围手术期护士手术良知行动障碍测量工具的开发与验证。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Danielle Quintana, Rebecca Keele, Nina Fredland, Jennifer Woo
{"title":"围手术期护士手术良知行动障碍测量工具的开发与验证。","authors":"Danielle Quintana, Rebecca Keele, Nina Fredland, Jennifer Woo","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgical conscience is a concept well known to perioperative nurses, yet it is rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically validate an original instrument called the Surgical Conscience Scale with perioperative nurses. <b>Methods:</b> The Surgical Conscience Scale was designed after a review of the literature, the creation of a concept analysis, content validity, and pilot testing. Validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with separate groups of participants. <b>Results:</b> EFA results explained 55% of the variance with three factors: Foundational Components, Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action, and Required Attributes. The CFA findings did not support goodness-of-fit indices in total; however, a valid and reliable subscale was discovered that measures barriers to using one's surgical conscience. This six-item scale, now referred to as the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale, had all six items of this factor (.734, .754, .806, .689, and .573) with strong loadings (>.5). Additionally, a good reliability coefficient of the subscale (α = .874) supports the recommendation to use this subscale on its own to measure barriers of surgical conscience. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale can promote awareness about the harmful consequences of failed action on behalf of perioperative nurses and help promote proficient surgical conscience usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action in Perioperative Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Quintana, Rebecca Keele, Nina Fredland, Jennifer Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JNM-2023-0019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgical conscience is a concept well known to perioperative nurses, yet it is rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically validate an original instrument called the Surgical Conscience Scale with perioperative nurses. <b>Methods:</b> The Surgical Conscience Scale was designed after a review of the literature, the creation of a concept analysis, content validity, and pilot testing. Validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with separate groups of participants. <b>Results:</b> EFA results explained 55% of the variance with three factors: Foundational Components, Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action, and Required Attributes. The CFA findings did not support goodness-of-fit indices in total; however, a valid and reliable subscale was discovered that measures barriers to using one's surgical conscience. This six-item scale, now referred to as the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale, had all six items of this factor (.734, .754, .806, .689, and .573) with strong loadings (>.5). Additionally, a good reliability coefficient of the subscale (α = .874) supports the recommendation to use this subscale on its own to measure barriers of surgical conscience. <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale can promote awareness about the harmful consequences of failed action on behalf of perioperative nurses and help promote proficient surgical conscience usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2023-0019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术良知是围手术期护士众所周知的一个概念,但很少有人对其进行研究。本研究的目的是开发一种名为 "手术良知量表 "的原创工具,并在围手术期护士中进行心理计量学验证。方法:手术良知量表是在查阅文献、概念分析、内容效度和试点测试后设计的。通过探索性因子分析 (EFA) 和确认性因子分析 (CFA),对不同组别的参与者进行了有效性探讨。结果如下EFA 结果用三个因子解释了 55% 的方差:基础要素、外科良心行动的障碍和所需属性。CFA结果并不支持总体拟合优度指数;但是,发现了一个有效可靠的子量表,用于测量运用外科良知的障碍。该量表由六个项目组成,现称为 "手术良知行动障碍量表"(Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale),该因子的所有六个项目(.734、.754、.806、.689 和.573)都具有很强的负荷(>.5)。此外,该分量表的信度系数(α = .874)也很高,因此建议单独使用该分量表来测量手术良知障碍。结论手术良知行动障碍量表的使用可提高围手术期护士对行动失败的有害后果的认识,有助于促进手术良知的熟练使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action in Perioperative Nurses.

Background: Surgical conscience is a concept well known to perioperative nurses, yet it is rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically validate an original instrument called the Surgical Conscience Scale with perioperative nurses. Methods: The Surgical Conscience Scale was designed after a review of the literature, the creation of a concept analysis, content validity, and pilot testing. Validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with separate groups of participants. Results: EFA results explained 55% of the variance with three factors: Foundational Components, Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action, and Required Attributes. The CFA findings did not support goodness-of-fit indices in total; however, a valid and reliable subscale was discovered that measures barriers to using one's surgical conscience. This six-item scale, now referred to as the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale, had all six items of this factor (.734, .754, .806, .689, and .573) with strong loadings (>.5). Additionally, a good reliability coefficient of the subscale (α = .874) supports the recommendation to use this subscale on its own to measure barriers of surgical conscience. Conclusion: The use of the Barriers to Surgical Conscience Action Scale can promote awareness about the harmful consequences of failed action on behalf of perioperative nurses and help promote proficient surgical conscience usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信