养殖海带的营养吸取能力比较以及代谢策略和营养来源的影响。

IF 2.8 3区 生物学 Q1 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
Tiffany Stephens, Schery Umanzor
{"title":"养殖海带的营养吸取能力比较以及代谢策略和营养来源的影响。","authors":"Tiffany Stephens,&nbsp;Schery Umanzor","doi":"10.1111/jpy.13442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seaweed aquaculture, particularly kelp farming, is a popular topic as a potential solution for mitigating anthropogenic pollutants and enhancing coastal drawdown of carbon and nitrogen. Using a common garden approach, this study evaluated nutrient drawdown capacities of <i>Alaria marginata</i> (ribbon kelp) and <i>Saccharina latissima</i> (sugar kelp) across four commercial kelp farms in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska. Our findings show that <i>A. marginata</i> exhibited ~30% more carbon and 21% more nitrogen content compared to <i>S. latissima</i>. These results demonstrate the potential for <i>A. marginata</i> to serve as a more efficient species for nutrient drawdown into farmed kelp tissues (per unit biomass) for consideration of potential mitigative actions. The efficacy of this drawdown is likely to be driven by the careful pairing of kelp species with farming environment. Temporally, there was a noted increase in carbon content and a decline in nitrogen content from March to May for both species, consistent with known seasonal nutrient dynamics in coastal waters. Notably, differences in the carbon stable isotope signatures (δ<sup>13</sup>C) between the kelps may hint at variations in metabolic pathways and nutrient sourcing, particularly concerning the preferential assimilation of CO<sub>2</sub> versus <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>HCO</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, and highlight the need for further work on this topic for applied macroalgal research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phycology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative nutrient drawdown capacities of farmed kelps and implications of metabolic strategy and nutrient source\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Stephens,&nbsp;Schery Umanzor\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jpy.13442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Seaweed aquaculture, particularly kelp farming, is a popular topic as a potential solution for mitigating anthropogenic pollutants and enhancing coastal drawdown of carbon and nitrogen. Using a common garden approach, this study evaluated nutrient drawdown capacities of <i>Alaria marginata</i> (ribbon kelp) and <i>Saccharina latissima</i> (sugar kelp) across four commercial kelp farms in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska. Our findings show that <i>A. marginata</i> exhibited ~30% more carbon and 21% more nitrogen content compared to <i>S. latissima</i>. These results demonstrate the potential for <i>A. marginata</i> to serve as a more efficient species for nutrient drawdown into farmed kelp tissues (per unit biomass) for consideration of potential mitigative actions. The efficacy of this drawdown is likely to be driven by the careful pairing of kelp species with farming environment. Temporally, there was a noted increase in carbon content and a decline in nitrogen content from March to May for both species, consistent with known seasonal nutrient dynamics in coastal waters. Notably, differences in the carbon stable isotope signatures (δ<sup>13</sup>C) between the kelps may hint at variations in metabolic pathways and nutrient sourcing, particularly concerning the preferential assimilation of CO<sub>2</sub> versus <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mi>HCO</mi>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math>, and highlight the need for further work on this topic for applied macroalgal research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Phycology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Phycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpy.13442\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phycology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpy.13442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海藻养殖,尤其是海带养殖,是一个热门话题,因为它是缓解人为污染物和提高沿海碳和氮汲取能力的潜在解决方案。本研究采用普通园林方法,评估了阿拉斯加东南部和中南部四个商业海藻养殖场的 Alaria marginata(带状海带)和 Saccharina latissima(糖海带)的营养吸收能力。我们的研究结果表明,与 S. latissima 相比,A. marginata 的碳含量高出约 30%,氮含量高出 21%。这些结果表明,A. marginata 有可能成为一种更有效的物种,将养分吸收到养殖的海藻组织中(单位生物量),以考虑潜在的缓解措施。海带物种与养殖环境的精心搭配可能会提高营养物质的吸收效率。从时间上看,从 3 月到 5 月,两种海藻的碳含量明显增加,氮含量下降,这与沿海水域已知的季节性营养动态一致。值得注意的是,海带之间碳稳定同位素特征(δ13C)的差异可能暗示了新陈代谢途径和营养来源的变化,特别是 CO2 相对于 HCO 3 - $$ {\mathrm{HCO}}_3^{-} 的优先同化。$$ ,并强调在大型藻类的应用研究中需要进一步开展这方面的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative nutrient drawdown capacities of farmed kelps and implications of metabolic strategy and nutrient source

Seaweed aquaculture, particularly kelp farming, is a popular topic as a potential solution for mitigating anthropogenic pollutants and enhancing coastal drawdown of carbon and nitrogen. Using a common garden approach, this study evaluated nutrient drawdown capacities of Alaria marginata (ribbon kelp) and Saccharina latissima (sugar kelp) across four commercial kelp farms in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska. Our findings show that A. marginata exhibited ~30% more carbon and 21% more nitrogen content compared to S. latissima. These results demonstrate the potential for A. marginata to serve as a more efficient species for nutrient drawdown into farmed kelp tissues (per unit biomass) for consideration of potential mitigative actions. The efficacy of this drawdown is likely to be driven by the careful pairing of kelp species with farming environment. Temporally, there was a noted increase in carbon content and a decline in nitrogen content from March to May for both species, consistent with known seasonal nutrient dynamics in coastal waters. Notably, differences in the carbon stable isotope signatures (δ13C) between the kelps may hint at variations in metabolic pathways and nutrient sourcing, particularly concerning the preferential assimilation of CO2 versus HCO 3 , and highlight the need for further work on this topic for applied macroalgal research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Phycology
Journal of Phycology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phycology was founded in 1965 by the Phycological Society of America. All aspects of basic and applied research on algae are included to provide a common medium for the ecologist, physiologist, cell biologist, molecular biologist, morphologist, oceanographer, taxonomist, geneticist, and biochemist. The Journal also welcomes research that emphasizes algal interactions with other organisms and the roles of algae as components of natural ecosystems. All aspects of basic and applied research on algae are included to provide a common medium for the ecologist, physiologist, cell biologist, molecular biologist, morphologist, oceanographer, acquaculturist, systematist, geneticist, and biochemist. The Journal also welcomes research that emphasizes algal interactions with other organisms and the roles of algae as components of natural ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信