Hoang Nguyen , Mary Hongying Cheng , Ji Young Lee , Shaili Aggarwal , Ole Valente Mortensen , Ivet Bahar
{"title":"血清素和多巴胺转运体的异构调节:来自计算和实验的新见解","authors":"Hoang Nguyen , Mary Hongying Cheng , Ji Young Lee , Shaili Aggarwal , Ole Valente Mortensen , Ivet Bahar","doi":"10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human monoamine transporters (MATs) are critical to regulating monoaminergic neurotransmission by translocating their substrates from the synaptic space back into the presynaptic neurons. As such, their primary substrate binding site S1 has been targeted by a wide range of compounds for treating neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders including depression, ADHD, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. We present here a comparative study of the structural dynamics and ligand-binding properties of two MATs, dopamine transporter (DAT) and serotonin transporter (SERT), with focus on the allosteric modulation of their transport function by drugs or substrates that consistently bind a secondary site S2, proposed to serve as an allosteric site. Our systematic analysis of the conformational space and dynamics of a dataset of 50 structures resolved for DAT and SERT in the presence of one or more ligands/drugs reveals the specific residues playing a consistent role in coordinating the small molecules bound to subsites S2–I and S2-II within S2, such as R476 and Y481 in dDAT and E494, P561, and F556 in hSERT. Further analysis reveals how DAT and SERT differ in their two principal modes of structural changes, PC1 and PC2. Notably, PC1 underlies the transition between outward- and inward-facing states of the transporters as well as their gating; whereas PC2 supports the rearrangements of TM helices near the S2 site. Finally, the examination of cross-correlations between structural elements lining the respective sites S1 and S2 point to the crucial role of coupled motions between TM6a and TM10. In particular, we note the involvement of hSERT residues F335 and G338, and E493-E494-T497 belonging to these two respective helices, in establishing the allosteric communication between S1 and S2. These results help understand the molecular basis of the action of drugs that bind to the S2 site of DAT or SERT. They also provide a basis for designing allosteric modulators that may provide better control of specific interactions and cellular pathways, rather than indiscriminately inhibiting the transporter by targeting its orthosteric site.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72753,"journal":{"name":"Current research in physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944124000099/pdfft?md5=bab9f4b69c42da5e6f1b25adf7d53f94&pid=1-s2.0-S2665944124000099-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allosteric modulation of serotonin and dopamine transporters: New insights from computations and experiments\",\"authors\":\"Hoang Nguyen , Mary Hongying Cheng , Ji Young Lee , Shaili Aggarwal , Ole Valente Mortensen , Ivet Bahar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crphys.2024.100125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Human monoamine transporters (MATs) are critical to regulating monoaminergic neurotransmission by translocating their substrates from the synaptic space back into the presynaptic neurons. As such, their primary substrate binding site S1 has been targeted by a wide range of compounds for treating neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders including depression, ADHD, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. We present here a comparative study of the structural dynamics and ligand-binding properties of two MATs, dopamine transporter (DAT) and serotonin transporter (SERT), with focus on the allosteric modulation of their transport function by drugs or substrates that consistently bind a secondary site S2, proposed to serve as an allosteric site. Our systematic analysis of the conformational space and dynamics of a dataset of 50 structures resolved for DAT and SERT in the presence of one or more ligands/drugs reveals the specific residues playing a consistent role in coordinating the small molecules bound to subsites S2–I and S2-II within S2, such as R476 and Y481 in dDAT and E494, P561, and F556 in hSERT. Further analysis reveals how DAT and SERT differ in their two principal modes of structural changes, PC1 and PC2. Notably, PC1 underlies the transition between outward- and inward-facing states of the transporters as well as their gating; whereas PC2 supports the rearrangements of TM helices near the S2 site. Finally, the examination of cross-correlations between structural elements lining the respective sites S1 and S2 point to the crucial role of coupled motions between TM6a and TM10. In particular, we note the involvement of hSERT residues F335 and G338, and E493-E494-T497 belonging to these two respective helices, in establishing the allosteric communication between S1 and S2. These results help understand the molecular basis of the action of drugs that bind to the S2 site of DAT or SERT. They also provide a basis for designing allosteric modulators that may provide better control of specific interactions and cellular pathways, rather than indiscriminately inhibiting the transporter by targeting its orthosteric site.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944124000099/pdfft?md5=bab9f4b69c42da5e6f1b25adf7d53f94&pid=1-s2.0-S2665944124000099-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944124000099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944124000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allosteric modulation of serotonin and dopamine transporters: New insights from computations and experiments
Human monoamine transporters (MATs) are critical to regulating monoaminergic neurotransmission by translocating their substrates from the synaptic space back into the presynaptic neurons. As such, their primary substrate binding site S1 has been targeted by a wide range of compounds for treating neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders including depression, ADHD, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. We present here a comparative study of the structural dynamics and ligand-binding properties of two MATs, dopamine transporter (DAT) and serotonin transporter (SERT), with focus on the allosteric modulation of their transport function by drugs or substrates that consistently bind a secondary site S2, proposed to serve as an allosteric site. Our systematic analysis of the conformational space and dynamics of a dataset of 50 structures resolved for DAT and SERT in the presence of one or more ligands/drugs reveals the specific residues playing a consistent role in coordinating the small molecules bound to subsites S2–I and S2-II within S2, such as R476 and Y481 in dDAT and E494, P561, and F556 in hSERT. Further analysis reveals how DAT and SERT differ in their two principal modes of structural changes, PC1 and PC2. Notably, PC1 underlies the transition between outward- and inward-facing states of the transporters as well as their gating; whereas PC2 supports the rearrangements of TM helices near the S2 site. Finally, the examination of cross-correlations between structural elements lining the respective sites S1 and S2 point to the crucial role of coupled motions between TM6a and TM10. In particular, we note the involvement of hSERT residues F335 and G338, and E493-E494-T497 belonging to these two respective helices, in establishing the allosteric communication between S1 and S2. These results help understand the molecular basis of the action of drugs that bind to the S2 site of DAT or SERT. They also provide a basis for designing allosteric modulators that may provide better control of specific interactions and cellular pathways, rather than indiscriminately inhibiting the transporter by targeting its orthosteric site.