{"title":"纳米填充树脂玻璃离子膜与树脂增强玻璃离子膜作为初级磨牙修复材料的比较","authors":"mohamed mansour, Mohamed Farag, shaymaa mahfouz","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2024.219258.1188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : Glass Ionomer Coating (GICs) are a special group of dental materials having some very unique properties. They adhere to slightly moist enamel and dentin without the need for any adhesive system, they release fluoride and thus have anticariogenic effects for an extended period, they can absorb and release fluoride from topical fluoride solutions, they have thermal expansion similar to enamel, and they are biocompatible with a low toxicity. Aim: the current study was to evaluate and compare; the clinical performance of GIC with surface coat versus resin modified GI restorations in primary molars in vivo. Materials and Methods: 24 children had bilateral carious class I molars fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. 48 molars were divided using split mouth technique into two groups; Equia-forte Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with glass ionomer (equia forte fil) followed by coating with (Equia forte coat) in the right side to all patients. Riva Lc Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with resin reinforced glass ionomer (Riva light cure) in the left side to all patients. All restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria at 1,3,6,9,12 months. Results: There was no significant difference between Equia forte fil and Riva Lc. Conclusion: Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations showed successful performance in class I cavities in primary molars after 1 year according to modified USPHS criteria, Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations could be used as variable options for restoring class I cavities in primary molars.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"179 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glass Ionomer Coating with Nano-filled Resin versus Resin Reinforced Glass Ionomer as a Restorative Materials for Primary Molars\",\"authors\":\"mohamed mansour, Mohamed Farag, shaymaa mahfouz\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/dsu.2024.219258.1188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : Glass Ionomer Coating (GICs) are a special group of dental materials having some very unique properties. They adhere to slightly moist enamel and dentin without the need for any adhesive system, they release fluoride and thus have anticariogenic effects for an extended period, they can absorb and release fluoride from topical fluoride solutions, they have thermal expansion similar to enamel, and they are biocompatible with a low toxicity. Aim: the current study was to evaluate and compare; the clinical performance of GIC with surface coat versus resin modified GI restorations in primary molars in vivo. Materials and Methods: 24 children had bilateral carious class I molars fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. 48 molars were divided using split mouth technique into two groups; Equia-forte Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with glass ionomer (equia forte fil) followed by coating with (Equia forte coat) in the right side to all patients. Riva Lc Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with resin reinforced glass ionomer (Riva light cure) in the left side to all patients. All restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria at 1,3,6,9,12 months. Results: There was no significant difference between Equia forte fil and Riva Lc. Conclusion: Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations showed successful performance in class I cavities in primary molars after 1 year according to modified USPHS criteria, Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations could be used as variable options for restoring class I cavities in primary molars.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.219258.1188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.219258.1188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:玻璃离子膜(GIC)是一类特殊的牙科材料,具有一些非常独特的特性。它们能粘附在微湿的牙釉质和牙本质上,无需任何粘接系统;它们能释放氟化物,因此具有长期的抗龋齿作用;它们能从局部氟化物溶液中吸收并释放氟化物;它们具有与牙釉质相似的热膨胀性;它们具有生物相容性,毒性低。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较带有表面涂层的 GIC 与树脂改性 GI 修复体在初级磨牙中的临床表现。材料和方法:选取符合纳入标准的 24 名儿童的双侧Ⅰ类龋坏磨牙。Equia-forte组:在所有患者的右侧24颗Ⅰ类龋齿基磨牙上填充玻璃离聚体(Equia forte fil),然后涂上(Equia forte coat)。Riva Lc 组:对所有患者的 24 颗Ⅰ类龋洞基磨牙左侧进行树脂强化玻璃离聚体(Riva 光固化)填充。根据修改后的 USPHS 标准,在 1、3、6、9、12 个月时对所有修复体进行评估。结果:Equia forte fil 和 Riva Lc 之间没有明显差异。结论:根据修改后的 USPHS 标准,Equia Forte 和 Riva LC 两种修复体在 1 年后均可成功修复初级磨牙的 I 类龋洞,Equia Forte 和 Riva LC 两种修复体均可作为修复初级磨牙 I 类龋洞的可变选择。
Glass Ionomer Coating with Nano-filled Resin versus Resin Reinforced Glass Ionomer as a Restorative Materials for Primary Molars
Introduction : Glass Ionomer Coating (GICs) are a special group of dental materials having some very unique properties. They adhere to slightly moist enamel and dentin without the need for any adhesive system, they release fluoride and thus have anticariogenic effects for an extended period, they can absorb and release fluoride from topical fluoride solutions, they have thermal expansion similar to enamel, and they are biocompatible with a low toxicity. Aim: the current study was to evaluate and compare; the clinical performance of GIC with surface coat versus resin modified GI restorations in primary molars in vivo. Materials and Methods: 24 children had bilateral carious class I molars fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected. 48 molars were divided using split mouth technique into two groups; Equia-forte Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with glass ionomer (equia forte fil) followed by coating with (Equia forte coat) in the right side to all patients. Riva Lc Group : 24 primary molar teeth with class I cavities were filled with resin reinforced glass ionomer (Riva light cure) in the left side to all patients. All restorations were evaluated according to modified USPHS criteria at 1,3,6,9,12 months. Results: There was no significant difference between Equia forte fil and Riva Lc. Conclusion: Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations showed successful performance in class I cavities in primary molars after 1 year according to modified USPHS criteria, Both Equia Forte and Riva LC restorations could be used as variable options for restoring class I cavities in primary molars.