增强型肝纤维化(ELF)评分可预测肝功能失代偿和死亡率

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Madeline Pearson , Jennifer Nobes , Iain Macpherson , Lucy Gold , Michael Miller , Ellie Dow , John F. Dillon
{"title":"增强型肝纤维化(ELF)评分可预测肝功能失代偿和死亡率","authors":"Madeline Pearson ,&nbsp;Jennifer Nobes ,&nbsp;Iain Macpherson ,&nbsp;Lucy Gold ,&nbsp;Michael Miller ,&nbsp;Ellie Dow ,&nbsp;John F. Dillon","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934–2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674–2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% <em>vs.</em> 82.8% at six months). Where FIB-4 was indeterminate, ELF had higher AUC for all outcomes within at least 2 years. ELF ≥13 was associated with particularly high rates of decompensation (26% within 90 days) and all-cause mortality (38% at 1 year).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Impact and implications</h3><p>Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924000636/pdfft?md5=18277e3fc7ea9c07efaab4551d7d8704&pid=1-s2.0-S2589555924000636-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Pearson ,&nbsp;Jennifer Nobes ,&nbsp;Iain Macpherson ,&nbsp;Lucy Gold ,&nbsp;Michael Miller ,&nbsp;Ellie Dow ,&nbsp;John F. Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934–2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674–2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% <em>vs.</em> 82.8% at six months). Where FIB-4 was indeterminate, ELF had higher AUC for all outcomes within at least 2 years. ELF ≥13 was associated with particularly high rates of decompensation (26% within 90 days) and all-cause mortality (38% at 1 year).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Impact and implications</h3><p>Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHEP Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924000636/pdfft?md5=18277e3fc7ea9c07efaab4551d7d8704&pid=1-s2.0-S2589555924000636-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHEP Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924000636\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924000636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景& 目的在社区肝病检测路径中,最常见的转诊原因是纤维化评估。我们研究了将增强肝纤维化(ELF)评分作为二线检验(在纤维化-4指数[FIB-4]和/或非酒精性脂肪肝纤维化评分不确定或偏高之后)的影响,以指导我们的多病因路径中的转诊和预后。结果共纳入 1327 名患者,中位随访 859 天,ELF 评分中位数为 10.2。在9.8分的临界值下,肝硬化的总体灵敏度为94%(代谢相关性脂肪性肝病为100%,酒精相关性肝病为89%)。作为二线检测,ELF评分的确定将转诊率降低了34%。ELF评分可预测肝脏结果;每变化一个单位,失代偿率(调整后危险比[aHR] 2.215,95% CI:1.934-2.537)和肝脏相关死亡率(aHR 2.024,95% CI:1.674-2.446)都会增加。就肝脏相关死亡风险而言,ELF优于FIB-4,尤其是在短期内(曲线下面积[AUC]94.3%对6个月时的82.8%)。在FIB-4无法确定的情况下,ELF在至少两年内的所有结果中都具有更高的AUC。ELF≥13与较高的失代偿率(90天内26%)和全因死亡率(1年内38%)相关。ELF评分≥13分的患者被认为是高风险患者,需要进行紧急临床评估。影响和意义疑似肝病的初级护理路径越来越普遍,往往导致肝纤维化评估的专科转诊增加。本研究通过对肝脏相关结果的临床随访,提供了进一步的证据支持ELF检测与其他简单的纤维化标志物相结合,通过两步法安全地减少转诊。此外,ELF评分可预测与肝脏相关的发病率和死亡率,ELF评分≥13分的患者风险特别高。这项研究可能有助于为早期检测肝病的诊断路径的实施提供信息,并强调了对ELF评分非常高的患者进行紧急复查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality

Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score predicts hepatic decompensation and mortality

Background & Aims

In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway.

Methods

Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death).

Results

In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934–2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674–2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% vs. 82.8% at six months). Where FIB-4 was indeterminate, ELF had higher AUC for all outcomes within at least 2 years. ELF ≥13 was associated with particularly high rates of decompensation (26% within 90 days) and all-cause mortality (38% at 1 year).

Conclusions

The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment.

Impact and implications

Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JHEP Reports
JHEP Reports GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
161
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology. The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies. In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信