Christof A Bertram, Taryn A Donovan, Alexander Bartel
{"title":"有丝分裂活动:关于猫科动物肿瘤评估方法和预后价值的系统性文献综述。","authors":"Christof A Bertram, Taryn A Donovan, Alexander Bartel","doi":"10.1177/03009858241239566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Increased proliferation is a driver of tumorigenesis, and quantification of mitotic activity is a standard task for prognostication. This systematic review is an analysis of all available references on mitotic activity in feline tumors to provide an overview of the assessment methods and prognostic value. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus and a nonsystematic search in Google Scholar were conducted. All articles on feline tumors that correlated mitotic activity with patient outcome were identified. Data analysis revealed that of the 42 eligible articles, mitotic count (MC, mitotic figures/tumor area) was evaluated in 39 studies, and mitotic index (MI, mitotic figures/tumor cells) in 3 studies. The risk of bias was considered high for most studies (26/42, 62%) based on small study populations, insufficient details of the MC/MI methods, and lack of statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy or effect on outcome. The MC/MI methods varied between studies. A significant association of MC with survival was determined in 20 of 28 (71%) studies (10 studies evaluated other outcome metrics or provided individual patient data), while 1 study found an inverse effect. Three tumor types had at least 4 studies, and a prognostic association with survival was found in 5 of 6 studies on mast cell tumors, 5 of 5 on mammary tumors, and 3 of 4 on soft-tissue sarcomas. MI was shown to correlate with survival for mammary tumors by 2 research groups; however, comparisons to MC were not conducted. Further studies with standardized mitotic activity methods and appropriate statistical analysis for discriminant ability of patient outcome are needed to infer the prognostic value of MC and MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23513,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"743-751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitotic activity: A systematic literature review of the assessment methodology and prognostic value in feline tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Christof A Bertram, Taryn A Donovan, Alexander Bartel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03009858241239566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Increased proliferation is a driver of tumorigenesis, and quantification of mitotic activity is a standard task for prognostication. This systematic review is an analysis of all available references on mitotic activity in feline tumors to provide an overview of the assessment methods and prognostic value. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus and a nonsystematic search in Google Scholar were conducted. All articles on feline tumors that correlated mitotic activity with patient outcome were identified. Data analysis revealed that of the 42 eligible articles, mitotic count (MC, mitotic figures/tumor area) was evaluated in 39 studies, and mitotic index (MI, mitotic figures/tumor cells) in 3 studies. The risk of bias was considered high for most studies (26/42, 62%) based on small study populations, insufficient details of the MC/MI methods, and lack of statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy or effect on outcome. The MC/MI methods varied between studies. A significant association of MC with survival was determined in 20 of 28 (71%) studies (10 studies evaluated other outcome metrics or provided individual patient data), while 1 study found an inverse effect. Three tumor types had at least 4 studies, and a prognostic association with survival was found in 5 of 6 studies on mast cell tumors, 5 of 5 on mammary tumors, and 3 of 4 on soft-tissue sarcomas. MI was shown to correlate with survival for mammary tumors by 2 research groups; however, comparisons to MC were not conducted. Further studies with standardized mitotic activity methods and appropriate statistical analysis for discriminant ability of patient outcome are needed to infer the prognostic value of MC and MI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"743-751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858241239566\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03009858241239566","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
增殖是肿瘤发生的驱动因素,有丝分裂活性的量化是预后的一项标准任务。本系统综述分析了所有关于猫科动物肿瘤有丝分裂活动的现有参考文献,以提供评估方法和预后价值的概述。我们在 PubMed 和 Scopus 上进行了系统性文献检索,并在 Google Scholar 上进行了非系统性检索。所有关于猫科动物肿瘤的文章都与有丝分裂活动和患者预后相关。数据分析显示,在 42 篇符合条件的文章中,39 项研究评估了有丝分裂计数(MC,有丝分裂图形/肿瘤面积),3 项研究评估了有丝分裂指数(MI,有丝分裂图形/肿瘤细胞)。大多数研究(26/42,62%)的偏倚风险被认为很高,原因是研究人群较小、MC/MI 方法的细节不充分、缺乏诊断准确性或对结果影响的统计测量。不同研究的 MC/MI 方法各不相同。28项研究中有20项(71%)确定了MC与生存率有明显关系(10项研究评估了其他结果指标或提供了单个患者数据),而1项研究发现了反向影响。三种肿瘤类型至少有 4 项研究,6 项关于肥大细胞瘤的研究中有 5 项发现了预后与生存的相关性,5 项关于乳腺肿瘤的研究中有 5 项发现了预后与生存的相关性,4 项关于软组织肉瘤的研究中有 3 项发现了预后与生存的相关性。有 2 个研究小组的研究表明,MI 与乳腺肿瘤的存活率有关;但没有与 MC 进行比较。要推断 MC 和 MI 的预后价值,还需要采用标准化的有丝分裂活动方法和适当的统计分析对患者预后进行判别。
Mitotic activity: A systematic literature review of the assessment methodology and prognostic value in feline tumors.
Increased proliferation is a driver of tumorigenesis, and quantification of mitotic activity is a standard task for prognostication. This systematic review is an analysis of all available references on mitotic activity in feline tumors to provide an overview of the assessment methods and prognostic value. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus and a nonsystematic search in Google Scholar were conducted. All articles on feline tumors that correlated mitotic activity with patient outcome were identified. Data analysis revealed that of the 42 eligible articles, mitotic count (MC, mitotic figures/tumor area) was evaluated in 39 studies, and mitotic index (MI, mitotic figures/tumor cells) in 3 studies. The risk of bias was considered high for most studies (26/42, 62%) based on small study populations, insufficient details of the MC/MI methods, and lack of statistical measures for diagnostic accuracy or effect on outcome. The MC/MI methods varied between studies. A significant association of MC with survival was determined in 20 of 28 (71%) studies (10 studies evaluated other outcome metrics or provided individual patient data), while 1 study found an inverse effect. Three tumor types had at least 4 studies, and a prognostic association with survival was found in 5 of 6 studies on mast cell tumors, 5 of 5 on mammary tumors, and 3 of 4 on soft-tissue sarcomas. MI was shown to correlate with survival for mammary tumors by 2 research groups; however, comparisons to MC were not conducted. Further studies with standardized mitotic activity methods and appropriate statistical analysis for discriminant ability of patient outcome are needed to infer the prognostic value of MC and MI.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Pathology (VET) is the premier international publication of basic and applied research involving domestic, laboratory, wildlife, marine and zoo animals, and poultry. Bridging the divide between natural and experimental diseases, the journal details the diagnostic investigations of diseases of animals; reports experimental studies on mechanisms of specific processes; provides unique insights into animal models of human disease; and presents studies on environmental and pharmaceutical hazards.