自闭症和发育障碍监测网络中的自闭症社区测试实践。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1111/ppe.13077
Ashley Robinson Williams, Esther Amoakohene, Matthew J Maenner, Walter Zahorodny, Monica DiRienzo, Andrea Grzybowski, Jennifer Hall-Lande, Elise T Pas, Amanda V Bakian, Maya Lopez, Mary Patrick, Josephine Shenouda, Kelly A Shaw
{"title":"自闭症和发育障碍监测网络中的自闭症社区测试实践。","authors":"Ashley Robinson Williams, Esther Amoakohene, Matthew J Maenner, Walter Zahorodny, Monica DiRienzo, Andrea Grzybowski, Jennifer Hall-Lande, Elise T Pas, Amanda V Bakian, Maya Lopez, Mary Patrick, Josephine Shenouda, Kelly A Shaw","doi":"10.1111/ppe.13077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No data exist at the population level on what tests are used to aid in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in community practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe autism spectrum disorder testing practices to inform autism spectrum disorder identification efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, a multi-site surveillance system reporting prevalence estimates and characteristics of 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. Percentages of children with autism spectrum disorder who received any autism spectrum disorder test or a 'gold standard' test were calculated by site, sex, race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Risk ratios were calculated to compare group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5058 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder across 11 sites, 3236 (64.0%) had a record of any autism spectrum disorder test and 2136 (42.2%) had a 'gold standard' ADOS or ADI-R test. Overall, 115 children (2.3%) had both the ADOS and ADI-R in their records. Differences persisted across race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Asian/Pacific Islander children had the highest percent receiving any ASD test (71.8%; other groups range: 57.4-66.0%) and White children had the highest percent receiving 'gold standard' tests (46.4%; other groups range: 35.6-43.2%). Children in low-income neighbourhoods had a lower percent of any test (62.5%) and 'gold standard' tests (39.4%) compared to medium (70.2% and 47.5%, respectively) and high (69.6% and 46.8%, respectively) income neighbourhoods. Children with intellectual disability had a lower percent of any ASD test (81.7%) and 'gold standard' tests (52.6%) compared to children without intellectual disability (84.0% and 57.6%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder testing practices vary widely by site and differ by race and presence of co-occurring intellectual disability, suggesting opportunities to standardise and/or improve autism spectrum disorder identification practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community testing practices for autism within the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Robinson Williams, Esther Amoakohene, Matthew J Maenner, Walter Zahorodny, Monica DiRienzo, Andrea Grzybowski, Jennifer Hall-Lande, Elise T Pas, Amanda V Bakian, Maya Lopez, Mary Patrick, Josephine Shenouda, Kelly A Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.13077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No data exist at the population level on what tests are used to aid in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in community practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe autism spectrum disorder testing practices to inform autism spectrum disorder identification efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, a multi-site surveillance system reporting prevalence estimates and characteristics of 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. Percentages of children with autism spectrum disorder who received any autism spectrum disorder test or a 'gold standard' test were calculated by site, sex, race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Risk ratios were calculated to compare group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5058 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder across 11 sites, 3236 (64.0%) had a record of any autism spectrum disorder test and 2136 (42.2%) had a 'gold standard' ADOS or ADI-R test. Overall, 115 children (2.3%) had both the ADOS and ADI-R in their records. Differences persisted across race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Asian/Pacific Islander children had the highest percent receiving any ASD test (71.8%; other groups range: 57.4-66.0%) and White children had the highest percent receiving 'gold standard' tests (46.4%; other groups range: 35.6-43.2%). Children in low-income neighbourhoods had a lower percent of any test (62.5%) and 'gold standard' tests (39.4%) compared to medium (70.2% and 47.5%, respectively) and high (69.6% and 46.8%, respectively) income neighbourhoods. Children with intellectual disability had a lower percent of any ASD test (81.7%) and 'gold standard' tests (52.6%) compared to children without intellectual disability (84.0% and 57.6%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Autism spectrum disorder testing practices vary widely by site and differ by race and presence of co-occurring intellectual disability, suggesting opportunities to standardise and/or improve autism spectrum disorder identification practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262993/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13077\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.13077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在社区实践中,自闭症谱系障碍的辅助诊断测试有哪些?关于在社区实践中使用哪些测试来帮助诊断自闭症谱系障碍,目前尚无人群层面的数据:描述自闭症谱系障碍测试方法,为自闭症谱系障碍识别工作提供信息:数据来自自闭症和发育障碍监测网络,该网络是一个多站点监测系统,报告8岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童的患病率估计值和特征。按地点、性别、种族、家庭收入中位数和智力状况计算了接受任何自闭症谱系障碍测试或 "黄金标准 "测试的自闭症谱系障碍儿童的百分比。计算风险比以比较组间差异:在 11 个研究机构的 5058 名 8 岁自闭症谱系障碍儿童中,3236 人(64.0%)接受过任何自闭症谱系障碍测试,2136 人(42.2%)接受过 "黄金标准 "ADOS 或 ADI-R 测试。总体而言,115 名儿童(2.3%)的记录中同时包含 ADOS 和 ADI-R。不同种族、家庭收入中位数和智力状况的儿童之间仍然存在差异。亚裔/太平洋岛民儿童接受任何 ASD 测试的比例最高(71.8%;其他组别比例范围:57.4-66.0%),白人儿童接受 "黄金标准 "测试的比例最高(46.4%;其他组别比例范围:35.6-43.2%)。与中等收入社区(分别为 70.2% 和 47.5%)和高收入社区(分别为 69.6% 和 46.8%)相比,低收入社区儿童接受任何检查(62.5%)和 "金标准 "检查(39.4%)的比例较低。与非智障儿童(分别为 84.0% 和 57.6%)相比,智障儿童接受任何自闭症谱系障碍测试(81.7%)和 "黄金标准 "测试(52.6%)的比例较低:自闭症谱系障碍测试方法在不同地区有很大差异,并且因种族和是否合并智障而不同,这表明有机会对自闭症谱系障碍识别方法进行标准化和/或改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Community testing practices for autism within the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network.

Background: No data exist at the population level on what tests are used to aid in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in community practice.

Objectives: To describe autism spectrum disorder testing practices to inform autism spectrum disorder identification efforts.

Methods: Data are from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, a multi-site surveillance system reporting prevalence estimates and characteristics of 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. Percentages of children with autism spectrum disorder who received any autism spectrum disorder test or a 'gold standard' test were calculated by site, sex, race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Risk ratios were calculated to compare group differences.

Results: Of 5058 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder across 11 sites, 3236 (64.0%) had a record of any autism spectrum disorder test and 2136 (42.2%) had a 'gold standard' ADOS or ADI-R test. Overall, 115 children (2.3%) had both the ADOS and ADI-R in their records. Differences persisted across race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Asian/Pacific Islander children had the highest percent receiving any ASD test (71.8%; other groups range: 57.4-66.0%) and White children had the highest percent receiving 'gold standard' tests (46.4%; other groups range: 35.6-43.2%). Children in low-income neighbourhoods had a lower percent of any test (62.5%) and 'gold standard' tests (39.4%) compared to medium (70.2% and 47.5%, respectively) and high (69.6% and 46.8%, respectively) income neighbourhoods. Children with intellectual disability had a lower percent of any ASD test (81.7%) and 'gold standard' tests (52.6%) compared to children without intellectual disability (84.0% and 57.6%, respectively).

Conclusions: Autism spectrum disorder testing practices vary widely by site and differ by race and presence of co-occurring intellectual disability, suggesting opportunities to standardise and/or improve autism spectrum disorder identification practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信