化学计算参数--是否需要统一?

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Pub Date : 2016-08-01
David Hughes, James Cg Doery, Kay Weng Choy, Robert Flatman
{"title":"化学计算参数--是否需要统一?","authors":"David Hughes, James Cg Doery, Kay Weng Choy, Robert Flatman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In clinical chemistry, harmonisation of the testing process is a global initiative with the purpose of improving patient safety, allowing better integration of research data and enabling the use of national electronic heath records. In Australia, as in other countries, the initial focus has been on the harmonisation of the more commonly measured analytes. There are also a number of calculated parameters, derived from these measured analytes, which could also be considered for harmonisation. Calculated parameters that are reported by laboratories and used for clinical decision-making should undergo the same robust process of harmonisation as is the case for the measured analytes. Aspects that should be considered for harmonisation are: terminology, the formulae used and where possible the use of common reference intervals. To investigate pathways towards the harmonisation of calculated parameters, three commonly reported parameters are considered. Calculated osmolality, the anion gap and albumin-adjusted calcium are all derived from common analytes which have individually been considered for harmonisation. They present different methodological, measurement uncertainty and terminological hurdles to harmonisation and are likely to require different pathways and solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34924,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","volume":"37 3","pages":"131-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculated Chemistry Parameters - do they need to be harmonised?\",\"authors\":\"David Hughes, James Cg Doery, Kay Weng Choy, Robert Flatman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In clinical chemistry, harmonisation of the testing process is a global initiative with the purpose of improving patient safety, allowing better integration of research data and enabling the use of national electronic heath records. In Australia, as in other countries, the initial focus has been on the harmonisation of the more commonly measured analytes. There are also a number of calculated parameters, derived from these measured analytes, which could also be considered for harmonisation. Calculated parameters that are reported by laboratories and used for clinical decision-making should undergo the same robust process of harmonisation as is the case for the measured analytes. Aspects that should be considered for harmonisation are: terminology, the formulae used and where possible the use of common reference intervals. To investigate pathways towards the harmonisation of calculated parameters, three commonly reported parameters are considered. Calculated osmolality, the anion gap and albumin-adjusted calcium are all derived from common analytes which have individually been considered for harmonisation. They present different methodological, measurement uncertainty and terminological hurdles to harmonisation and are likely to require different pathways and solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"131-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Biochemist Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biochemist Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床化学领域,统一检测流程是一项全球性举措,其目的是提高患者安全,更好地整合研究数据,并促进国家电子病历的使用。在澳大利亚,与其他国家一样,最初的重点是统一更常见的测量分析物。此外,还有一些由这些测量分析物推导出的计算参数也可以考虑进行统一。由实验室报告并用于临床决策的计算参数也应与测量分析物一样,经过严格的协调过程。应考虑统一的方面包括:术语、所用公式以及在可能的情况下使用通用参考区间。为了研究统一计算参数的途径,我们考虑了三个常见的报告参数。计算渗透压、阴离子间隙和白蛋白调整钙都来自常见的分析物,这些分析物已被单独考虑进行统一。它们在方法学、测量不确定性和术语方面存在不同的统一障碍,可能需要不同的途径和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculated Chemistry Parameters - do they need to be harmonised?

In clinical chemistry, harmonisation of the testing process is a global initiative with the purpose of improving patient safety, allowing better integration of research data and enabling the use of national electronic heath records. In Australia, as in other countries, the initial focus has been on the harmonisation of the more commonly measured analytes. There are also a number of calculated parameters, derived from these measured analytes, which could also be considered for harmonisation. Calculated parameters that are reported by laboratories and used for clinical decision-making should undergo the same robust process of harmonisation as is the case for the measured analytes. Aspects that should be considered for harmonisation are: terminology, the formulae used and where possible the use of common reference intervals. To investigate pathways towards the harmonisation of calculated parameters, three commonly reported parameters are considered. Calculated osmolality, the anion gap and albumin-adjusted calcium are all derived from common analytes which have individually been considered for harmonisation. They present different methodological, measurement uncertainty and terminological hurdles to harmonisation and are likely to require different pathways and solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biochemist Reviews
Clinical Biochemist Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信