利用人工智能预测遗体捐献者肾移植结果,辅助肾脏分配决策。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190
Hatem Ali, Mahmoud Mohamed, Miklos Z Molnar, Tibor Fülöp, Bernard Burke, Arun Shroff, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan
{"title":"利用人工智能预测遗体捐献者肾移植结果,辅助肾脏分配决策。","authors":"Hatem Ali, Mahmoud Mohamed, Miklos Z Molnar, Tibor Fülöp, Bernard Burke, Arun Shroff, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"808-818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation.\",\"authors\":\"Hatem Ali, Mahmoud Mohamed, Miklos Z Molnar, Tibor Fülöp, Bernard Burke, Arun Shroff, Sunil Shroff, David Briggs, Nithya Krishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"808-818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在肾移植中,将寿命最长的受者与低风险的同种异体移植物配对以优化移植物-供体存活率是一项复杂的挑战。目前的风险预测模型显示出有限的判别和校准能力,而且尚未与现代辅助决策工具进行比较。我们的目标是利用人工智能(AI)技术开发一种高度准确的风险分级指数。利用 UNOS 数据库的数据(2007-2021 年,156749 例死亡肾移植),我们将移植随机分为训练集(80%)和验证集(20%)。主要衡量指标是死亡删失的移植存活率。与现有模型相比,我们评估了四个机器学习模型的校准性(综合布赖尔评分 [IBS])和鉴别性(时间相关一致性指数 [CTD])。我们使用英国移植数据进行了决策曲线分析和外部验证。深度 Cox 混合模型显示出最佳的判别性能(移植后 6 年、9 年和 12 年的曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.66、0.67 和 0.68),CTD 为 0.66。校准是适当的(IBS = 0.12),而肾脏捐献者特征指数(KDPI)模型的 CTD(0.59)和 AUC(0.60)较低。在根据移植物存活率评估移植配对方面,基于人工智能的D-TOP优于KDPI,从而有可能加强对死亡供体的选择。先进的计算技术有望影响肾脏分配方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence to Aid Decision-Making in Kidney Allocation.

In kidney transplantation, pairing recipients with the highest longevity with low-risk allografts to optimize graft-donor survival is a complex challenge. Current risk prediction models exhibit limited discriminative and calibration capabilities and have not been compared to modern decision-assisting tools. We aimed to develop a highly accurate risk-stratification index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Using data from the UNOS database (156,749 deceased kidney transplants, 2007-2021), we randomly divided transplants into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. The primary measure was death-censored graft survival. Four machine learning models were assessed for calibration (integrated Brier score [IBS]) and discrimination (time-dependent concordance [CTD] index), compared with existing models. We conducted decision curve analysis and external validation using UK Transplant data. The Deep Cox mixture model showed the best discriminative performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.66, 0.67, and 0.68 at 6, 9, and 12 years post-transplant), with CTD at 0.66. Calibration was adequate (IBS = 0.12), while the kidney donor profile index (KDPI) model had lower CTD (0.59) and AUC (0.60). AI-based D-TOP outperformed the KDPI in evaluating transplant pairs based on graft survival, potentially enhancing deceased donor selection. Advanced computing is poised to influence kidney allocation schemes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信