{"title":"造血干细胞移植治疗小儿镰状细胞病的有效性:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Najim Z. Alshahrani, Mohammed R. Algethami","doi":"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have just one recognized curative therapy option: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which results in a long-lasting improvement in the clinical phenotype. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSCT in treating children with SCD by a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Up until January 2024, a comprehensive search was done using Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Two reviewers worked separately to extract the data, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool was used to assess the research's quality. The outcomes analyzed were Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), graft failure (GF) and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen papers satisfied our inclusion requirements and were assessed to be of fair quality. The pooled rate of OS was high (92%; 95% CI: 90.3%–93.5%). Similar finding was detected for EFS (85.8%; 95% CI: 83.7%–87.7%). In the other hand, pooled rates of GF and mortality were 6.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–8.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5%–10.7%), respectively. A significant publication bias was detected for OS, EFS and GF outcomes. Subgroups analysis showed that study design was the major source of heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results show that HSCT is effective and safe, with pooled survival rates above 90%. It is important to assess innovative tactics in light of the alarming GF and mortality rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"32 5","pages":"Article 102049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999/pdfft?md5=948fb29cf0a8dcdee8655b43ab9b3546&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424000999-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treating pediatric sickle cell disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Najim Z. Alshahrani, Mohammed R. Algethami\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have just one recognized curative therapy option: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which results in a long-lasting improvement in the clinical phenotype. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSCT in treating children with SCD by a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Up until January 2024, a comprehensive search was done using Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Two reviewers worked separately to extract the data, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool was used to assess the research's quality. The outcomes analyzed were Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), graft failure (GF) and mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nineteen papers satisfied our inclusion requirements and were assessed to be of fair quality. The pooled rate of OS was high (92%; 95% CI: 90.3%–93.5%). Similar finding was detected for EFS (85.8%; 95% CI: 83.7%–87.7%). In the other hand, pooled rates of GF and mortality were 6.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–8.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5%–10.7%), respectively. A significant publication bias was detected for OS, EFS and GF outcomes. Subgroups analysis showed that study design was the major source of heterogeneity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results show that HSCT is effective and safe, with pooled survival rates above 90%. It is important to assess innovative tactics in light of the alarming GF and mortality rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 102049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999/pdfft?md5=948fb29cf0a8dcdee8655b43ab9b3546&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424000999-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424000999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景镰状细胞病(SCD)患者只有一种公认的治愈性疗法:造血干细胞移植(HSCT),它能长期改善临床表型。在此,我们通过系统综述和荟萃分析评估了造血干细胞移植治疗SCD患儿的有效性。方法截至2024年1月,我们使用Web of Science、CINAHL、Embase、Google Scholar、Cochrane Library、PubMed/Medline和Embase进行了全面检索。两名审稿人分别提取数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估工具评估研究质量。分析的结果包括总生存率(OS)、无事件生存率(EFS)、移植物失败率(GF)和死亡率。总的 OS 率较高(92%;95% CI:90.3%-93.5%)。EFS也有类似结果(85.8%;95% CI:83.7%-87.7%)。另一方面,GF和死亡率的汇总率分别为6.9%(95% CI:5.3%-8.9%)和7.4%(95% CI:5%-10.7%)。在OS、EFS和GF结果中发现了明显的发表偏倚。亚组分析表明,研究设计是异质性的主要来源。结论我们的研究结果表明,造血干细胞移植有效且安全,总生存率超过90%。鉴于令人担忧的 GF 和死亡率,评估创新策略非常重要。
The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in treating pediatric sickle cell disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) have just one recognized curative therapy option: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), which results in a long-lasting improvement in the clinical phenotype. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSCT in treating children with SCD by a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods
Up until January 2024, a comprehensive search was done using Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, and Embase. Two reviewers worked separately to extract the data, and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool was used to assess the research's quality. The outcomes analyzed were Overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), graft failure (GF) and mortality.
Results
Nineteen papers satisfied our inclusion requirements and were assessed to be of fair quality. The pooled rate of OS was high (92%; 95% CI: 90.3%–93.5%). Similar finding was detected for EFS (85.8%; 95% CI: 83.7%–87.7%). In the other hand, pooled rates of GF and mortality were 6.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–8.9%) and 7.4% (95% CI: 5%–10.7%), respectively. A significant publication bias was detected for OS, EFS and GF outcomes. Subgroups analysis showed that study design was the major source of heterogeneity.
Conclusion
Our results show that HSCT is effective and safe, with pooled survival rates above 90%. It is important to assess innovative tactics in light of the alarming GF and mortality rates.
期刊介绍:
The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.