52 毫克左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器侧臂嵌入对出血和疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
P.A.H.H. van der Heijden , M.Y. Bongers , S. Veersema , J.P. Dieleman , P.M.A.J. Geomini
{"title":"52 毫克左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器侧臂嵌入对出血和疼痛的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"P.A.H.H. van der Heijden ,&nbsp;M.Y. Bongers ,&nbsp;S. Veersema ,&nbsp;J.P. Dieleman ,&nbsp;P.M.A.J. Geomini","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of embedment of side arms of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in the myometrium (assessed by three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS)) on uterine bleeding and pain.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We performed a prospective cohort study in a large Dutch teaching hospital between February 2015 and December 2016. Participants over 18 years of age who selected a LNG-IUD for contraception or because of heavy menstrual bleeding were eligible for inclusion. Six weeks after insertion, a 3D-TVUS was performed to diagnose embedment of the side arms. At that moment participants filled in questionnaires about their bleeding pattern and pelvic pain. Menstruation patterns ‘no bleeding’, ‘regular menstruation’, ‘sometimes a day of spotting (maximum once a week)’ were classified as <em>favourable bleeding pattern</em>. Menstruation patterns ‘heavy menstrual bleeding’, ‘several days a week bleeding days’, ‘several days a week spotting days’, ‘continuously spotting’, and ‘completely irregular cycle’ were classified as <em>unfavourable bleeding pattern</em>. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 %-confidence intervals (CI). The multivariate analysis included endometrial thickness, reason for insertion and parity. The analysis of pelvic pain additionally included previous insertion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 220 participants were evaluated for the study of whom 176 returned the questionnaires. Embedment of the side arms was observed in 43 of the 176 responding participants (24.4 %). Favourable bleeding pattern was reported by 25/43 (58.1 %) participants with embedment and 53/133 (39.8 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 1.8, 95 % CI 0.9–3.9). Pelvic pain was reported by 4/43 (9.3 %) participants with embedment and 24/133 (18.1 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 0.3; CI 0.1–1.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present study suggests that embedment of the side arms of the LNG-IUD in the myometrium assessed by 3D-TVUS is not associated with a unfavourable bleeding pattern nor pelvic pain six weeks after insertion. From this point of view, we do not recommend to perform standard 3D-TVUS for the purpose of excluding or demonstrating embedment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"53 6","pages":"Article 102777"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of embedment of the side arms of 52 mg levonorgestrel-intrauterine device on bleeding and pain: A prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"P.A.H.H. van der Heijden ,&nbsp;M.Y. Bongers ,&nbsp;S. Veersema ,&nbsp;J.P. Dieleman ,&nbsp;P.M.A.J. Geomini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of embedment of side arms of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in the myometrium (assessed by three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS)) on uterine bleeding and pain.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We performed a prospective cohort study in a large Dutch teaching hospital between February 2015 and December 2016. Participants over 18 years of age who selected a LNG-IUD for contraception or because of heavy menstrual bleeding were eligible for inclusion. Six weeks after insertion, a 3D-TVUS was performed to diagnose embedment of the side arms. At that moment participants filled in questionnaires about their bleeding pattern and pelvic pain. Menstruation patterns ‘no bleeding’, ‘regular menstruation’, ‘sometimes a day of spotting (maximum once a week)’ were classified as <em>favourable bleeding pattern</em>. Menstruation patterns ‘heavy menstrual bleeding’, ‘several days a week bleeding days’, ‘several days a week spotting days’, ‘continuously spotting’, and ‘completely irregular cycle’ were classified as <em>unfavourable bleeding pattern</em>. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 %-confidence intervals (CI). The multivariate analysis included endometrial thickness, reason for insertion and parity. The analysis of pelvic pain additionally included previous insertion.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 220 participants were evaluated for the study of whom 176 returned the questionnaires. Embedment of the side arms was observed in 43 of the 176 responding participants (24.4 %). Favourable bleeding pattern was reported by 25/43 (58.1 %) participants with embedment and 53/133 (39.8 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 1.8, 95 % CI 0.9–3.9). Pelvic pain was reported by 4/43 (9.3 %) participants with embedment and 24/133 (18.1 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 0.3; CI 0.1–1.2).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The present study suggests that embedment of the side arms of the LNG-IUD in the myometrium assessed by 3D-TVUS is not associated with a unfavourable bleeding pattern nor pelvic pain six weeks after insertion. From this point of view, we do not recommend to perform standard 3D-TVUS for the purpose of excluding or demonstrating embedment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102777\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000552\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784724000552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在分析左炔诺孕酮52毫克宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)侧臂嵌入子宫肌层(通过三维经阴道超声(3D-TVUS)评估)对子宫出血和疼痛的影响:我们于 2015 年 2 月至 2016 年 12 月在一家大型荷兰教学医院进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。年满 18 岁、因避孕或月经大量出血而选择 LNG-IUD 的参与者均符合纳入条件。放置六周后,进行3D-TVUS检查以诊断侧臂嵌入。此时,参与者填写了有关出血模式和盆腔疼痛的调查问卷。无出血"、"月经规律"、"有时一天点滴出血(最多一周一次)"的月经模式被归类为良好的出血模式。大量月经出血"、"一周有几天出血"、"一周有几天点滴出血"、"持续点滴出血 "和 "周期完全不规则 "等月经模式被归类为不利的出血模式。采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来计算几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)。多变量分析包括子宫内膜厚度、置入原因和胎次。骨盆疼痛的分析还包括之前的置入情况:本研究共评估了 220 名参与者,其中 176 人返回了调查问卷。在 176 位答复者中,有 43 位(24.4%)观察到侧臂嵌入。25/43(58.1%)的参与者报告了有利的出血模式,53/133(39.8%)的参与者未报告出血模式(ORadj 1.8,95% CI 0.9-3.9)。有 4/43 (9.3%)人报告骨盆疼痛,24/133 (18.1%)人未报告骨盆疼痛(ORadj 0.3;CI 0.1-1.2):本研究表明,3D-TVUS 评估的 LNG-IUD 侧臂嵌入子宫肌层与插入后六周的不良出血模式或盆腔疼痛无关。因此,我们不建议为排除或显示嵌入而进行标准 3D-TVUS 检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of embedment of the side arms of 52 mg levonorgestrel-intrauterine device on bleeding and pain: A prospective cohort study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of embedment of side arms of the levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) in the myometrium (assessed by three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVUS)) on uterine bleeding and pain.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective cohort study in a large Dutch teaching hospital between February 2015 and December 2016. Participants over 18 years of age who selected a LNG-IUD for contraception or because of heavy menstrual bleeding were eligible for inclusion. Six weeks after insertion, a 3D-TVUS was performed to diagnose embedment of the side arms. At that moment participants filled in questionnaires about their bleeding pattern and pelvic pain. Menstruation patterns ‘no bleeding’, ‘regular menstruation’, ‘sometimes a day of spotting (maximum once a week)’ were classified as favourable bleeding pattern. Menstruation patterns ‘heavy menstrual bleeding’, ‘several days a week bleeding days’, ‘several days a week spotting days’, ‘continuously spotting’, and ‘completely irregular cycle’ were classified as unfavourable bleeding pattern. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 %-confidence intervals (CI). The multivariate analysis included endometrial thickness, reason for insertion and parity. The analysis of pelvic pain additionally included previous insertion.

Results

A total of 220 participants were evaluated for the study of whom 176 returned the questionnaires. Embedment of the side arms was observed in 43 of the 176 responding participants (24.4 %). Favourable bleeding pattern was reported by 25/43 (58.1 %) participants with embedment and 53/133 (39.8 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 1.8, 95 % CI 0.9–3.9). Pelvic pain was reported by 4/43 (9.3 %) participants with embedment and 24/133 (18.1 %) participants without embedment (ORadj 0.3; CI 0.1–1.2).

Conclusions

The present study suggests that embedment of the side arms of the LNG-IUD in the myometrium assessed by 3D-TVUS is not associated with a unfavourable bleeding pattern nor pelvic pain six weeks after insertion. From this point of view, we do not recommend to perform standard 3D-TVUS for the purpose of excluding or demonstrating embedment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信