Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Shan Jin , Paul Newell-Price , Sophie Tindale , Erik Hunter , Victoria Vicario-Modroño , Rosa Gallardo-Cobos , Pedro Sánchez-Zamora , Simona Miškolci , Lynn J. Frewer
{"title":"欧洲五国消费者在购买肉类和乳制品时,将动物福利置于环境可持续性之上","authors":"Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Shan Jin , Paul Newell-Price , Sophie Tindale , Erik Hunter , Victoria Vicario-Modroño , Rosa Gallardo-Cobos , Pedro Sánchez-Zamora , Simona Miškolci , Lynn J. Frewer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. <em>Freshness</em>, <em>quality/taste</em> and <em>animal welfare</em> emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as <em>food miles</em>, <em>carbon footprint</em>, and <em>organic production</em> were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards <em>sustainable food consumption</em>, <em>environmental attitudes</em>, and <em>food production and policies</em> emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding <em>animal welfare</em>, <em>food safety</em>, and <em>health and nutrition</em> was perceived as being more important than <em>environmental sustainability</em>. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818/pdfft?md5=6563bdfad7d26639e1ed49a9f622fce6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000818-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers across five European countries prioritise animal welfare above environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products\",\"authors\":\"Jeanine Ammann , Gabriele Mack , Nadja El Benni , Shan Jin , Paul Newell-Price , Sophie Tindale , Erik Hunter , Victoria Vicario-Modroño , Rosa Gallardo-Cobos , Pedro Sánchez-Zamora , Simona Miškolci , Lynn J. Frewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. <em>Freshness</em>, <em>quality/taste</em> and <em>animal welfare</em> emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as <em>food miles</em>, <em>carbon footprint</em>, and <em>organic production</em> were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards <em>sustainable food consumption</em>, <em>environmental attitudes</em>, and <em>food production and policies</em> emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding <em>animal welfare</em>, <em>food safety</em>, and <em>health and nutrition</em> was perceived as being more important than <em>environmental sustainability</em>. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818/pdfft?md5=6563bdfad7d26639e1ed49a9f622fce6&pid=1-s2.0-S0950329324000818-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324000818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consumers across five European countries prioritise animal welfare above environmental sustainability when buying meat and dairy products
Food production systems, especially meat and dairy supply chains, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. An important question emerges as to whether consumers care about environmental sustainability when buying food products, as this can determine their consumption practices. Further, if sustainability labels are available, identifying information that is relevant to consumers is important. This research therefore aimed to identify the attributes that are most important for consumers when buying meat or dairy products and the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels for meat and dairy products and important label properties. An online survey was conducted in five European countries (i.e. Czechia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK). Consumers valued similar attributes when buying meat and dairy products across all countries. Freshness, quality/taste and animal welfare emerged as the most important attributes, while environmental attributes such as food miles, carbon footprint, and organic production were the least important. Sustainability labels for meat and dairy products were perceived as helpful. Regression analysis identified similar patterns within all five countries regarding the predictors of the perceived helpfulness of sustainability labels. Attitudes towards sustainable food consumption, environmental attitudes, and food production and policies emerged as significant positive predictors in most models. Most importantly, information regarding animal welfare, food safety, and health and nutrition was perceived as being more important than environmental sustainability. This suggests that food choice decisions are unlikely to be made based on the environmental sustainability of a food product’s production alone.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.