直肠癌化疗后 MRI 对肿瘤完全反应的解读:多中心临床实践中读片者之间的一致性及相关因素

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hae Young Kim, Seung Hyun Cho, Jong Keon Jang, Bohyun Kim, Chul-Min Lee, Joon Seok Lim, Sung Kyoung Moon, Soon Nam Oh, Nieun Seo, Seong Ho Park
{"title":"直肠癌化疗后 MRI 对肿瘤完全反应的解读:多中心临床实践中读片者之间的一致性及相关因素","authors":"Hae Young Kim, Seung Hyun Cho, Jong Keon Jang, Bohyun Kim, Chul-Min Lee, Joon Seok Lim, Sung Kyoung Moon, Soon Nam Oh, Nieun Seo, Seong Ho Park","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2023.1213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure inter-reader agreement and identify associated factors in interpreting complete response (CR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 10 readers from seven hospitals with experience of 80-10210 cases, and 149 patients who underwent surgery after CRT for rectal cancer. Using MRI-based tumor regression grading (mrTRG) and methods employed in daily practice, the readers independently assessed mrTRG, CR on T2-weighted images (T2WI) denoted as mrCR<sub>T2W</sub>, and CR on all images including diffusion-weighted images (DWI) denoted as mrCR<sub>overall</sub>. The readers described their interpretation patterns and how they utilized DWI. Inter-reader agreement was measured using multi-rater kappa, and associated factors were analyzed using multivariable regression. Correlation between sensitivity and specificity of each reader was analyzed using Spearman coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mrCR<sub>T2W</sub> and mrCR<sub>overall</sub> rates varied widely among the readers, ranging 18.8%-40.3% and 18.1%-34.9%, respectively. Nine readers used DWI as a supplement sequence, which modified interpretations on T2WI in 2.7% of cases (36/1341 [149 patients × 9 readers]) and mostly (33/36) changed mrCR<sub>T2W</sub> to non-mrCR<sub>overall</sub>. The kappa values for mrTRG, mrCR<sub>T2W</sub>, and mrCR<sub>overall</sub> were 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 0.62), 0.55 (0.52, 0.57), and 0.54 (0.51, 0.57), respectively. No use of rectal gel, larger initial tumor size, and higher initial cT stage exhibited significant association with a higher inter-reader agreement for assessing mrCR<sub>overall</sub> (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.042). Strong negative correlations were observed between the sensitivity and specificity of individual readers (coefficient, -0.718 to -0.963; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-reader agreement was moderate for assessing CR on post-CRT MRI. Readers' varying standards on MRI interpretation (i.e., threshold effect), along with the use of rectal gel, initial tumor size, and initial cT stage, were significant factors associated with inter-reader agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"25 4","pages":"351-362"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation of Complete Tumor Response on MRI Following Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Reader Agreement and Associated Factors in Multi-Center Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Hae Young Kim, Seung Hyun Cho, Jong Keon Jang, Bohyun Kim, Chul-Min Lee, Joon Seok Lim, Sung Kyoung Moon, Soon Nam Oh, Nieun Seo, Seong Ho Park\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/kjr.2023.1213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure inter-reader agreement and identify associated factors in interpreting complete response (CR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 10 readers from seven hospitals with experience of 80-10210 cases, and 149 patients who underwent surgery after CRT for rectal cancer. Using MRI-based tumor regression grading (mrTRG) and methods employed in daily practice, the readers independently assessed mrTRG, CR on T2-weighted images (T2WI) denoted as mrCR<sub>T2W</sub>, and CR on all images including diffusion-weighted images (DWI) denoted as mrCR<sub>overall</sub>. The readers described their interpretation patterns and how they utilized DWI. Inter-reader agreement was measured using multi-rater kappa, and associated factors were analyzed using multivariable regression. Correlation between sensitivity and specificity of each reader was analyzed using Spearman coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mrCR<sub>T2W</sub> and mrCR<sub>overall</sub> rates varied widely among the readers, ranging 18.8%-40.3% and 18.1%-34.9%, respectively. Nine readers used DWI as a supplement sequence, which modified interpretations on T2WI in 2.7% of cases (36/1341 [149 patients × 9 readers]) and mostly (33/36) changed mrCR<sub>T2W</sub> to non-mrCR<sub>overall</sub>. The kappa values for mrTRG, mrCR<sub>T2W</sub>, and mrCR<sub>overall</sub> were 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 0.62), 0.55 (0.52, 0.57), and 0.54 (0.51, 0.57), respectively. No use of rectal gel, larger initial tumor size, and higher initial cT stage exhibited significant association with a higher inter-reader agreement for assessing mrCR<sub>overall</sub> (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.042). Strong negative correlations were observed between the sensitivity and specificity of individual readers (coefficient, -0.718 to -0.963; <i>P</i> ≤ 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-reader agreement was moderate for assessing CR on post-CRT MRI. Readers' varying standards on MRI interpretation (i.e., threshold effect), along with the use of rectal gel, initial tumor size, and initial cT stage, were significant factors associated with inter-reader agreement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"351-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973736/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.1213\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.1213","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要测量解读直肠癌化放疗(CRT)后磁共振成像(MRI)完全反应(CR)的读片者之间的一致性并确定相关因素:这项回顾性研究涉及来自 7 家医院的 10 位阅读者,他们拥有 80-10210 例病例的经验,以及 149 名直肠癌 CRT 后接受手术的患者。阅读者使用基于 MRI 的肿瘤回归分级(mrTRG)和日常实践中使用的方法,独立评估了 mrTRG、T2 加权图像(T2WI)上的 CR(表示为 mrCRT2W)和所有图像(包括弥散加权图像(DWI))上的 CR(表示为 mrCRoverall)。阅读者描述了他们的判读模式以及如何利用 DWI。读片者之间的一致性采用多评分者卡帕(multi-rater kappa)进行测量,相关因素采用多变量回归进行分析。使用斯皮尔曼系数分析了每位读者的敏感性和特异性之间的相关性:不同读者的 mrCRT2W 和 mrCRoverall 率差异很大,分别为 18.8%-40.3% 和 18.1%-34.9% 。九位读者使用 DWI 作为补充序列,这改变了 2.7% 的病例(36/1341 [149 名患者 × 9 位读者])对 T2WI 的解释,大部分病例(33/36)将 mrCRT2W 改为非 mrCRoverall。mrTRG、mrCRT2W 和 mrCRoverall 的 kappa 值分别为 0.56(95% 置信区间:0.49,0.62)、0.55(0.52,0.57)和 0.54(0.51,0.57)。未使用直肠凝胶、初始肿瘤尺寸较大和初始 cT 分期较高与评估 mrCRoverall 的读片者间一致性较高有显著相关性(P ≤ 0.042)。各个读者的灵敏度和特异性之间呈强负相关(系数,-0.718 至 -0.963;P ≤ 0.019):结论:在评估CRT后磁共振成像的CR时,读者之间的一致性为中等。读者对 MRI 解读的不同标准(即阈值效应)以及直肠凝胶的使用、初始肿瘤大小和初始 cT 分期是影响读者间一致性的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretation of Complete Tumor Response on MRI Following Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer: Inter-Reader Agreement and Associated Factors in Multi-Center Clinical Practice.

Objective: To measure inter-reader agreement and identify associated factors in interpreting complete response (CR) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study involved 10 readers from seven hospitals with experience of 80-10210 cases, and 149 patients who underwent surgery after CRT for rectal cancer. Using MRI-based tumor regression grading (mrTRG) and methods employed in daily practice, the readers independently assessed mrTRG, CR on T2-weighted images (T2WI) denoted as mrCRT2W, and CR on all images including diffusion-weighted images (DWI) denoted as mrCRoverall. The readers described their interpretation patterns and how they utilized DWI. Inter-reader agreement was measured using multi-rater kappa, and associated factors were analyzed using multivariable regression. Correlation between sensitivity and specificity of each reader was analyzed using Spearman coefficient.

Results: The mrCRT2W and mrCRoverall rates varied widely among the readers, ranging 18.8%-40.3% and 18.1%-34.9%, respectively. Nine readers used DWI as a supplement sequence, which modified interpretations on T2WI in 2.7% of cases (36/1341 [149 patients × 9 readers]) and mostly (33/36) changed mrCRT2W to non-mrCRoverall. The kappa values for mrTRG, mrCRT2W, and mrCRoverall were 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 0.62), 0.55 (0.52, 0.57), and 0.54 (0.51, 0.57), respectively. No use of rectal gel, larger initial tumor size, and higher initial cT stage exhibited significant association with a higher inter-reader agreement for assessing mrCRoverall (P ≤ 0.042). Strong negative correlations were observed between the sensitivity and specificity of individual readers (coefficient, -0.718 to -0.963; P ≤ 0.019).

Conclusion: Inter-reader agreement was moderate for assessing CR on post-CRT MRI. Readers' varying standards on MRI interpretation (i.e., threshold effect), along with the use of rectal gel, initial tumor size, and initial cT stage, were significant factors associated with inter-reader agreement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信