多孔过滤净化结合高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定畜禽肉中的农药、兽药、霉菌毒素和持久性有机污染物

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Xuwei Guo, Youzhi Su, Jun Liu, Yanmei Li, Fang Li, Hongqin Lei
{"title":"多孔过滤净化结合高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定畜禽肉中的农药、兽药、霉菌毒素和持久性有机污染物","authors":"Xuwei Guo,&nbsp;Youzhi Su,&nbsp;Jun Liu,&nbsp;Yanmei Li,&nbsp;Fang Li,&nbsp;Hongqin Lei","doi":"10.1007/s12161-024-02615-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A method for the determination of 106 pesticides, 74 veterinary drugs, 10 mycotoxins, and 18 persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat was developed and validated in the present study. The meat was extracted with acetonitrile under citric acid caching and purified using the multi-plug filtration clean-up (m-PFC) column. The components were separated using liquid chromatography on a C<sub>18</sub> column and then eluted using a gradient of the aqueous solutions of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (containing 2 mmol/L ammonium acetate) as the mobile phase. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed next using two electrospraying scan modes—the positive ion mode and the negative ion mode, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The results revealed that all 208 target analytes exhibited good linearity in their respective linear ranges, with the correlation coefficient of each analyte above 0.9953 and the corresponding limits of quantification (LOQs) in the range of 0.1–9.8 µg/kg. The average recovery values of 189 targets at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high ranged from 70.1 to 120.0%, and the corresponding values of relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 1.3 to 15.0%, respectively. The remaining 19 targets exhibited the average recovery values [at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high] ranging from 18.6 to 58.9%, with the corresponding RSD values ranging from 1.5 to 11.3%. The developed method was applied to 132 batches of livestock and poultry meat, and nine pesticides and seven veterinary drugs were detected in the concentration range of 0.1–24.8 µg/kg. These results suggested that the developed method is simple, reliable, reproducible, and suitable for the determination of pesticides, veterinary drugs, mycotoxins, and persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"17 7","pages":"957 - 996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-plug Filtration Purification Combined with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides, Veterinary Drugs, Mycotoxins, and Persistent Organic Pollutants in Livestock and Poultry Meat\",\"authors\":\"Xuwei Guo,&nbsp;Youzhi Su,&nbsp;Jun Liu,&nbsp;Yanmei Li,&nbsp;Fang Li,&nbsp;Hongqin Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-024-02615-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A method for the determination of 106 pesticides, 74 veterinary drugs, 10 mycotoxins, and 18 persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat was developed and validated in the present study. The meat was extracted with acetonitrile under citric acid caching and purified using the multi-plug filtration clean-up (m-PFC) column. The components were separated using liquid chromatography on a C<sub>18</sub> column and then eluted using a gradient of the aqueous solutions of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (containing 2 mmol/L ammonium acetate) as the mobile phase. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed next using two electrospraying scan modes—the positive ion mode and the negative ion mode, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The results revealed that all 208 target analytes exhibited good linearity in their respective linear ranges, with the correlation coefficient of each analyte above 0.9953 and the corresponding limits of quantification (LOQs) in the range of 0.1–9.8 µg/kg. The average recovery values of 189 targets at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high ranged from 70.1 to 120.0%, and the corresponding values of relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 1.3 to 15.0%, respectively. The remaining 19 targets exhibited the average recovery values [at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high] ranging from 18.6 to 58.9%, with the corresponding RSD values ranging from 1.5 to 11.3%. The developed method was applied to 132 batches of livestock and poultry meat, and nine pesticides and seven veterinary drugs were detected in the concentration range of 0.1–24.8 µg/kg. These results suggested that the developed method is simple, reliable, reproducible, and suitable for the determination of pesticides, veterinary drugs, mycotoxins, and persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"957 - 996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02615-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-024-02615-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究建立并验证了测定畜禽肉中106种农药、74种兽药、10种霉菌毒素和18种持久性有机污染物的方法。畜禽肉在柠檬酸缓蚀条件下用乙腈提取,然后用多管柱过滤净化(m-PFC)柱净化。采用 C18 色谱柱进行液相色谱分离,然后以乙腈和 0.1% 甲酸水溶液(含 2 mmol/L 乙酸铵)的梯度洗脱作为流动相。接下来使用两种电喷雾扫描模式--正离子模式和负离子模式以及多反应监测(MRM)模式进行了质谱分析。结果表明,所有 208 种目标分析物在各自的线性范围内均表现出良好的线性关系,每种分析物的相关系数均高于 0.9953,相应的定量限(LOQ)范围为 0.1-9.8 µg/kg。189 个目标物在低、中、高三种不同加标水平下的平均回收率为 70.1% 至 120.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)分别为 1.3% 至 15.0%。其余 19 个目标物在低、中、高三种不同加标水平下的平均回收率为 18.6% 至 58.9%,相应的 RSD 值为 1.5% 至 11.3%。对 132 批畜禽肉进行了检测,在 0.1-24.8 µg/kg 的浓度范围内检出了 9 种农药和 7 种兽药。结果表明该方法简便、可靠、重现性好,适用于畜禽肉中农药、兽药、霉菌毒素和持久性有机污染物的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-plug Filtration Purification Combined with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides, Veterinary Drugs, Mycotoxins, and Persistent Organic Pollutants in Livestock and Poultry Meat

Multi-plug Filtration Purification Combined with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Determination of Pesticides, Veterinary Drugs, Mycotoxins, and Persistent Organic Pollutants in Livestock and Poultry Meat

A method for the determination of 106 pesticides, 74 veterinary drugs, 10 mycotoxins, and 18 persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat was developed and validated in the present study. The meat was extracted with acetonitrile under citric acid caching and purified using the multi-plug filtration clean-up (m-PFC) column. The components were separated using liquid chromatography on a C18 column and then eluted using a gradient of the aqueous solutions of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (containing 2 mmol/L ammonium acetate) as the mobile phase. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed next using two electrospraying scan modes—the positive ion mode and the negative ion mode, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes. The results revealed that all 208 target analytes exhibited good linearity in their respective linear ranges, with the correlation coefficient of each analyte above 0.9953 and the corresponding limits of quantification (LOQs) in the range of 0.1–9.8 µg/kg. The average recovery values of 189 targets at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high ranged from 70.1 to 120.0%, and the corresponding values of relative standard deviation (RSD) ranged from 1.3 to 15.0%, respectively. The remaining 19 targets exhibited the average recovery values [at three different spiked levels of low, medium, and high] ranging from 18.6 to 58.9%, with the corresponding RSD values ranging from 1.5 to 11.3%. The developed method was applied to 132 batches of livestock and poultry meat, and nine pesticides and seven veterinary drugs were detected in the concentration range of 0.1–24.8 µg/kg. These results suggested that the developed method is simple, reliable, reproducible, and suitable for the determination of pesticides, veterinary drugs, mycotoxins, and persistent organic pollutants in livestock and poultry meat.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信