西利奈克索对复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Laila Shafei , Shaima Bashir , Esther W. Chan , Dina Abushanab , Anas Hamad , Daoud Al-Badriyeh
{"title":"西利奈克索对复发和难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效和安全性:荟萃分析","authors":"Laila Shafei ,&nbsp;Shaima Bashir ,&nbsp;Esther W. Chan ,&nbsp;Dina Abushanab ,&nbsp;Anas Hamad ,&nbsp;Daoud Al-Badriyeh","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P&lt;0.05, using the RevMan software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55193,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cancer","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Laila Shafei ,&nbsp;Shaima Bashir ,&nbsp;Esther W. Chan ,&nbsp;Dina Abushanab ,&nbsp;Anas Hamad ,&nbsp;Daoud Al-Badriyeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P&lt;0.05, using the RevMan software.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101076\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027224000175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027224000175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的Selinexor是一种首创的口服选择性核出口抑制剂,美国食品药品管理局(2019年)加速批准其用于复发性和难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。方法我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL、clinicaltrial.gov和google scholar截至2023年5月有关selinexor用于RRMM的研究。除安全性结果外,我们关注的结果指标主要是疗效结果。结果对纳入的11项临床试验进行了Meta分析,结果显示西利奈索的总体临床获益率为56.21%,总体应答率为46.91%,完全应答率为4.89%,非常好的部分应答率为23.41%,部分应答率为24.68%,疾病稳定率为28.06%。由于安全性原因,西利奈克索的停药率显著增加,达到 16.80%。亚组分析表明,与单独使用西利奈德相比,西利奈德联合地塞米松和蛋白酶体抑制剂的疗效更高。多发性骨髓瘤类型、高细胞遗传风险、难治性状态和晚期疾病状态对疗效没有影响。结论 尽管与安全性相关的停药率较高,但Selinexor在RRMM患者中产生了显著的阳性反应,且安全性可接受。基于Selinexor的联合用药进一步增强了疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of selinexor for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis

Purpose

Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective-inhibitor-of-nuclear-export, granted accelerated approval by FDA (2019) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We sought to quantitatively summarize the selinexor efficacy and safety in RRMM.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, clinicaltrial.gov, and google scholar, until May 2023, studies about selinexor use in RRMM. The outcome measures of interest were primarily efficacy outcomes, in addition to safety outcomes. Random-effect model analyses were performed, at statistical significance of P<0.05, using the RevMan software.

Results

Meta-analyses of eleven included clinical trials yielded a significant 56.21% overall clinical benefit, 46.91% overall response, 4.89% complete response, 23.41% very good partial response, 24.68% partial response, and 28.06% stable disease rates with selinexor. Due to safety reasons, selinexor caused significant increase in discontinuation rate, 16.80%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated higher efficacy with selinexor plus dexamethasone and proteasome inhibitor combinations than with selinexor alone. The multiple myeloma type, high cytogenetic risk, refractory state, and advanced disease state did not affect performance. Risk of selection, performance, and detection biases were unclear in the included trials.

Conclusion

Selinexor led to significant positive responses with an acceptable safety profile in RRMM patients, despite higher rates of safety-related discontinuations. Selinexor-based combinations further enhanced response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cancer
Current Problems in Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Cancer seeks to promote and disseminate innovative, transformative, and impactful data on patient-oriented cancer research and clinical care. Specifically, the journal''s scope is focused on reporting the results of well-designed cancer studies that influence/alter practice or identify new directions in clinical cancer research. These studies can include novel therapeutic approaches, new strategies for early diagnosis, cancer clinical trials, and supportive care, among others. Papers that focus solely on laboratory-based or basic science research are discouraged. The journal''s format also allows, on occasion, for a multi-faceted overview of a single topic via a curated selection of review articles, while also offering articles that present dynamic material that influences the oncology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信