压电超声手术与传统技术在同时植入种植体的上颌窦提升术中的临床比较研究

mohamed gad el hak
{"title":"压电超声手术与传统技术在同时植入种植体的上颌窦提升术中的临床比较研究","authors":"mohamed gad el hak","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2024.209548.1174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Several methods have developed and are currently used for sinus lifting and augmentation. Aim: this study aimed to make a comparison between piezoelectric ultrasound surgery and conventional technique in sinus lifting procedure with simultaneous implant insertion. Materials and Methods: This case series consisted of twenty-four sinus elevations using the buccal lateral approach technique, the patients had defective upper posterior teeth for a long time with pneumatization of the sinus, they had bone height 5-7 mm which was insufficient for routine implant placement. Result: The results were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference, bone density and implant stability are measure with CT for 6 months. Conclusion: While implant survival and bone gained are better with the ultrasound technique, perforations of the maxillary sinus membrane are more frequent in direct sinus lifts performed with the rotary technique (7%) than with ultrasound (1.7%).","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Clinical Study of Using Piezoelectric Ultrasound Surgery Versus Conventional Technique in Sinus Lifting Procedure with Simultaneous Implant Insertion\",\"authors\":\"mohamed gad el hak\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/dsu.2024.209548.1174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Several methods have developed and are currently used for sinus lifting and augmentation. Aim: this study aimed to make a comparison between piezoelectric ultrasound surgery and conventional technique in sinus lifting procedure with simultaneous implant insertion. Materials and Methods: This case series consisted of twenty-four sinus elevations using the buccal lateral approach technique, the patients had defective upper posterior teeth for a long time with pneumatization of the sinus, they had bone height 5-7 mm which was insufficient for routine implant placement. Result: The results were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference, bone density and implant stability are measure with CT for 6 months. Conclusion: While implant survival and bone gained are better with the ultrasound technique, perforations of the maxillary sinus membrane are more frequent in direct sinus lifts performed with the rotary technique (7%) than with ultrasound (1.7%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":11270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.209548.1174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.209548.1174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:目前已有多种方法用于上颌窦提升术和隆鼻术。目的:本研究旨在比较压电超声手术和传统技术在同时植入植入物的鼻窦提升术中的效果。材料和方法:该系列病例包括 24 例采用颊侧入路技术进行的上颌窦提升术,患者的上后牙长期缺损,上颌窦充气,骨高度为 5-7 毫米,不足以进行常规种植体植入。结果结果采用单因素方差分析进行评估。P值小于0.05表示差异显著,骨密度和种植体稳定性通过6个月的CT测量。结论:虽然超声技术的种植体存活率和骨增量更好,但旋转技术(7%)比超声技术(1.7%)更容易造成上颌窦膜穿孔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Clinical Study of Using Piezoelectric Ultrasound Surgery Versus Conventional Technique in Sinus Lifting Procedure with Simultaneous Implant Insertion
Introduction: Several methods have developed and are currently used for sinus lifting and augmentation. Aim: this study aimed to make a comparison between piezoelectric ultrasound surgery and conventional technique in sinus lifting procedure with simultaneous implant insertion. Materials and Methods: This case series consisted of twenty-four sinus elevations using the buccal lateral approach technique, the patients had defective upper posterior teeth for a long time with pneumatization of the sinus, they had bone height 5-7 mm which was insufficient for routine implant placement. Result: The results were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate a significant difference, bone density and implant stability are measure with CT for 6 months. Conclusion: While implant survival and bone gained are better with the ultrasound technique, perforations of the maxillary sinus membrane are more frequent in direct sinus lifts performed with the rotary technique (7%) than with ultrasound (1.7%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信