Luis Lassaletta , Miryam Calvino , Miguel Díaz , José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado , Isabel Varela-Nieto , Javier Gavilán
{"title":"各种前庭裂孔瘤情况下的耳蜗神经功能术中评估:经验教训","authors":"Luis Lassaletta , Miryam Calvino , Miguel Díaz , José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado , Isabel Varela-Nieto , Javier Gavilán","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition.</p><p>Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation.</p><p>Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case.</p><p>The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"446 ","pages":"Article 108997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned\",\"authors\":\"Luis Lassaletta , Miryam Calvino , Miguel Díaz , José Manuel Morales-Puebla , Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado , Isabel Varela-Nieto , Javier Gavilán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition.</p><p>Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation.</p><p>Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case.</p><p>The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"446 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前庭神经分裂瘤(VS)患者使用人工耳蜗(CI)的人数不断增加。除了在肿瘤切除术后植入人工耳蜗外,在观察到的肿瘤和/或照射过的肿瘤中植入人工耳蜗等新情况也越来越常见。一个重要的新趋势是需要在术中评估耳蜗神经的功能,以决定是否植入 CI。本文旨在探讨一家三级中心在 VS 患者的各种情况下应用听觉神经测试系统 (ANTS) 的经验。本文分析了 2021 年至 2023 年期间在一家三级中心接受听觉神经测试系统评估的单侧或双侧 VS(NF2)患者,这些患者在考虑植入 CI 之前都接受了听觉神经测试系统的评估。选择出现稳健的V波作为听性脑干电反应(EABR)阳性的定义。在进行 ANTS 评估之前,两名患者接受了原位刺激 (PromStim) EABR。7例患者中,2例为NF-2患者,5例为散发性VS患者。3例患者的初始方案是同时进行迷宫(TL)肿瘤切除术和CI,4例患者计划在不切除肿瘤的情况下植入CI。ANTS 阳性 4 例,阴性 2 例,不确定 1 例。2 名患者同时接受了鼓室穿刺术和 CI,1 名患者同时接受了鼓室穿刺术和听性脑干植入术,3 名患者接受了鼓室后切术和 CI,1 名患者未植入任何植入物。在 5 名接受 CI 的患者中,均存在声音检测。PromStim 和 ANTS EABR 之间存在良好的相关性。通过文献研究,35 名患者获得了完整的 EABR 反应信息。其中有一个假阴性和一个假阳性病例;也就是说,在肿瘤切除术后出现 V 波的 28 个植入病例中,除一个病例外,其他病例都有一定程度的听觉感知。阳性结果强烈预示 CI 至少能检测到声音。
Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve functionality in various vestibular schwannoma scenarios: Lessons learned
The use of cochlear implants (CIs) is on the rise for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Besides CI following tumor resection, new scenarios such as implantation in observed and/or irradiated tumors are becoming increasingly common. A significant emerging trend is the need of intraoperative evaluation of the functionality of the cochlear nerve in order to decide if a CI would be placed. The purpose of this paper is to explore the experience of a tertiary center with the application of the Auditory Nerve Test System (ANTS) in various scenarios regarding VS patients. The results are compared to that of the studies that have previously used the ANTS in this condition.
Patients with unilateral or bilateral VS (NF2) who were evaluated with the ANTS prior to considering CI in a tertiary center between 2021 and 2023 were analyzed. The presence of a robust wave V was chosen to define a positive electrical auditory brainstem response (EABR). Two patients underwent promontory stimulation (PromStim) EABR previous to ANTS evaluation.
Seven patients, 2 NF-2 and 5 with sporadic VS were included. The initial scenario was simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) tumor resection and CI in 3 cases while a CI placement without tumor resection was planned in 4 cases. The ANTS was positive in 4 cases, negative in 2 cases, and uncertain in one case. Two patients underwent simultaneous TL and CI, 1 patient simultaneous TL and auditory brainstem implant, 3 patients posterior tympanotomy with CI, and 1 patient had no implant placement. In the 5 patients undergoing CI, sound detection was present. There was a good correlation between the PromStim and ANTS EABR. The literature research yielded 35 patients with complete information about EABR response. There was one false negative and one false positive case; that is, the 28 implanted cases with a present wave V following tumor resection had some degree of auditory perception in all but one case.
The ANTS is a useful intraoperative tool to asses CI candidacy in VS patients undergoing observation, irradiation or surgery. A positive strongly predicts at least sound detection with the CI.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.