Daneshwari Kalage , Pankaj Gupta , Ajay Gulati , Kakivaya P. Reddy , Kritika Sharma , Ati Thakur , Thakur D. Yadav , Vikas Gupta , Lileswar Kaman , Ritambhra Nada , Harjeet Singh , Santosh Irrinki , Parikshaa Gupta , Chandan K. Das , Usha Dutta , Manavjit Sandhu
{"title":"对比增强 CT 与核磁共振成像可准确诊断壁增厚型胆囊癌","authors":"Daneshwari Kalage , Pankaj Gupta , Ajay Gulati , Kakivaya P. Reddy , Kritika Sharma , Ati Thakur , Thakur D. Yadav , Vikas Gupta , Lileswar Kaman , Ritambhra Nada , Harjeet Singh , Santosh Irrinki , Parikshaa Gupta , Chandan K. Das , Usha Dutta , Manavjit Sandhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (<em>P</em> = 0.006, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (<em>P</em> = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Daneshwari Kalage , Pankaj Gupta , Ajay Gulati , Kakivaya P. Reddy , Kritika Sharma , Ati Thakur , Thakur D. Yadav , Vikas Gupta , Lileswar Kaman , Ritambhra Nada , Harjeet Singh , Santosh Irrinki , Parikshaa Gupta , Chandan K. Das , Usha Dutta , Manavjit Sandhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (<em>P</em> = 0.006, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (<em>P</em> = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324000549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contrast Enhanced CT Versus MRI for Accurate Diagnosis of Wall-thickening Type Gallbladder Cancer
Introduction
Diagnosis of wall-thickening type gallbladder cancer (GBC) is challenging. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly utilized to evaluate gallbladder wall thickening. However, there is a lack of data comparing the performance of CT and MRI for the detection of wall-thickening type GBC.
Aim
We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in diagnosis of wall-thickening type GBC.
Materials and methods
This prospective study comprised consecutive patients suspected of wall-thickening type GBC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathology of the resected gallbladder lesion. Two radiologists independently reviewed the characteristics of gallbladder wall thickening at CT and MRI. The association of CT and MRI findings with histological diagnosis and the interobserver agreement of CT and MRI findings were assessed.
Results
Thirty-three patients (malignancy, 13 and benign, 20) were included. None of the CT findings were significantly associated with GBC. However, at MRI, heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct interface with the liver, and diffusion restriction were significantly associated with malignancy (P = 0.006, <0.001, and 0.005, respectively), and intramural cysts were significantly associated with benign lesions (P = 0.012). For all MRI findings, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (kappa = 0.697–1.000). At CT, the interobserver agreement was substantial to perfect (k = 0.631–1.000).
Conclusion
These findings suggest that MRI may be preferred over CT in patients with suspected wall thickening type GBC. However, larger multicenter studies must confirm our findings.