胆囊切除术后患者进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影的时机及其对ERCP术后并发症的影响

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Fevzi Cebi, Burak Altunpak, Arif Kaya, Hande Kandemir, Mehmet Karabulut
{"title":"胆囊切除术后患者进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影的时机及其对ERCP术后并发症的影响","authors":"Fevzi Cebi, Burak Altunpak, Arif Kaya, Hande Kandemir, Mehmet Karabulut","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to the increasing use of laparoscopy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and other gallbladder disorders, as well as the ongoing issue of associated biliary tree injuries, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) still holds a significant position in the diagnosis and treatment of postcholecystectomy disorders. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP with the post-ERCP complications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ninety-six patients with a history of cholecystectomy who underwent ERCP between January 2016 and January 2021 at the General Surgery Clinic of the University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate analyses. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the matter of post-ERCP complication status, differences observed in terms of age, body mass index (BMI) values, gender, comorbidities, number of ERCP procedures, and the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP among cases were not statistically significant. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Our study demonstrates that age, BMI values, gender, comorbidities, ERCP count, and the time between procedures are not significant risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Regardless of the time between surgery and ERCP, the presence of post-ERCP complications is comparable.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Postcholecystectomy Patients and Its Effect on Post-ERCP Complications.\",\"authors\":\"Fevzi Cebi, Burak Altunpak, Arif Kaya, Hande Kandemir, Mehmet Karabulut\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lap.2024.0037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to the increasing use of laparoscopy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and other gallbladder disorders, as well as the ongoing issue of associated biliary tree injuries, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) still holds a significant position in the diagnosis and treatment of postcholecystectomy disorders. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP with the post-ERCP complications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Ninety-six patients with a history of cholecystectomy who underwent ERCP between January 2016 and January 2021 at the General Surgery Clinic of the University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate analyses. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the matter of post-ERCP complication status, differences observed in terms of age, body mass index (BMI) values, gender, comorbidities, number of ERCP procedures, and the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP among cases were not statistically significant. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Our study demonstrates that age, BMI values, gender, comorbidities, ERCP count, and the time between procedures are not significant risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Regardless of the time between surgery and ERCP, the presence of post-ERCP complications is comparable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于越来越多地使用腹腔镜治疗无症状胆石症和其他胆囊疾病,以及相关胆管损伤问题的持续存在,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)在胆囊切除术后疾病的诊断和治疗中仍占有重要地位。我们的研究旨在探讨胆囊切除术和 ERCP 之间的时间间隔与 ERCP 术后并发症之间的关系。研究方法对2016年1月至2021年1月期间在巴克尔科伊健康科学大学萨迪-科努克博士健康应用与研究中心普通外科门诊接受ERCP的96名有胆囊切除术史的患者进行了回顾性评估。通过单变量分析对患者和手术相关因素进行了统计分析。结果在ERCP术后并发症方面,观察到各病例在年龄、体重指数(BMI)值、性别、合并症、ERCP手术次数以及胆囊切除术与ERCP之间的间隔时间等方面的差异无统计学意义。讨论:我们的研究表明,年龄、体重指数值、性别、合并症、ERCP次数和手术间隔时间不是ERCP术后并发症的重要风险因素。无论手术与ERCP间隔时间长短,ERCP术后并发症的发生率都是相当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Postcholecystectomy Patients and Its Effect on Post-ERCP Complications.

Background: Due to the increasing use of laparoscopy for symptomatic cholelithiasis and other gallbladder disorders, as well as the ongoing issue of associated biliary tree injuries, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) still holds a significant position in the diagnosis and treatment of postcholecystectomy disorders. In our study, we aimed to examine the relationship between the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP with the post-ERCP complications. Methods: Ninety-six patients with a history of cholecystectomy who underwent ERCP between January 2016 and January 2021 at the General Surgery Clinic of the University of Health Sciences Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Health Application and Research Center were retrospectively evaluated. Patient and procedure-related factors were analyzed statistically through univariate analyses. Results: In the matter of post-ERCP complication status, differences observed in terms of age, body mass index (BMI) values, gender, comorbidities, number of ERCP procedures, and the time elapsed between cholecystectomy and ERCP among cases were not statistically significant. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that age, BMI values, gender, comorbidities, ERCP count, and the time between procedures are not significant risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Regardless of the time between surgery and ERCP, the presence of post-ERCP complications is comparable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信