评估用于监测社区老年人和痴呆症患者睡眠和昼夜节律的数字技术的协议》(A Protocol for Evaluating Digital Technology for Monitoring Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older People and People Living with Dementia in the Community)。

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ciro Della Monica, Kiran K G Ravindran, Giuseppe Atzori, Damion J Lambert, Thalia Rodriguez, Sara Mahvash-Mohammadi, Ullrich Bartsch, Anne C Skeldon, Kevin Wells, Adam Hampshire, Ramin Nilforooshan, Hana Hassanin, The Uk Dementia Research Institute Care Research Amp Technology Research Group, Victoria L Revell, Derk-Jan Dijk
{"title":"评估用于监测社区老年人和痴呆症患者睡眠和昼夜节律的数字技术的协议》(A Protocol for Evaluating Digital Technology for Monitoring Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older People and People Living with Dementia in the Community)。","authors":"Ciro Della Monica, Kiran K G Ravindran, Giuseppe Atzori, Damion J Lambert, Thalia Rodriguez, Sara Mahvash-Mohammadi, Ullrich Bartsch, Anne C Skeldon, Kevin Wells, Adam Hampshire, Ramin Nilforooshan, Hana Hassanin, The Uk Dementia Research Institute Care Research Amp Technology Research Group, Victoria L Revell, Derk-Jan Dijk","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep6010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance are predictors of poor physical and mental health, including dementia. Long-term digital technology-enabled monitoring of sleep and circadian rhythms in the community has great potential for early diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression, and assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Before novel digital technology-based monitoring can be implemented at scale, its performance and acceptability need to be evaluated and compared to gold-standard methodology in relevant populations. Here, we describe our protocol for the evaluation of novel sleep and circadian technology which we have applied in cognitively intact older adults and are currently using in people living with dementia (PLWD). In this protocol, we test a range of technologies simultaneously at home (7-14 days) and subsequently in a clinical research facility in which gold standard methodology for assessing sleep and circadian physiology is implemented. We emphasize the importance of assessing both nocturnal and diurnal sleep (naps), valid markers of circadian physiology, and that evaluation of technology is best achieved in protocols in which sleep is mildly disturbed and in populations that are relevant to the intended use-case. We provide details on the design, implementation, challenges, and advantages of this protocol, along with examples of datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Protocol for Evaluating Digital Technology for Monitoring Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older People and People Living with Dementia in the Community.\",\"authors\":\"Ciro Della Monica, Kiran K G Ravindran, Giuseppe Atzori, Damion J Lambert, Thalia Rodriguez, Sara Mahvash-Mohammadi, Ullrich Bartsch, Anne C Skeldon, Kevin Wells, Adam Hampshire, Ramin Nilforooshan, Hana Hassanin, The Uk Dementia Research Institute Care Research Amp Technology Research Group, Victoria L Revell, Derk-Jan Dijk\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clockssleep6010010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance are predictors of poor physical and mental health, including dementia. Long-term digital technology-enabled monitoring of sleep and circadian rhythms in the community has great potential for early diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression, and assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Before novel digital technology-based monitoring can be implemented at scale, its performance and acceptability need to be evaluated and compared to gold-standard methodology in relevant populations. Here, we describe our protocol for the evaluation of novel sleep and circadian technology which we have applied in cognitively intact older adults and are currently using in people living with dementia (PLWD). In this protocol, we test a range of technologies simultaneously at home (7-14 days) and subsequently in a clinical research facility in which gold standard methodology for assessing sleep and circadian physiology is implemented. We emphasize the importance of assessing both nocturnal and diurnal sleep (naps), valid markers of circadian physiology, and that evaluation of technology is best achieved in protocols in which sleep is mildly disturbed and in populations that are relevant to the intended use-case. We provide details on the design, implementation, challenges, and advantages of this protocol, along with examples of datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clocks & Sleep\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10968838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clocks & Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep6010010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep6010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

睡眠和昼夜节律紊乱是身心健康状况不佳(包括痴呆症)的预兆。利用数字技术对社区中的睡眠和昼夜节律进行长期监测,在早期诊断、监测疾病进展和评估干预措施的有效性方面具有巨大潜力。在大规模实施基于数字技术的新型监测之前,需要对其性能和可接受性进行评估,并在相关人群中将其与黄金标准方法进行比较。在此,我们将介绍新型睡眠和昼夜节律技术的评估方案,该方案已应用于认知功能完好的老年人,目前正用于痴呆症患者(PLWD)。在这一方案中,我们在家中同时测试一系列技术(7-14 天),随后在临床研究机构进行测试,该机构采用金标准方法评估睡眠和昼夜生理学。我们强调评估夜间和昼间睡眠(小睡)的重要性,以及昼夜节律生理学的有效标记,并强调在睡眠受到轻度干扰的方案中以及在与预期用途相关的人群中进行技术评估效果最佳。我们将详细介绍该方案的设计、实施、挑战和优势,并提供数据集示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Protocol for Evaluating Digital Technology for Monitoring Sleep and Circadian Rhythms in Older People and People Living with Dementia in the Community.

Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance are predictors of poor physical and mental health, including dementia. Long-term digital technology-enabled monitoring of sleep and circadian rhythms in the community has great potential for early diagnosis, monitoring of disease progression, and assessing the effectiveness of interventions. Before novel digital technology-based monitoring can be implemented at scale, its performance and acceptability need to be evaluated and compared to gold-standard methodology in relevant populations. Here, we describe our protocol for the evaluation of novel sleep and circadian technology which we have applied in cognitively intact older adults and are currently using in people living with dementia (PLWD). In this protocol, we test a range of technologies simultaneously at home (7-14 days) and subsequently in a clinical research facility in which gold standard methodology for assessing sleep and circadian physiology is implemented. We emphasize the importance of assessing both nocturnal and diurnal sleep (naps), valid markers of circadian physiology, and that evaluation of technology is best achieved in protocols in which sleep is mildly disturbed and in populations that are relevant to the intended use-case. We provide details on the design, implementation, challenges, and advantages of this protocol, along with examples of datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信