二氧化锆浆料、表面处理和储存对氧化锆的威布尔特性和树脂粘接强度的影响。

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405581
Anne Heloyse Teixeira Crispim, Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva, Fernanda Gurgel de Gois Moreira, Bianca Cristina Dantas da Silva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Liliana Gressler May, Natália de Freitas Daudt, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza
{"title":"二氧化锆浆料、表面处理和储存对氧化锆的威布尔特性和树脂粘接强度的影响。","authors":"Anne Heloyse Teixeira Crispim, Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva, Fernanda Gurgel de Gois Moreira, Bianca Cristina Dantas da Silva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Liliana Gressler May, Natália de Freitas Daudt, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective is to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and storage on the shear strength of ultratranslucent zirconia. 36 blocks of ultra-translucent zirconia were fabricated (7x7x2mm) and sintered. Then, divided into 12 groups according to the \"surface treatment\" (C -Primer; Al -Sandblasting with Al2O3 + Primer; Si -Silicate + Primer; Gl -Glaze + HF + Primer; Z -Zirlink; Zp -Zirlink + Primer) and \"storage\" factors (ST-with 150 days/37º and without). After surface treatment, five cylinders (Ø=2mm; h=2.0mm) of resin cement (n=15) were constructed in each ceramic block; at the end, the shear strength test was performed (1mm/min, 50Kgf), and analysis of surface failures. 60 additional samples (2x2x2mm) were made for extras analysis (surface roughness, MEV, and EDS). Bond strength and surface roughness data were statistically evaluated by ANOVA (2 factors/1 factor), Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis, respectively. ANOVA (2-way) revealed that all factors were statistically significant for bond strength. The silicatization groups (SiST: 30.47AMPa; Si: 29.21AMPa) showed the highest bond strength values, regardless of storage (Tukey's test). While the groups treated with Zirlink (ZST: 2.76FMPa; Z: 5.27EFMPa) showed the lowest values, just similar to the GlST group (5.14EFMPa). The Weibull modulus (m) showed a statistical difference between groups (p=0.000). ANOVA (1 factor) revealed that the \"surface treatment\" factor (p=0.0000) was statistically significant for surface roughness. Therefore, the application of Zirlink and Glaze on pre-sintered zirconia did not promote efficient adhesion of the ultratranslucent zirconia to the resin cement, even when associated with a primer containing MDP.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ZrO2 paste, surface treatments, and storage on Weibull characteristics and resin bond strength to zirconia.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Heloyse Teixeira Crispim, Sarah Emille Gomes da Silva, Fernanda Gurgel de Gois Moreira, Bianca Cristina Dantas da Silva, Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva, Liliana Gressler May, Natália de Freitas Daudt, Rodrigo Othávio Assunção Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-6440202405581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective is to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and storage on the shear strength of ultratranslucent zirconia. 36 blocks of ultra-translucent zirconia were fabricated (7x7x2mm) and sintered. Then, divided into 12 groups according to the \\\"surface treatment\\\" (C -Primer; Al -Sandblasting with Al2O3 + Primer; Si -Silicate + Primer; Gl -Glaze + HF + Primer; Z -Zirlink; Zp -Zirlink + Primer) and \\\"storage\\\" factors (ST-with 150 days/37º and without). After surface treatment, five cylinders (Ø=2mm; h=2.0mm) of resin cement (n=15) were constructed in each ceramic block; at the end, the shear strength test was performed (1mm/min, 50Kgf), and analysis of surface failures. 60 additional samples (2x2x2mm) were made for extras analysis (surface roughness, MEV, and EDS). Bond strength and surface roughness data were statistically evaluated by ANOVA (2 factors/1 factor), Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis, respectively. ANOVA (2-way) revealed that all factors were statistically significant for bond strength. The silicatization groups (SiST: 30.47AMPa; Si: 29.21AMPa) showed the highest bond strength values, regardless of storage (Tukey's test). While the groups treated with Zirlink (ZST: 2.76FMPa; Z: 5.27EFMPa) showed the lowest values, just similar to the GlST group (5.14EFMPa). The Weibull modulus (m) showed a statistical difference between groups (p=0.000). ANOVA (1 factor) revealed that the \\\"surface treatment\\\" factor (p=0.0000) was statistically significant for surface roughness. Therefore, the application of Zirlink and Glaze on pre-sintered zirconia did not promote efficient adhesion of the ultratranslucent zirconia to the resin cement, even when associated with a primer containing MDP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"35 \",\"pages\":\"e245581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976298/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是评估不同表面处理和储存对超半透明氧化锆剪切强度的影响。制作并烧结了 36 块超半透明氧化锆(7x7x2 毫米)。然后,根据 "表面处理"(C-底漆;Al-喷砂与 Al2O3 + 底漆;Si-硅酸盐 + 底漆;Gl-釉 + HF + 底漆;Z-Zirlink;Zp-Zirlink + 底漆)和 "储存 "因素(ST-150 天/37º 和不储存)分为 12 组。表面处理后,在每个陶瓷块中制作 5 个树脂水泥圆柱体(Ø=2 毫米;h=2.0 毫米)(n=15);最后进行剪切强度测试(1 毫米/分钟,50 千克力),并分析表面故障。另外还制作了 60 个样品(2x2x2mm)用于额外分析(表面粗糙度、MEV 和 EDS)。粘接强度和表面粗糙度数据分别通过方差分析(2 因子/1 因子)、Tukey 检验(5%)和 Weibull 分析进行了统计评估。方差分析(2-way)表明,所有因素对粘接强度都有显著的统计学意义。硅化组(SiST:30.47AMPa;Si:29.21AMPa)显示出最高的粘接强度值,与储存无关(Tukey 检验)。而用 Zirlink 处理的组别(ZST:2.76FMPa;Z:5.27EFMPa)显示的值最低,与 GlST 组(5.14EFMPa)相似。各组之间的威布尔模量(m)存在统计学差异(p=0.000)。方差分析(1 个因子)显示,"表面处理 "因子(p=0.0000)对表面粗糙度的影响具有统计学意义。因此,在预烧结氧化锆上使用 Zirlink 和 Glaze 并不能促进超透亮氧化锆与树脂水泥的有效粘附,即使与含有 MDP 的底漆一起使用也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of ZrO2 paste, surface treatments, and storage on Weibull characteristics and resin bond strength to zirconia.

The objective is to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and storage on the shear strength of ultratranslucent zirconia. 36 blocks of ultra-translucent zirconia were fabricated (7x7x2mm) and sintered. Then, divided into 12 groups according to the "surface treatment" (C -Primer; Al -Sandblasting with Al2O3 + Primer; Si -Silicate + Primer; Gl -Glaze + HF + Primer; Z -Zirlink; Zp -Zirlink + Primer) and "storage" factors (ST-with 150 days/37º and without). After surface treatment, five cylinders (Ø=2mm; h=2.0mm) of resin cement (n=15) were constructed in each ceramic block; at the end, the shear strength test was performed (1mm/min, 50Kgf), and analysis of surface failures. 60 additional samples (2x2x2mm) were made for extras analysis (surface roughness, MEV, and EDS). Bond strength and surface roughness data were statistically evaluated by ANOVA (2 factors/1 factor), Tukey test (5%), and Weibull analysis, respectively. ANOVA (2-way) revealed that all factors were statistically significant for bond strength. The silicatization groups (SiST: 30.47AMPa; Si: 29.21AMPa) showed the highest bond strength values, regardless of storage (Tukey's test). While the groups treated with Zirlink (ZST: 2.76FMPa; Z: 5.27EFMPa) showed the lowest values, just similar to the GlST group (5.14EFMPa). The Weibull modulus (m) showed a statistical difference between groups (p=0.000). ANOVA (1 factor) revealed that the "surface treatment" factor (p=0.0000) was statistically significant for surface roughness. Therefore, the application of Zirlink and Glaze on pre-sintered zirconia did not promote efficient adhesion of the ultratranslucent zirconia to the resin cement, even when associated with a primer containing MDP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信