空中医疗儿科快速插管描述性分析:成功与机遇

Q3 Nursing
Daniel P. Davis MD , Kira Chandran MD , Jennifer Noce CCT, EMT-P
{"title":"空中医疗儿科快速插管描述性分析:成功与机遇","authors":"Daniel P. Davis MD ,&nbsp;Kira Chandran MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Noce CCT, EMT-P","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Advanced airway management, including the use of rapid sequence intubation (RSI), is fundamental in resuscitation. However, the reported experience with pediatric airway management is limited because of the relatively low number of emergency RSI procedures in children. The aim of this study was to document the experience with pediatric RSI in a large air medical database and explore opportunities for improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All pediatric patients (age &lt; 18 years) undergoing RSI by air medical crews between 2015 and 2019 were included in this analysis. Subjects were divided a priori into 3 age subgroups (0-2 years, 3-8 years, and 9-17 years). The primary variables of interest included overall intubation success, first-attempt intubation success, and first-attempt intubation success without desaturation. The rates of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) use for preoxygenation and oxygen desaturation were also explored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,091 pediatric RSI patients were included. The overall intubation success rate was 98% (0-2 years = 96%, 3-8 years = 97%, and 9-17 years = 98%), with 91% intubated on the first attempt (0-2 years = 86%, 3-8 years = 90%, and 9-17 years = 92%) and 87% intubated on the first attempt without oxygen desaturation (0-2 years = 80%, 3-8 years = 88%, and 9-17 years = 90%). A sharp decline in intubation success was observed with preoxygenation SpO<sub>2</sub> values &lt; 97% across all patients. Younger patients (0-2 years) had lower initial SpO<sub>2</sub> values and decreased first-attempt success rates with and without desaturation. These patients were less likely to receive PPV during preoxygenation attempts and had lower use of video laryngoscopy or a bougie on the initial intubation attempt.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we documented high success rates for air medical pediatric RSI. Higher target SpO<sub>2</sub> values may be justified during preoxygenation. Intubation success, PPV use for preoxygenation, video laryngoscopy, and the use of a bougie were lower for younger patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 3","pages":"Pages 210-215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Descriptive Analysis of Air Medical Pediatric Rapid Sequence Intubation: Successes and Opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P. Davis MD ,&nbsp;Kira Chandran MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Noce CCT, EMT-P\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Advanced airway management, including the use of rapid sequence intubation (RSI), is fundamental in resuscitation. However, the reported experience with pediatric airway management is limited because of the relatively low number of emergency RSI procedures in children. The aim of this study was to document the experience with pediatric RSI in a large air medical database and explore opportunities for improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All pediatric patients (age &lt; 18 years) undergoing RSI by air medical crews between 2015 and 2019 were included in this analysis. Subjects were divided a priori into 3 age subgroups (0-2 years, 3-8 years, and 9-17 years). The primary variables of interest included overall intubation success, first-attempt intubation success, and first-attempt intubation success without desaturation. The rates of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) use for preoxygenation and oxygen desaturation were also explored.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1,091 pediatric RSI patients were included. The overall intubation success rate was 98% (0-2 years = 96%, 3-8 years = 97%, and 9-17 years = 98%), with 91% intubated on the first attempt (0-2 years = 86%, 3-8 years = 90%, and 9-17 years = 92%) and 87% intubated on the first attempt without oxygen desaturation (0-2 years = 80%, 3-8 years = 88%, and 9-17 years = 90%). A sharp decline in intubation success was observed with preoxygenation SpO<sub>2</sub> values &lt; 97% across all patients. Younger patients (0-2 years) had lower initial SpO<sub>2</sub> values and decreased first-attempt success rates with and without desaturation. These patients were less likely to receive PPV during preoxygenation attempts and had lower use of video laryngoscopy or a bougie on the initial intubation attempt.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we documented high success rates for air medical pediatric RSI. Higher target SpO<sub>2</sub> values may be justified during preoxygenation. Intubation success, PPV use for preoxygenation, video laryngoscopy, and the use of a bougie were lower for younger patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 210-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标高级气道管理,包括使用快速顺序插管(RSI),是复苏的基础。然而,由于儿童紧急 RSI 程序的数量相对较少,因此报告的儿科气道管理经验有限。本研究旨在记录大型空中医疗数据库中的儿科 RSI 经验,并探索改进的机会。方法将 2015 年至 2019 年期间空中医疗机组接受 RSI 的所有儿科患者(年龄为 18 岁)纳入分析。受试者被事先分为 3 个年龄亚组(0-2 岁、3-8 岁和 9-17 岁)。关注的主要变量包括总体插管成功率、首次尝试插管成功率和首次尝试插管成功率(无失饱和)。此外,还探讨了正压通气(PPV)用于预吸氧和氧气饱和度降低的比率。总体插管成功率为 98%(0-2 岁 = 96%,3-8 岁 = 97%,9-17 岁 = 98%),其中 91% 的患者在首次尝试时插管成功(0-2 岁 = 86%,3-8 岁 = 90%,9-17 岁 = 92%),87% 的患者在首次尝试时插管成功且未出现氧饱和度降低(0-2 岁 = 80%,3-8 岁 = 88%,9-17 岁 = 90%)。在所有患者中,随着吸氧前 SpO2 值达到 97%,插管成功率急剧下降。年龄较小的患者(0-2 岁)初始 SpO2 值较低,无论有无脱饱和,首次尝试成功率都有所下降。在这项研究中,我们记录了空中医疗儿科 RSI 的高成功率。在预吸氧过程中,可能需要更高的目标 SpO2 值。年龄较小的患者的插管成功率、预吸氧的 PPV 使用率、视频喉镜检查和通气罩的使用率均较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Descriptive Analysis of Air Medical Pediatric Rapid Sequence Intubation: Successes and Opportunities

Objective

Advanced airway management, including the use of rapid sequence intubation (RSI), is fundamental in resuscitation. However, the reported experience with pediatric airway management is limited because of the relatively low number of emergency RSI procedures in children. The aim of this study was to document the experience with pediatric RSI in a large air medical database and explore opportunities for improvement.

Methods

All pediatric patients (age < 18 years) undergoing RSI by air medical crews between 2015 and 2019 were included in this analysis. Subjects were divided a priori into 3 age subgroups (0-2 years, 3-8 years, and 9-17 years). The primary variables of interest included overall intubation success, first-attempt intubation success, and first-attempt intubation success without desaturation. The rates of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) use for preoxygenation and oxygen desaturation were also explored.

Results

A total of 1,091 pediatric RSI patients were included. The overall intubation success rate was 98% (0-2 years = 96%, 3-8 years = 97%, and 9-17 years = 98%), with 91% intubated on the first attempt (0-2 years = 86%, 3-8 years = 90%, and 9-17 years = 92%) and 87% intubated on the first attempt without oxygen desaturation (0-2 years = 80%, 3-8 years = 88%, and 9-17 years = 90%). A sharp decline in intubation success was observed with preoxygenation SpO2 values < 97% across all patients. Younger patients (0-2 years) had lower initial SpO2 values and decreased first-attempt success rates with and without desaturation. These patients were less likely to receive PPV during preoxygenation attempts and had lower use of video laryngoscopy or a bougie on the initial intubation attempt.

Conclusion

In this study, we documented high success rates for air medical pediatric RSI. Higher target SpO2 values may be justified during preoxygenation. Intubation success, PPV use for preoxygenation, video laryngoscopy, and the use of a bougie were lower for younger patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信