{"title":"医生面对 AI(人工智能):伦理与责任","authors":"Cécile Manaouil , Sylvain Chamot , Pascal Petit","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2024 186","pages":"Pages 50-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le médecin confronté à l’IA (Intelligence artificielle) : Éthique et responsabilité\",\"authors\":\"Cécile Manaouil , Sylvain Chamot , Pascal Petit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2024 186\",\"pages\":\"Pages 50-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739124000071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Le médecin confronté à l’IA (Intelligence artificielle) : Éthique et responsabilité
Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing at an impressive speed in the field of health. AI paves the way for new practices in diagnostic assistance, preventive medicine, individualized patient follow-up, support in choosing a therapy, assistance in interpreting the results of additional examinations, etc. Far from being a magic bullet, delegating tasks to AI raises many ethical questions relating in particular to the supervision of algorithms, equal access to innovation and the use of patient data. It is still difficult to predict whether AI will remain a “safety net” for the doctor or if it will supplant him. France and Europe have laid down the principle of “human guarantee” in the interpretation of diagnostic and therapeutic results, implying that the machine cannot act alone and enshrining the responsibility of the health professional. This article aims to understand how complex AI is to regulate legally at the risk of neglecting its secrecy, whether at the individual or collective level.
期刊介绍:
The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues