{"title":"卵巢反应性高的人孕酮过早升高的风险最高。","authors":"Alfredo Cortés-Vazquez, Greys Thelma Vásquez-Ramírez, Alfredo Leonardo Cortés-Algara, Jesús-Daniel Moreno-García, Panagiotis Drakopoulos","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20240004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Late follicular phase progesterone elevation is a complication that affects approximately 38% of IVF cycles. There is a lack of consensus on the appropriate cut-off levels for progesterone on hCG day. Although premature progesterone rise occurs in all kinds of ovarian responses, there is a knowledge gap regarding the ovarian response with the highest risk of this phenomenon. Our study aims to assess the relative risk of each kind of ovarian response for premature progesterone rise and evaluate the prevalence of premature progesterone rise in each ovarian response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional, comparative and analytic study was performed at the Reproductive Endocrinology Department in Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre in Mexico City. All conventional-antagonist cycles were grouped according to their ovarian response and were evaluated from 2015 to 2020. Pearson's Squared-chi, Cramer's V, cross-table and the relative risk were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of premature progesterone rise oscillated from 20.8 to 67.9% for low and high ovarian responders, respectively. After calculating the relative risk, high ovarian responders had a 1.38 higher risk for premature progesterone rise than other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High ovarian responders have the highest risk for premature progesterone rise compared to normal and low ovarian responders. High ovarian responders have a 67.9% prevalence of premature progesterone rise.</p>","PeriodicalId":46364,"journal":{"name":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","volume":" ","pages":"295-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High ovarian responders have the highest risk of premature progesterone rise.\",\"authors\":\"Alfredo Cortés-Vazquez, Greys Thelma Vásquez-Ramírez, Alfredo Leonardo Cortés-Algara, Jesús-Daniel Moreno-García, Panagiotis Drakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/1518-0557.20240004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Late follicular phase progesterone elevation is a complication that affects approximately 38% of IVF cycles. There is a lack of consensus on the appropriate cut-off levels for progesterone on hCG day. Although premature progesterone rise occurs in all kinds of ovarian responses, there is a knowledge gap regarding the ovarian response with the highest risk of this phenomenon. Our study aims to assess the relative risk of each kind of ovarian response for premature progesterone rise and evaluate the prevalence of premature progesterone rise in each ovarian response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional, comparative and analytic study was performed at the Reproductive Endocrinology Department in Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre in Mexico City. All conventional-antagonist cycles were grouped according to their ovarian response and were evaluated from 2015 to 2020. Pearson's Squared-chi, Cramer's V, cross-table and the relative risk were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of premature progesterone rise oscillated from 20.8 to 67.9% for low and high ovarian responders, respectively. After calculating the relative risk, high ovarian responders had a 1.38 higher risk for premature progesterone rise than other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High ovarian responders have the highest risk for premature progesterone rise compared to normal and low ovarian responders. High ovarian responders have a 67.9% prevalence of premature progesterone rise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"295-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152415/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的卵泡晚期孕酮升高是一种并发症,影响到约 38% 的试管婴儿周期。关于 hCG 日孕酮的适当临界水平,目前还缺乏共识。虽然孕酮过早升高会发生在各种卵巢反应中,但关于发生这种现象风险最高的卵巢反应,目前还存在知识空白。我们的研究旨在评估每种卵巢反应发生孕酮过早升高的相对风险,并评估每种卵巢反应中孕酮过早升高的发生率:方法:我们在墨西哥城国立 20 de Noviembre 中心生殖内分泌科进行了一项回顾性、横断面、比较和分析研究。根据卵巢反应对所有常规拮抗剂周期进行了分组,并从 2015 年至 2020 年对其进行了评估。计算了皮尔逊方差、Cramer's V、交叉表和相对风险:低卵巢反应者和高卵巢反应者孕酮过早升高的发生率分别为 20.8%至 67.9%。计算相对风险后,高卵巢反应者孕酮过早升高的风险比其他组别高 1.38:结论:与正常和低卵巢反应者相比,高卵巢反应者孕酮过早升高的风险最高。高卵巢反应者孕酮过早升高的发生率为 67.9%。
High ovarian responders have the highest risk of premature progesterone rise.
Objective: Late follicular phase progesterone elevation is a complication that affects approximately 38% of IVF cycles. There is a lack of consensus on the appropriate cut-off levels for progesterone on hCG day. Although premature progesterone rise occurs in all kinds of ovarian responses, there is a knowledge gap regarding the ovarian response with the highest risk of this phenomenon. Our study aims to assess the relative risk of each kind of ovarian response for premature progesterone rise and evaluate the prevalence of premature progesterone rise in each ovarian response.
Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional, comparative and analytic study was performed at the Reproductive Endocrinology Department in Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre in Mexico City. All conventional-antagonist cycles were grouped according to their ovarian response and were evaluated from 2015 to 2020. Pearson's Squared-chi, Cramer's V, cross-table and the relative risk were calculated.
Results: The prevalence of premature progesterone rise oscillated from 20.8 to 67.9% for low and high ovarian responders, respectively. After calculating the relative risk, high ovarian responders had a 1.38 higher risk for premature progesterone rise than other groups.
Conclusions: High ovarian responders have the highest risk for premature progesterone rise compared to normal and low ovarian responders. High ovarian responders have a 67.9% prevalence of premature progesterone rise.