前十字韧带重建术后未能恢复运动的主观原因:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Katie Yensen, Cory K Mayfield, Ioanna K Bolia, Ryan A Palmer, Michael Brown, Daniel R Kim, Maya S Abu-Zahra, Jacob L Kotlier, Thomas Webb, Emmett Cleary, Nima Saboori, Frank A Petrigliano, Alexander E Weber
{"title":"前十字韧带重建术后未能恢复运动的主观原因:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Katie Yensen, Cory K Mayfield, Ioanna K Bolia, Ryan A Palmer, Michael Brown, Daniel R Kim, Maya S Abu-Zahra, Jacob L Kotlier, Thomas Webb, Emmett Cleary, Nima Saboori, Frank A Petrigliano, Alexander E Weber","doi":"10.1177/19417381241231631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While current literature has explored the outcomes of athletes who return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, less is known about the outcomes of those who are unsuccessful in returning to sport.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the rate of athletes who did not RTS after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify the specific subjective reasons for failure to RTS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted through April 2021.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies included those explicitly reporting the rate of failure for RTS after ACLR as well as providing details on reasons for athletes' inability to return; 31 studies met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2 to 4.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The reasons for failure to RTS referred to in our study are derived from those established previously in the studies included. Data were collected on the number of athletes, mean age, mean follow-up time, type of sport played, failure to RTS rate, and specific reasons for failure to return.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted rate of failure to RTS after ACLR was 25.5% (95% CI, 19.88-31.66). The estimated proportion of psychosocial-related reasons cited for failure to RTS was significantly greater than knee-related reasons for failure RTS (55.4% vs 44.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The most cited reason for failure to RTS was fear of reinjury (33.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study estimates the rate of failure to RTS after ACLR to be 25.5%, with the majority of athletes citing fear of reinjury as the major deterrent for returning to sports. We highlight how factors independent of surgical outcomes may impact an athlete's ability to return to play given that the predominant reason for no RTS after ACLR was unrelated to the knee.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":" ","pages":"243-251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective Causes for Failure to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Katie Yensen, Cory K Mayfield, Ioanna K Bolia, Ryan A Palmer, Michael Brown, Daniel R Kim, Maya S Abu-Zahra, Jacob L Kotlier, Thomas Webb, Emmett Cleary, Nima Saboori, Frank A Petrigliano, Alexander E Weber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19417381241231631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While current literature has explored the outcomes of athletes who return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, less is known about the outcomes of those who are unsuccessful in returning to sport.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the rate of athletes who did not RTS after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify the specific subjective reasons for failure to RTS.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted through April 2021.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Eligible studies included those explicitly reporting the rate of failure for RTS after ACLR as well as providing details on reasons for athletes' inability to return; 31 studies met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2 to 4.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The reasons for failure to RTS referred to in our study are derived from those established previously in the studies included. Data were collected on the number of athletes, mean age, mean follow-up time, type of sport played, failure to RTS rate, and specific reasons for failure to return.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The weighted rate of failure to RTS after ACLR was 25.5% (95% CI, 19.88-31.66). The estimated proportion of psychosocial-related reasons cited for failure to RTS was significantly greater than knee-related reasons for failure RTS (55.4% vs 44.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). The most cited reason for failure to RTS was fear of reinjury (33.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study estimates the rate of failure to RTS after ACLR to be 25.5%, with the majority of athletes citing fear of reinjury as the major deterrent for returning to sports. We highlight how factors independent of surgical outcomes may impact an athlete's ability to return to play given that the predominant reason for no RTS after ACLR was unrelated to the knee.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"243-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241231631\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241231631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管目前的文献对前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后重返运动场(RTS)的运动员的结果进行了探讨,但对那些未能成功重返运动场的运动员的结果却知之甚少:目的:确定前交叉韧带初次重建(ACLR)后未能重返运动场的运动员比例,并找出未能重返运动场的具体主观原因:数据来源:截至 2021 年 4 月,对 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了全面检索:符合条件的研究包括明确报告 ACLR 术后 RTS 失败率的研究,以及提供运动员无法重返赛场的详细原因的研究;31 项研究符合纳入标准:研究设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析:数据提取:我们的研究中提到的无法重返赛场的原因来自于之前纳入的研究中确定的原因。收集的数据包括运动员人数、平均年龄、平均随访时间、运动类型、康复训练失败率以及康复训练失败的具体原因:结果:前交叉韧带置换术后未能重返赛场的加权率为 25.5%(95% CI,19.88-31.66)。据估计,因社会心理相关原因而未能复运的比例明显高于因膝关节相关原因而未能复运的比例(55.4% vs 44.6%,P < 0.01)。最常引用的RTS失败原因是害怕再次受伤(33.0%):本研究估计,前交叉韧带置换术后的转运失败率为25.5%,大多数运动员认为害怕再次受伤是阻碍他们重返运动场的主要原因。鉴于前交叉韧带置换术后未重返赛场的主要原因与膝关节无关,我们强调了与手术结果无关的因素如何影响运动员重返赛场的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective Causes for Failure to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Context: While current literature has explored the outcomes of athletes who return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, less is known about the outcomes of those who are unsuccessful in returning to sport.

Objective: To determine the rate of athletes who did not RTS after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and to identify the specific subjective reasons for failure to RTS.

Data sources: A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted through April 2021.

Study selection: Eligible studies included those explicitly reporting the rate of failure for RTS after ACLR as well as providing details on reasons for athletes' inability to return; 31 studies met the inclusion criteria.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Level of evidence: Level 2 to 4.

Data extraction: The reasons for failure to RTS referred to in our study are derived from those established previously in the studies included. Data were collected on the number of athletes, mean age, mean follow-up time, type of sport played, failure to RTS rate, and specific reasons for failure to return.

Results: The weighted rate of failure to RTS after ACLR was 25.5% (95% CI, 19.88-31.66). The estimated proportion of psychosocial-related reasons cited for failure to RTS was significantly greater than knee-related reasons for failure RTS (55.4% vs 44.6%, P < 0.01). The most cited reason for failure to RTS was fear of reinjury (33.0%).

Conclusion: This study estimates the rate of failure to RTS after ACLR to be 25.5%, with the majority of athletes citing fear of reinjury as the major deterrent for returning to sports. We highlight how factors independent of surgical outcomes may impact an athlete's ability to return to play given that the predominant reason for no RTS after ACLR was unrelated to the knee.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信