轻松行走计划对膝关节骨性关节炎预算的影响

Mahima T. Kumara , Rebecca J. Cleveland , Aleksandra M. Kostic , Serena E. Weisner , Kelli D. Allen , Yvonne M. Golightly , Heather Welch , Melissa Dale , Stephen P. Messier , David J. Hunter , Jeffrey N. Katz , Leigh F. Callahan , Elena Losina
{"title":"轻松行走计划对膝关节骨性关节炎预算的影响","authors":"Mahima T. Kumara ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Cleveland ,&nbsp;Aleksandra M. Kostic ,&nbsp;Serena E. Weisner ,&nbsp;Kelli D. Allen ,&nbsp;Yvonne M. Golightly ,&nbsp;Heather Welch ,&nbsp;Melissa Dale ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Messier ,&nbsp;David J. Hunter ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Katz ,&nbsp;Leigh F. Callahan ,&nbsp;Elena Losina","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers’ funding decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10–50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X/pdfft?md5=fcf17763a67bc8c5ac2c88dd2b7749b9&pid=1-s2.0-S266591312400030X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budget impact of the Walk With Ease program for knee osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Mahima T. Kumara ,&nbsp;Rebecca J. Cleveland ,&nbsp;Aleksandra M. Kostic ,&nbsp;Serena E. Weisner ,&nbsp;Kelli D. Allen ,&nbsp;Yvonne M. Golightly ,&nbsp;Heather Welch ,&nbsp;Melissa Dale ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Messier ,&nbsp;David J. Hunter ,&nbsp;Jeffrey N. Katz ,&nbsp;Leigh F. Callahan ,&nbsp;Elena Losina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers’ funding decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10–50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X/pdfft?md5=fcf17763a67bc8c5ac2c88dd2b7749b9&pid=1-s2.0-S266591312400030X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 "轻松行走"(WWE)是一项有效的低成本行走计划。我们估算了在膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者中实施 WWE 对预算的影响,以此衡量支付者的经济承受能力,为他们的资助决策提供参考。我们使用骨关节炎政策(OAPol)模型来估算人均医疗支出。我们估算了一个拥有 75,000 名成员的假定保险计划在两种情况下为 WWE 提供资金的总成本和每名成员每月的成本(PMPM):1)所有年龄在 45 岁以上的膝关节 OA 患者均符合 WWE 条件;2)年龄在 45 岁以上的膝关节 OA 非活动和非充分活动患者符合条件。在敏感性分析中,我们改变了 WWE 的成本和疗效,并考虑了生产成本。结果在活动水平不受限制的情况下,实施 WWE 会在两年内为保险计划带来 1,002,408 美元的额外收益(0.56 美元 PMPM)。如果资格仅限于不活跃和不够活跃的个人,资助 WWE 将在两年内增加 571,931 美元(0.32 美元 PMPM)。在敏感性分析中,当每人成本增加 10 美元到 1000 美元,失败率降低 10%-50%(增强 WWE 收益的可持续性)时,在不限制资格的情况下,两年的预算影响从 242,684 美元到 6,985,674 美元不等;在限制资格的情况下,两年的预算影响从-43,194 美元(节省成本)到 4,484,122 美元不等。在缺乏公认的可负担性阈值的情况下,这些结果有助于比较 WWE 与其他行为干预措施的可负担性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Budget impact of the Walk With Ease program for knee osteoarthritis

Objective

Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers’ funding decisions.

Methods

We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs.

Results

With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10–50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility.

Conclusion

Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信