比较两种用于检测 1 型糖尿病成人胰岛素抵抗的估计葡萄糖排出率方法。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1089/met.2023.0217
Muhammed Masum Canat, Yüksel Altuntaş
{"title":"比较两种用于检测 1 型糖尿病成人胰岛素抵抗的估计葡萄糖排出率方法。","authors":"Muhammed Masum Canat, Yüksel Altuntaş","doi":"10.1089/met.2023.0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The presence of insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a significant indicator of all chronic diabetic complications, independent of other risk factors. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a practical method that can be easily used in daily practice to determine IR. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for two eGDR methods and compare their diagnostic value for determining IR in adult T1DM patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study was performed on 184 adults admitted to the endocrinology outpatient clinic diagnosed with T1DM. Demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and the presence of hypertension (HT) were recorded. The eGDR of all patients was calculated using two formulas based on HbA1c level, presence of HT, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), or waist circumference (WC). Diagnostic cutoff values for both eGDRs were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff values. The accuracy of the diagnostic cutoffs for eGDRwhr and eGDRwc was compared using a Bland-Altman plot. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The cutoff value for eGDRwhr was 7.37 mg/(kg·min) with 83.3% specificity and 86.7% sensitivity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.901; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.824-0.977] and for eGDRwc 7.50 mg/(kg·min) with 79.8% specificity and 83.3% sensitivity (AUC = 0.895; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.817-0.972) for the presence of MetS. Further ROC analysis showed that the difference between the two AUCs (0.901 and 0.895) was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.923). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Assessment of eGDR would lead to early prevention of diabetic complications. eGDR is measured using either WHR or WC. This study is the first to compare WHR and WC in calculating eGDR in adults. WHR and WC are not superior to each other for calculating eGDR in determining IR in T1DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":18405,"journal":{"name":"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders","volume":" ","pages":"295-301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate Methods for Detecting Insulin Resistance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Masum Canat, Yüksel Altuntaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/met.2023.0217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The presence of insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a significant indicator of all chronic diabetic complications, independent of other risk factors. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a practical method that can be easily used in daily practice to determine IR. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for two eGDR methods and compare their diagnostic value for determining IR in adult T1DM patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study was performed on 184 adults admitted to the endocrinology outpatient clinic diagnosed with T1DM. Demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and the presence of hypertension (HT) were recorded. The eGDR of all patients was calculated using two formulas based on HbA1c level, presence of HT, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), or waist circumference (WC). Diagnostic cutoff values for both eGDRs were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff values. The accuracy of the diagnostic cutoffs for eGDRwhr and eGDRwc was compared using a Bland-Altman plot. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The cutoff value for eGDRwhr was 7.37 mg/(kg·min) with 83.3% specificity and 86.7% sensitivity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.901; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.824-0.977] and for eGDRwc 7.50 mg/(kg·min) with 79.8% specificity and 83.3% sensitivity (AUC = 0.895; <i>P</i> < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.817-0.972) for the presence of MetS. Further ROC analysis showed that the difference between the two AUCs (0.901 and 0.895) was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.923). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Assessment of eGDR would lead to early prevention of diabetic complications. eGDR is measured using either WHR or WC. This study is the first to compare WHR and WC in calculating eGDR in adults. WHR and WC are not superior to each other for calculating eGDR in determining IR in T1DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"295-301\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2023.0217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolic syndrome and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2023.0217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患者出现胰岛素抵抗(IR)是所有糖尿病慢性并发症的重要指标,与其他风险因素无关。估计葡萄糖排出率(eGDR)是一种实用的方法,可在日常实践中轻松用于确定胰岛素抵抗。本研究旨在确定两种 eGDR 方法的临界值,并比较它们对患有代谢综合征(MetS)的成年 T1DM 患者确定 IR 的诊断价值。方法:这项横断面研究的对象是内分泌科门诊确诊为 T1DM 的 184 名成人患者。研究记录了人口统计学特征、人体测量数据以及是否患有高血压(HT)。根据 HbA1c 水平、是否存在高血压、腰臀比(WHR)或腰围(WC),使用两种公式计算所有患者的 eGDR。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)分析确定了两种 eGDR 的诊断临界值。根据截断值将患者分为两组。使用布兰-阿尔特曼图比较了 eGDRwhr 和 eGDRwc 诊断截断值的准确性。结果eGDRwhr 的临界值为 7.37 mg/(kg-min),特异性为 83.3%,灵敏度为 86.7% [曲线下面积 (AUC) = 0.901; P P = 0.923]。结论eGDR 可通过 WHR 或 WC 测量。本研究首次比较了计算成人 eGDR 的 WHR 和 WC。在确定 T1DM 患者的 IR 时,WHR 和 WC 在计算 eGDR 方面并无优劣之分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Two Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate Methods for Detecting Insulin Resistance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: The presence of insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a significant indicator of all chronic diabetic complications, independent of other risk factors. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) is a practical method that can be easily used in daily practice to determine IR. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for two eGDR methods and compare their diagnostic value for determining IR in adult T1DM patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 184 adults admitted to the endocrinology outpatient clinic diagnosed with T1DM. Demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, and the presence of hypertension (HT) were recorded. The eGDR of all patients was calculated using two formulas based on HbA1c level, presence of HT, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), or waist circumference (WC). Diagnostic cutoff values for both eGDRs were defined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff values. The accuracy of the diagnostic cutoffs for eGDRwhr and eGDRwc was compared using a Bland-Altman plot. Results: The cutoff value for eGDRwhr was 7.37 mg/(kg·min) with 83.3% specificity and 86.7% sensitivity [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.901; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.824-0.977] and for eGDRwc 7.50 mg/(kg·min) with 79.8% specificity and 83.3% sensitivity (AUC = 0.895; P < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.817-0.972) for the presence of MetS. Further ROC analysis showed that the difference between the two AUCs (0.901 and 0.895) was not significant (P = 0.923). Conclusion: Assessment of eGDR would lead to early prevention of diabetic complications. eGDR is measured using either WHR or WC. This study is the first to compare WHR and WC in calculating eGDR in adults. WHR and WC are not superior to each other for calculating eGDR in determining IR in T1DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders
Metabolic syndrome and related disorders MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing solely on the pathophysiology, recognition, and treatment of this major health condition. The Journal meets the imperative for comprehensive research, data, and commentary on metabolic disorder as a suspected precursor to a wide range of diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, polycystic ovary syndrome, gout, and asthma. Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders coverage includes: -Insulin resistance- Central obesity- Glucose intolerance- Dyslipidemia with elevated triglycerides- Low HDL-cholesterol- Microalbuminuria- Predominance of small dense LDL-cholesterol particles- Hypertension- Endothelial dysfunction- Oxidative stress- Inflammation- Related disorders of polycystic ovarian syndrome, fatty liver disease (NASH), and gout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信