肥胖症医学课程提高了内科住院医师在初级医疗环境中的肥胖症护理自我效能。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1111/cob.12656
Kacey Chae, Jashalynn German, Karla Kendrick, Sean Tackett, Paul O'Rourke, Kimberly A. Gudzune, Marci Laudenslager
{"title":"肥胖症医学课程提高了内科住院医师在初级医疗环境中的肥胖症护理自我效能。","authors":"Kacey Chae,&nbsp;Jashalynn German,&nbsp;Karla Kendrick,&nbsp;Sean Tackett,&nbsp;Paul O'Rourke,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Gudzune,&nbsp;Marci Laudenslager","doi":"10.1111/cob.12656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Primary care physicians (PCPs) report insufficient knowledge and training gaps in obesity care. Internal Medicine (IM) residency offers an opportunity to address this educational gap for future PCPs. We designed an innovative, multicomponent curriculum on obesity medicine (OM) in the primary care setting for IM residents. We then conducted a prospective, 6-month, two-arm study within two residency programs in Maryland evaluating feasibility (use, appropriateness for IM training, and satisfaction) of the curriculum as well as changes in self-efficacy within seven obesity care domains, assessed on 4-point scales (1—not at all confident to 4—very confident). One residency program received the curriculum and the other served as the control group. We recruited 35 IM residents to participate (17 intervention, 18 control). Among intervention residents, 42% used all curricular components; appropriateness and satisfaction with the curriculum were high. Compared with controls, intervention residents had statistically significant increases in five obesity care self-efficacy domains: nutrition (intervention 0.8 vs. control 0.2, <i>p</i> = .02), behaviour change (1.2 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), weight-gain-promoting medications (0.8 vs. 0.1, <i>p</i> = .01), anti-obesity medications (1.2 vs. 0.5, <i>p</i> = .03), and bariatric surgical counselling (0.9 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i> = .03). There were no significant changes in physical activity or post-bariatric surgical care domains. Our OM curriculum is feasible with IM residents and increases residents' obesity care self-efficacy beyond what is achieved with usual IM training.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An obesity medicine curriculum increases the obesity care self-efficacy of internal medicine residents in the primary care setting\",\"authors\":\"Kacey Chae,&nbsp;Jashalynn German,&nbsp;Karla Kendrick,&nbsp;Sean Tackett,&nbsp;Paul O'Rourke,&nbsp;Kimberly A. Gudzune,&nbsp;Marci Laudenslager\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Primary care physicians (PCPs) report insufficient knowledge and training gaps in obesity care. Internal Medicine (IM) residency offers an opportunity to address this educational gap for future PCPs. We designed an innovative, multicomponent curriculum on obesity medicine (OM) in the primary care setting for IM residents. We then conducted a prospective, 6-month, two-arm study within two residency programs in Maryland evaluating feasibility (use, appropriateness for IM training, and satisfaction) of the curriculum as well as changes in self-efficacy within seven obesity care domains, assessed on 4-point scales (1—not at all confident to 4—very confident). One residency program received the curriculum and the other served as the control group. We recruited 35 IM residents to participate (17 intervention, 18 control). Among intervention residents, 42% used all curricular components; appropriateness and satisfaction with the curriculum were high. Compared with controls, intervention residents had statistically significant increases in five obesity care self-efficacy domains: nutrition (intervention 0.8 vs. control 0.2, <i>p</i> = .02), behaviour change (1.2 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i> &lt; .01), weight-gain-promoting medications (0.8 vs. 0.1, <i>p</i> = .01), anti-obesity medications (1.2 vs. 0.5, <i>p</i> = .03), and bariatric surgical counselling (0.9 vs. 0.4, <i>p</i> = .03). There were no significant changes in physical activity or post-bariatric surgical care domains. Our OM curriculum is feasible with IM residents and increases residents' obesity care self-efficacy beyond what is achieved with usual IM training.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级保健医生(PCPs)报告称,他们在肥胖症护理方面的知识和培训不足。内科住院医师培训为解决未来初级保健医生的这一教育缺口提供了机会。我们为内科住院医师设计了一个创新的、多元素的课程,内容涉及初级保健环境中的肥胖医学 (OM)。然后,我们在马里兰州的两个住院医师培训项目中开展了一项为期 6 个月的前瞻性双臂研究,评估该课程的可行性(使用情况、对 IM 培训的适宜性和满意度)以及在七个肥胖症护理领域中自我效能的变化,评估采用 4 点量表(1-完全没有信心到 4-非常有信心)。一个住院医师培训项目接受了该课程,另一个作为对照组。我们招募了 35 名综合管理住院医师参加(17 名干预组,18 名对照组)。在干预组住院医师中,42%的人使用了所有课程内容;他们对课程的适宜性和满意度都很高。与对照组相比,干预组住院医师在以下五个肥胖症护理自我效能方面有统计学意义的显著提高:营养(干预组 0.8 vs. 对照组 0.2,p = .02)、行为改变(干预组 1.2 vs. 对照组 0.4,p = .02)、肥胖症护理自我效能(干预组 1.2 vs. 对照组 0.4,p = .02)、肥胖症护理自我效能(干预组 1.2 vs. 对照组 0.4,p = .02)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An obesity medicine curriculum increases the obesity care self-efficacy of internal medicine residents in the primary care setting

Primary care physicians (PCPs) report insufficient knowledge and training gaps in obesity care. Internal Medicine (IM) residency offers an opportunity to address this educational gap for future PCPs. We designed an innovative, multicomponent curriculum on obesity medicine (OM) in the primary care setting for IM residents. We then conducted a prospective, 6-month, two-arm study within two residency programs in Maryland evaluating feasibility (use, appropriateness for IM training, and satisfaction) of the curriculum as well as changes in self-efficacy within seven obesity care domains, assessed on 4-point scales (1—not at all confident to 4—very confident). One residency program received the curriculum and the other served as the control group. We recruited 35 IM residents to participate (17 intervention, 18 control). Among intervention residents, 42% used all curricular components; appropriateness and satisfaction with the curriculum were high. Compared with controls, intervention residents had statistically significant increases in five obesity care self-efficacy domains: nutrition (intervention 0.8 vs. control 0.2, p = .02), behaviour change (1.2 vs. 0.4, p < .01), weight-gain-promoting medications (0.8 vs. 0.1, p = .01), anti-obesity medications (1.2 vs. 0.5, p = .03), and bariatric surgical counselling (0.9 vs. 0.4, p = .03). There were no significant changes in physical activity or post-bariatric surgical care domains. Our OM curriculum is feasible with IM residents and increases residents' obesity care self-efficacy beyond what is achieved with usual IM training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信