical contributions focus on diseases related to autoimmunity, novel therapies, and clinical associations. Autoimmunity Reviews is internationally recognized, and its articles are indexed and abstracted in prestigious databases such as PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Biosciences Information Services, and Chemical Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信