Luca Papavero , Jana Wilke , Nawar Ali , Kathrin Schawjinski , Annette Holtdirk , Karsten Schoeller
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄症和手术减压会影响患者的睡眠质量和体位。前瞻性横断面队列研究","authors":"Luca Papavero , Jana Wilke , Nawar Ali , Kathrin Schawjinski , Annette Holtdirk , Karsten Schoeller","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is reasonable to assume that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects the cauda nerve roots also at night.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Does microsurgical decompression influence sleep quality and position?</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A study nurse interviewed 140 patients scheduled for LSS decompression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Douleur Neuropathique (DN4), and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Epidemiologic and MRI data were collected along with self-reported rankings of preferred sleep positions (prone, supine, side, and fetal). Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone six and 18 months after discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPS 24, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>132 patients (55% female, mean age 73 years) were evaluated. Preoperatively, 45 (34.1%) patients were classified as good sleepers (GS: PSQI ≤5, range 1–21 (worst)) and 87 (65.9%) as poor sleepers (PS: PSQI ≥6). Decompression surgery reversed the relationship between PS (31.8%) and GS (68.2%, recovered/improved). Protective fetal sleeping position was the most common (≥70%) before and after surgery for both PS and GS. Risk factors for PS included female sex (p = 0.03), obesity (p = 0.03), high NRS back pain score (p = 0.008), and high SSM symptom score (p = 0.004). MRI imaging did not differ between PS and GS.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>LSS had a negative effect on sleep quality, whereas surgical decompression had a positive effect. The protective fetal sleeping position was the preferred position both before and after surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 102785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419/pdfft?md5=eb7bb88cdbabf2d39cecb571529b55e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000419-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar spinal stenosis and surgical decompression affect sleep quality and position in patients. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Luca Papavero , Jana Wilke , Nawar Ali , Kathrin Schawjinski , Annette Holtdirk , Karsten Schoeller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102785\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is reasonable to assume that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects the cauda nerve roots also at night.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Does microsurgical decompression influence sleep quality and position?</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A study nurse interviewed 140 patients scheduled for LSS decompression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Douleur Neuropathique (DN4), and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Epidemiologic and MRI data were collected along with self-reported rankings of preferred sleep positions (prone, supine, side, and fetal). Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone six and 18 months after discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPS 24, with significance set at p < 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>132 patients (55% female, mean age 73 years) were evaluated. Preoperatively, 45 (34.1%) patients were classified as good sleepers (GS: PSQI ≤5, range 1–21 (worst)) and 87 (65.9%) as poor sleepers (PS: PSQI ≥6). Decompression surgery reversed the relationship between PS (31.8%) and GS (68.2%, recovered/improved). Protective fetal sleeping position was the most common (≥70%) before and after surgery for both PS and GS. Risk factors for PS included female sex (p = 0.03), obesity (p = 0.03), high NRS back pain score (p = 0.008), and high SSM symptom score (p = 0.004). MRI imaging did not differ between PS and GS.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>LSS had a negative effect on sleep quality, whereas surgical decompression had a positive effect. The protective fetal sleeping position was the preferred position both before and after surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419/pdfft?md5=eb7bb88cdbabf2d39cecb571529b55e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000419-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lumbar spinal stenosis and surgical decompression affect sleep quality and position in patients. A prospective cross-sectional cohort study
Introduction
It is reasonable to assume that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects the cauda nerve roots also at night.
Research question
Does microsurgical decompression influence sleep quality and position?
Materials and methods
A study nurse interviewed 140 patients scheduled for LSS decompression using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Spinal Stenosis Measure (SSM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Douleur Neuropathique (DN4), and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Epidemiologic and MRI data were collected along with self-reported rankings of preferred sleep positions (prone, supine, side, and fetal). Follow-up interviews were conducted by telephone six and 18 months after discharge. Statistical analysis was performed using SSPS 24, with significance set at p < 0.05.
Results
132 patients (55% female, mean age 73 years) were evaluated. Preoperatively, 45 (34.1%) patients were classified as good sleepers (GS: PSQI ≤5, range 1–21 (worst)) and 87 (65.9%) as poor sleepers (PS: PSQI ≥6). Decompression surgery reversed the relationship between PS (31.8%) and GS (68.2%, recovered/improved). Protective fetal sleeping position was the most common (≥70%) before and after surgery for both PS and GS. Risk factors for PS included female sex (p = 0.03), obesity (p = 0.03), high NRS back pain score (p = 0.008), and high SSM symptom score (p = 0.004). MRI imaging did not differ between PS and GS.
Discussion and conclusion
LSS had a negative effect on sleep quality, whereas surgical decompression had a positive effect. The protective fetal sleeping position was the preferred position both before and after surgery.