针对患有疲劳综合征或风湿病的青少年的持续性疲劳采取定制与通用自我管理策略后的个体效果:多项单一案例研究。

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Anouk Vroegindeweij, Jan Houtveen, Desiree A. Lucassen, Elise M. Van De Putte, Nico M. Wulffraat, Sanne L. Nijhof, Joost F. Swart
{"title":"针对患有疲劳综合征或风湿病的青少年的持续性疲劳采取定制与通用自我管理策略后的个体效果:多项单一案例研究。","authors":"Anouk Vroegindeweij,&nbsp;Jan Houtveen,&nbsp;Desiree A. Lucassen,&nbsp;Elise M. Van De Putte,&nbsp;Nico M. Wulffraat,&nbsp;Sanne L. Nijhof,&nbsp;Joost F. Swart","doi":"10.1111/bjhp.12722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine individual outcomes after tailored lifestyle (PROfeel) or generic dietary advice as self-management intervention for persistent fatigue in adolescents and young adults with a chronic condition, to compare participants who did and did not benefit and to explore changes to factors in the biopsychosocial model of fatigue after PROfeel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A multiple single-case AB-phase design was embedded in a randomized crossover trial (<i>N</i> = 45). Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) on outcomes ‘fatigue severity’, ‘self-efficacy’ and ‘quality of life’ (QoL) were collected through weekly smartphone measurement for 20 weeks. ILD on biopsychosocial factors were collected through experience sampling methodology for 28 days pre-post first intervention. Baseline characteristics were compared with <i>t</i>-tests and chi-square tests. Permutation distancing tests were used to assess change over time in all ILD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Regarding weekly measurements, nineteen participants (42.22%) showed small to large positive outcomes (<i>d</i><sub>range</sub> = .05 to 2.59), mostly after PROfeel. Eleven participants (24.44%) showed small to moderate negative outcomes (<i>d</i><sub>range</sub> = −.02 to −2.46), mostly after dietary advice. Fatigue severity improved most, followed by self-efficacy. Participants who benefitted showed higher QoL levels and lower fatigue and pain levels compared with others at baseline (all <i>p</i> &lt; .02). When positive outcomes were observed after PROfeel, typically ≥1 biopsychosocial factor had been targeted successfully.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Self-management advice has more potential when tailored to individual characteristics, including the biopsychosocial model of fatigue. PROfeel appears particularly useful as fatigue intervention for individuals with relatively less severe symptoms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48161,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Psychology","volume":"29 3","pages":"712-730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12722","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual outcomes after tailored versus generic self-management strategies for persistent fatigue in youth with a fatigue syndrome or rheumatic condition: A multiple single-case study\",\"authors\":\"Anouk Vroegindeweij,&nbsp;Jan Houtveen,&nbsp;Desiree A. Lucassen,&nbsp;Elise M. Van De Putte,&nbsp;Nico M. Wulffraat,&nbsp;Sanne L. Nijhof,&nbsp;Joost F. Swart\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjhp.12722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine individual outcomes after tailored lifestyle (PROfeel) or generic dietary advice as self-management intervention for persistent fatigue in adolescents and young adults with a chronic condition, to compare participants who did and did not benefit and to explore changes to factors in the biopsychosocial model of fatigue after PROfeel.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multiple single-case AB-phase design was embedded in a randomized crossover trial (<i>N</i> = 45). Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) on outcomes ‘fatigue severity’, ‘self-efficacy’ and ‘quality of life’ (QoL) were collected through weekly smartphone measurement for 20 weeks. ILD on biopsychosocial factors were collected through experience sampling methodology for 28 days pre-post first intervention. Baseline characteristics were compared with <i>t</i>-tests and chi-square tests. Permutation distancing tests were used to assess change over time in all ILD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Regarding weekly measurements, nineteen participants (42.22%) showed small to large positive outcomes (<i>d</i><sub>range</sub> = .05 to 2.59), mostly after PROfeel. Eleven participants (24.44%) showed small to moderate negative outcomes (<i>d</i><sub>range</sub> = −.02 to −2.46), mostly after dietary advice. Fatigue severity improved most, followed by self-efficacy. Participants who benefitted showed higher QoL levels and lower fatigue and pain levels compared with others at baseline (all <i>p</i> &lt; .02). When positive outcomes were observed after PROfeel, typically ≥1 biopsychosocial factor had been targeted successfully.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Self-management advice has more potential when tailored to individual characteristics, including the biopsychosocial model of fatigue. PROfeel appears particularly useful as fatigue intervention for individuals with relatively less severe symptoms.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"712-730\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjhp.12722\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12722\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjhp.12722","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究对患有慢性疾病的青少年和年轻成年人进行量身定制的生活方式(PROfeel)或普通饮食建议作为持续疲劳自我管理干预后的个体结果,比较受益和未受益的参与者,并探讨PROfeel后疲劳的生物心理社会模型中各因素的变化:方法:在随机交叉试验(N = 45)中采用了多重单病例 AB 阶段设计。通过每周一次的智能手机测量,收集有关 "疲劳严重程度"、"自我效能 "和 "生活质量"(QoL)结果的密集纵向数据(ILD),为期20周。关于生物心理社会因素的 ILD 是通过经验抽样方法收集的,为期 28 天,在首次干预前-后进行。基线特征通过 t 检验和卡方检验进行比较。结果:关于每周的测量结果,19 名参与者(42.22%)显示出了由小到大的积极结果(drange = .05 至 2.59),其中大部分是在 PROfeel 之后。11名参与者(24.44%)显示出小到中等程度的负面结果(drange = -.02 至 -2.46),大部分是在饮食建议之后。疲劳严重程度改善最大,其次是自我效能。与基线时的其他参与者相比,受益参与者的 QoL 水平更高,疲劳和疼痛水平更低(均为 p):自我管理建议如能根据个人特点(包括疲劳的生物心理社会模型)量身定制,则更有潜力。对于症状相对较轻的人来说,PROfeel 似乎是一种特别有用的疲劳干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Individual outcomes after tailored versus generic self-management strategies for persistent fatigue in youth with a fatigue syndrome or rheumatic condition: A multiple single-case study

Individual outcomes after tailored versus generic self-management strategies for persistent fatigue in youth with a fatigue syndrome or rheumatic condition: A multiple single-case study

Objective

To examine individual outcomes after tailored lifestyle (PROfeel) or generic dietary advice as self-management intervention for persistent fatigue in adolescents and young adults with a chronic condition, to compare participants who did and did not benefit and to explore changes to factors in the biopsychosocial model of fatigue after PROfeel.

Method

A multiple single-case AB-phase design was embedded in a randomized crossover trial (N = 45). Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) on outcomes ‘fatigue severity’, ‘self-efficacy’ and ‘quality of life’ (QoL) were collected through weekly smartphone measurement for 20 weeks. ILD on biopsychosocial factors were collected through experience sampling methodology for 28 days pre-post first intervention. Baseline characteristics were compared with t-tests and chi-square tests. Permutation distancing tests were used to assess change over time in all ILD.

Results

Regarding weekly measurements, nineteen participants (42.22%) showed small to large positive outcomes (drange = .05 to 2.59), mostly after PROfeel. Eleven participants (24.44%) showed small to moderate negative outcomes (drange = −.02 to −2.46), mostly after dietary advice. Fatigue severity improved most, followed by self-efficacy. Participants who benefitted showed higher QoL levels and lower fatigue and pain levels compared with others at baseline (all p < .02). When positive outcomes were observed after PROfeel, typically ≥1 biopsychosocial factor had been targeted successfully.

Conclusion

Self-management advice has more potential when tailored to individual characteristics, including the biopsychosocial model of fatigue. PROfeel appears particularly useful as fatigue intervention for individuals with relatively less severe symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Health Psychology
British Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
1.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The focus of the British Journal of Health Psychology is to publish original research on various aspects of psychology that are related to health, health-related behavior, and illness throughout a person's life. The journal specifically seeks articles that are based on health psychology theory or discuss theoretical matters within the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信