确定土壤保护战略:砷(As)的生态风险阈值和土壤特性的影响

Yihang Huang , Naichi Zhang , Zixuan Ge , Chen Lv , Linfang Zhu , Changfeng Ding , Cun Liu , Peiqin Peng , Tongliang Wu , Yujun Wang
{"title":"确定土壤保护战略:砷(As)的生态风险阈值和土壤特性的影响","authors":"Yihang Huang ,&nbsp;Naichi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zixuan Ge ,&nbsp;Chen Lv ,&nbsp;Linfang Zhu ,&nbsp;Changfeng Ding ,&nbsp;Cun Liu ,&nbsp;Peiqin Peng ,&nbsp;Tongliang Wu ,&nbsp;Yujun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eehl.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The establishment of ecological risk thresholds for arsenic (As) plays a pivotal role in developing soil conservation strategies. However, despite many studies regarding the toxicological profile of As, such thresholds varying by diverse soil properties have rarely been established. This study aims to address this gap by compiling and critically examining an extensive dataset of As toxicity data sourced from existing literature. Furthermore, to augment the existing information, experimental studies on As toxicity focusing on barley-root elongation were carried out across various soil types. The As concentrations varied from 12.01 to 437.25 mg/kg for the effective concentrations that inhibited 10% of barley-root growth (EC<sub>10</sub>). The present study applied a machine-learning approach to investigate the complex associations between the toxicity thresholds of As and diverse soil properties. The results revealed that Mn-/Fe-ox and clay content emerged as the most influential factors in predicting the EC<sub>10</sub> contribution. Additionally, by using a species sensitivity distribution model and toxicity data from 21 different species, the hazardous concentration for x% of species (HCx) was calculated for four representative soil scenarios. The HC5 values for acidic, neutral, alkaline, and alkaline calcareous soils were 80, 47, 40, and 28 mg/kg, respectively. This study establishes an evidence-based methodology for deriving soil-specific guidance concerning As toxicity thresholds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29813,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Environment & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000243/pdfft?md5=3ebe391bc5038ba05c156560f6904102&pid=1-s2.0-S2772985024000243-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining soil conservation strategies: Ecological risk thresholds of arsenic and the influence of soil properties\",\"authors\":\"Yihang Huang ,&nbsp;Naichi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zixuan Ge ,&nbsp;Chen Lv ,&nbsp;Linfang Zhu ,&nbsp;Changfeng Ding ,&nbsp;Cun Liu ,&nbsp;Peiqin Peng ,&nbsp;Tongliang Wu ,&nbsp;Yujun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eehl.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The establishment of ecological risk thresholds for arsenic (As) plays a pivotal role in developing soil conservation strategies. However, despite many studies regarding the toxicological profile of As, such thresholds varying by diverse soil properties have rarely been established. This study aims to address this gap by compiling and critically examining an extensive dataset of As toxicity data sourced from existing literature. Furthermore, to augment the existing information, experimental studies on As toxicity focusing on barley-root elongation were carried out across various soil types. The As concentrations varied from 12.01 to 437.25 mg/kg for the effective concentrations that inhibited 10% of barley-root growth (EC<sub>10</sub>). The present study applied a machine-learning approach to investigate the complex associations between the toxicity thresholds of As and diverse soil properties. The results revealed that Mn-/Fe-ox and clay content emerged as the most influential factors in predicting the EC<sub>10</sub> contribution. Additionally, by using a species sensitivity distribution model and toxicity data from 21 different species, the hazardous concentration for x% of species (HCx) was calculated for four representative soil scenarios. The HC5 values for acidic, neutral, alkaline, and alkaline calcareous soils were 80, 47, 40, and 28 mg/kg, respectively. This study establishes an evidence-based methodology for deriving soil-specific guidance concerning As toxicity thresholds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eco-Environment & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000243/pdfft?md5=3ebe391bc5038ba05c156560f6904102&pid=1-s2.0-S2772985024000243-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eco-Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772985024000243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

砷(As)生态风险阈值的确定在制定土壤保护战略中起着至关重要的作用。然而,尽管对砷的毒理学特征进行了许多研究,但却很少建立因不同土壤特性而异的阈值。本研究旨在通过汇编和批判性地检查从现有文献中获取的大量砷毒性数据集来填补这一空白。此外,为了扩充现有信息,还在不同类型的土壤中开展了以大麦根伸长为重点的砷毒性实验研究。抑制大麦根系生长 10% 的有效浓度(EC10)为 12.01 至 437.25 mg/kg。本研究采用机器学习方法研究了砷的毒性阈值与不同土壤特性之间的复杂关联。结果显示,Mn-/Fe-ox 和粘土含量是预测 EC10 贡献值的最有影响力的因素。此外,利用物种敏感性分布模型和 21 种不同物种的毒性数据,计算了四种代表性土壤情况下 x% 物种的有害浓度(HCx)。酸性、中性、碱性和碱性石灰性土壤的 HC5 值分别为 80、47、40 和 28 毫克/千克。这项研究确立了一种基于证据的方法,用于得出针对特定土壤的砷毒性阈值指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Determining soil conservation strategies: Ecological risk thresholds of arsenic and the influence of soil properties

Determining soil conservation strategies: Ecological risk thresholds of arsenic and the influence of soil properties

The establishment of ecological risk thresholds for arsenic (As) plays a pivotal role in developing soil conservation strategies. However, despite many studies regarding the toxicological profile of As, such thresholds varying by diverse soil properties have rarely been established. This study aims to address this gap by compiling and critically examining an extensive dataset of As toxicity data sourced from existing literature. Furthermore, to augment the existing information, experimental studies on As toxicity focusing on barley-root elongation were carried out across various soil types. The As concentrations varied from 12.01 to 437.25 mg/kg for the effective concentrations that inhibited 10% of barley-root growth (EC10). The present study applied a machine-learning approach to investigate the complex associations between the toxicity thresholds of As and diverse soil properties. The results revealed that Mn-/Fe-ox and clay content emerged as the most influential factors in predicting the EC10 contribution. Additionally, by using a species sensitivity distribution model and toxicity data from 21 different species, the hazardous concentration for x% of species (HCx) was calculated for four representative soil scenarios. The HC5 values for acidic, neutral, alkaline, and alkaline calcareous soils were 80, 47, 40, and 28 mg/kg, respectively. This study establishes an evidence-based methodology for deriving soil-specific guidance concerning As toxicity thresholds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eco-Environment & Health
Eco-Environment & Health 环境科学与生态学-生态、环境与健康
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Eco-Environment & Health (EEH) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal designed for publications on the frontiers of the ecology, environment and health as well as their related disciplines. EEH focuses on the concept of “One Health” to promote green and sustainable development, dealing with the interactions among ecology, environment and health, and the underlying mechanisms and interventions. Our mission is to be one of the most important flagship journals in the field of environmental health. Scopes EEH covers a variety of research areas, including but not limited to ecology and biodiversity conservation, environmental behaviors and bioprocesses of emerging contaminants, human exposure and health effects, and evaluation, management and regulation of environmental risks. The key topics of EEH include: 1) Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation Biodiversity Ecological restoration Ecological safety Protected area 2) Environmental and Biological Fate of Emerging Contaminants Environmental behaviors Environmental processes Environmental microbiology 3) Human Exposure and Health Effects Environmental toxicology Environmental epidemiology Environmental health risk Food safety 4) Evaluation, Management and Regulation of Environmental Risks Chemical safety Environmental policy Health policy Health economics Environmental remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信