计算机化认知控制训练可减少重度抑郁症患者的反刍:随机对照试验

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ulrike Zetsche , Pauline Neumann , Paul-Christian Bürkner , Babette Renneberg , Ernst H.W. Koster , Kristof Hoorelbeke
{"title":"计算机化认知控制训练可减少重度抑郁症患者的反刍:随机对照试验","authors":"Ulrike Zetsche ,&nbsp;Pauline Neumann ,&nbsp;Paul-Christian Bürkner ,&nbsp;Babette Renneberg ,&nbsp;Ernst H.W. Koster ,&nbsp;Kristof Hoorelbeke","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Rumination is a major risk factor for the onset and recurrence of depressive episodes and has been associated with deficits in updating working memory content. This randomized controlled trial examines whether training updating-specific cognitive control processes reduces daily ruminative thoughts in clinically depressed individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-five individuals with a current major depressive episode were randomized to 10 sessions of either cognitive control training (N = 31) or placebo training (N = 34). The frequency and negativity of individuals’ daily ruminative thoughts were assessed for seven days before training, after training, and at a 3-month follow-up using experience sampling methodology. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, depressed mood, and level of disability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cognitive control training led to stronger improvements in the trained task than placebo training. However, cognitive control training did not lead to greater reductions in the frequency or negativity of daily ruminative thoughts than placebo training. There were no training-specific effects on participants' depressive symptoms or level of disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The robustness of the present null-findings, combined with the methodological strengths of the study, suggest that training currently depressed individuals to update emotional content in working memory does not affect the frequency or negativity of their daily ruminative thoughts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104521"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000482/pdfft?md5=3df78569497bc0973079c54a42fb9e9e&pid=1-s2.0-S0005796724000482-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computerized cognitive control training to reduce rumination in major depression: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Ulrike Zetsche ,&nbsp;Pauline Neumann ,&nbsp;Paul-Christian Bürkner ,&nbsp;Babette Renneberg ,&nbsp;Ernst H.W. Koster ,&nbsp;Kristof Hoorelbeke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Rumination is a major risk factor for the onset and recurrence of depressive episodes and has been associated with deficits in updating working memory content. This randomized controlled trial examines whether training updating-specific cognitive control processes reduces daily ruminative thoughts in clinically depressed individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-five individuals with a current major depressive episode were randomized to 10 sessions of either cognitive control training (N = 31) or placebo training (N = 34). The frequency and negativity of individuals’ daily ruminative thoughts were assessed for seven days before training, after training, and at a 3-month follow-up using experience sampling methodology. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, depressed mood, and level of disability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Cognitive control training led to stronger improvements in the trained task than placebo training. However, cognitive control training did not lead to greater reductions in the frequency or negativity of daily ruminative thoughts than placebo training. There were no training-specific effects on participants' depressive symptoms or level of disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The robustness of the present null-findings, combined with the methodological strengths of the study, suggest that training currently depressed individuals to update emotional content in working memory does not affect the frequency or negativity of their daily ruminative thoughts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000482/pdfft?md5=3df78569497bc0973079c54a42fb9e9e&pid=1-s2.0-S0005796724000482-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000482\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724000482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的反刍是抑郁症发作和复发的一个主要风险因素,与工作记忆内容更新方面的缺陷有关。本随机对照试验研究了对临床抑郁症患者进行更新特异性认知控制过程的训练是否能减少他们每天的反刍想法。方法65名目前有严重抑郁发作的患者被随机分配到认知控制训练(31人)或安慰剂训练(34人)中,共10个疗程。在训练前七天、训练后和为期三个月的随访中,采用经验抽样法对患者日常反刍想法的频率和消极性进行评估。次要结果包括抑郁症状、抑郁情绪和残疾程度。然而,与安慰剂训练相比,认知控制训练并没有导致日常反刍想法的频率或消极性有更大的降低。结论本结论的稳健性与研究方法的优势相结合,表明训练当前抑郁症患者更新工作记忆中的情绪内容并不会影响其日常反刍想法的频率或消极性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computerized cognitive control training to reduce rumination in major depression: A randomized controlled trial

Objective

Rumination is a major risk factor for the onset and recurrence of depressive episodes and has been associated with deficits in updating working memory content. This randomized controlled trial examines whether training updating-specific cognitive control processes reduces daily ruminative thoughts in clinically depressed individuals.

Methods

Sixty-five individuals with a current major depressive episode were randomized to 10 sessions of either cognitive control training (N = 31) or placebo training (N = 34). The frequency and negativity of individuals’ daily ruminative thoughts were assessed for seven days before training, after training, and at a 3-month follow-up using experience sampling methodology. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms, depressed mood, and level of disability.

Results

Cognitive control training led to stronger improvements in the trained task than placebo training. However, cognitive control training did not lead to greater reductions in the frequency or negativity of daily ruminative thoughts than placebo training. There were no training-specific effects on participants' depressive symptoms or level of disability.

Conclusions

The robustness of the present null-findings, combined with the methodological strengths of the study, suggest that training currently depressed individuals to update emotional content in working memory does not affect the frequency or negativity of their daily ruminative thoughts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信