玻璃体旁切除术治疗视网膜外膜的术前视力阈值:系统回顾。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Bhadra U Pandya, Marko M Popovic, Nikhil S Patil, Sammy Al-Rubaie, Peter J Kertes, Rajeev H Muni
{"title":"玻璃体旁切除术治疗视网膜外膜的术前视力阈值:系统回顾。","authors":"Bhadra U Pandya, Marko M Popovic, Nikhil S Patil, Sammy Al-Rubaie, Peter J Kertes, Rajeev H Muni","doi":"10.3928/23258160-20240223-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This review consolidates findings from studies that used a preoperative visual acuity (VA) threshold as an indication for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was systematically searched using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to October 2022 to select studies reporting on pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM that used a preoperative VA threshold as an inclusion criterion. Primary outcomes were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included risk of intra- and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 639 eyes from seven studies were included. The most liberal preoperative VA threshold was 20/28.5 or worse, whereas the most conservative threshold was worse than 20/60. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (∼20/70), and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.35 logMAR (∼20/45). Generally, VA improved relative to baseline, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold. The smallest improvement in VA was observed in a study where the pre-operative VA to consider surgery was liberal (20/30 or worse), whereas the greatest VA improvement was observed in a study that used a conservative preoperative VA threshold (worse than 20/60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greatest improvement in BCVA was observed in studies where a conservative pre-operative VA threshold was used. The decision to operate should involve a patient-centered approach with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of PPV, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold used. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:400-407.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":19679,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","volume":" ","pages":"400-407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Visual Acuity Thresholds in Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Bhadra U Pandya, Marko M Popovic, Nikhil S Patil, Sammy Al-Rubaie, Peter J Kertes, Rajeev H Muni\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/23258160-20240223-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This review consolidates findings from studies that used a preoperative visual acuity (VA) threshold as an indication for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature was systematically searched using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to October 2022 to select studies reporting on pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM that used a preoperative VA threshold as an inclusion criterion. Primary outcomes were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included risk of intra- and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 639 eyes from seven studies were included. The most liberal preoperative VA threshold was 20/28.5 or worse, whereas the most conservative threshold was worse than 20/60. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (∼20/70), and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.35 logMAR (∼20/45). Generally, VA improved relative to baseline, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold. The smallest improvement in VA was observed in a study where the pre-operative VA to consider surgery was liberal (20/30 or worse), whereas the greatest VA improvement was observed in a study that used a conservative preoperative VA threshold (worse than 20/60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greatest improvement in BCVA was observed in studies where a conservative pre-operative VA threshold was used. The decision to operate should involve a patient-centered approach with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of PPV, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold used. <b>[<i>Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina</i> 2024;55:400-407.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"400-407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240223-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20240223-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本综述整合了将术前视力(VA)阈值作为视网膜外膜(ERM)手术指征的研究结果:方法:使用 Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 对 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月期间的文献进行了系统检索,以筛选出以术前视力阈值作为纳入标准的、报告了玻璃体旁切除术 (PPV) 治疗 ERM 的研究。主要结果是最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和BCVA相对于基线的变化。次要结果包括术中和术后并发症的风险:结果:共纳入了七项研究中的 639 只眼睛。最宽松的术前VA阈值为20/28.5或更差,而最保守的阈值为20/60或更差。术前 BCVA 的平均值为 0.55 最小解像角的对数(logMAR)(20/70∼),术后 BCVA 的平均值为 0.35 logMAR(20/45∼)。一般来说,无论术前视力阈值如何,视力都比基线有所提高。一项研究观察到的视力改善幅度最小的是术前视力阈值较宽松(20/30 或更差)的研究,而视力改善幅度最大的是采用保守的术前视力阈值(差于 20/60)的研究:结论:在采用保守的术前视力阈值的研究中,BCVA 的改善幅度最大。无论采用何种术前 VA 阈值,在决定是否进行手术时都应以患者为中心,对 PPV 的风险和益处进行充分讨论。[眼科手术激光成像视网膜2024;55:xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative Visual Acuity Thresholds in Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membrane: A Systematic Review.

Background and objective: This review consolidates findings from studies that used a preoperative visual acuity (VA) threshold as an indication for epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.

Methods: The literature was systematically searched using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to October 2022 to select studies reporting on pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for ERM that used a preoperative VA threshold as an inclusion criterion. Primary outcomes were final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and change in BCVA relative to baseline. Secondary outcomes included risk of intra- and postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 639 eyes from seven studies were included. The most liberal preoperative VA threshold was 20/28.5 or worse, whereas the most conservative threshold was worse than 20/60. The mean preoperative BCVA was 0.55 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (∼20/70), and the mean postoperative BCVA was 0.35 logMAR (∼20/45). Generally, VA improved relative to baseline, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold. The smallest improvement in VA was observed in a study where the pre-operative VA to consider surgery was liberal (20/30 or worse), whereas the greatest VA improvement was observed in a study that used a conservative preoperative VA threshold (worse than 20/60).

Conclusions: The greatest improvement in BCVA was observed in studies where a conservative pre-operative VA threshold was used. The decision to operate should involve a patient-centered approach with a thorough discussion of the risks and benefits of PPV, regardless of the preoperative VA threshold used. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:400-407.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: OSLI Retina focuses exclusively on retinal diseases, surgery and pharmacotherapy. OSLI Retina will offer an expedited submission to publication effort of peer-reviewed clinical science and case report articles. The front of the journal offers practical clinical and practice management features and columns specific to retina specialists. In sum, readers will find important peer-reviewed retina articles and the latest findings in techniques and science, as well as informative business and practice management features in one journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信