外部审查和绿色债券信誉

Elsa Allman , Brandon Lock
{"title":"外部审查和绿色债券信誉","authors":"Elsa Allman ,&nbsp;Brandon Lock","doi":"10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an effort to alleviate greenwashing concerns, firms are increasingly commissioning voluntary external reviews of their green bond issues. This paper examines the certification role of external parties in the corporate green bond market and the effects on green bond pricing at issuance. Using a comprehensive sample of 1242 corporate green bonds issued between 2013 and 2020, we initially find that external reviews have no significant on average effect on the green bond premium (i.e., the difference in yield between a green bond and a similar conventional bond). However, we predict and find that external reviews have a larger impact on the green bond premium (i.e., a 50 basis point premium) for issuers domiciled in common law countries. Funding costs are also lower when issuers obtain external reviews from more reputable reviewers. Overall, our results suggest that the pricing implications of green bond external reviews depend crucially on both the location of the issuer and the reputation of the external reviewer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Climate Finance","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100036"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External reviews and green bond credibility\",\"authors\":\"Elsa Allman ,&nbsp;Brandon Lock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclimf.2024.100036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In an effort to alleviate greenwashing concerns, firms are increasingly commissioning voluntary external reviews of their green bond issues. This paper examines the certification role of external parties in the corporate green bond market and the effects on green bond pricing at issuance. Using a comprehensive sample of 1242 corporate green bonds issued between 2013 and 2020, we initially find that external reviews have no significant on average effect on the green bond premium (i.e., the difference in yield between a green bond and a similar conventional bond). However, we predict and find that external reviews have a larger impact on the green bond premium (i.e., a 50 basis point premium) for issuers domiciled in common law countries. Funding costs are also lower when issuers obtain external reviews from more reputable reviewers. Overall, our results suggest that the pricing implications of green bond external reviews depend crucially on both the location of the issuer and the reputation of the external reviewer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Climate Finance\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100036\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Climate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949728024000063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Climate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949728024000063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了减轻人们对 "绿色冲洗 "的担忧,越来越多的公司委托外部机构对其发行的绿色债券进行自愿审查。本文研究了外部机构在企业绿色债券市场中的认证作用以及对绿色债券发行定价的影响。通过对 2013 年至 2020 年间发行的 1242 只企业绿色债券进行全面抽样调查,我们初步发现,外部审查对绿色债券溢价(即绿色债券与类似传统债券之间的收益率差异)没有显著的平均影响。然而,我们预测并发现,外部审查对英美法系国家发行人的绿色债券溢价有较大影响(即 50 个基点的溢价)。当发行人从声誉更高的审查机构获得外部审查时,融资成本也更低。总之,我们的研究结果表明,绿色债券外部审核对定价的影响主要取决于发行人的所在地和外部审核人的声誉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External reviews and green bond credibility

In an effort to alleviate greenwashing concerns, firms are increasingly commissioning voluntary external reviews of their green bond issues. This paper examines the certification role of external parties in the corporate green bond market and the effects on green bond pricing at issuance. Using a comprehensive sample of 1242 corporate green bonds issued between 2013 and 2020, we initially find that external reviews have no significant on average effect on the green bond premium (i.e., the difference in yield between a green bond and a similar conventional bond). However, we predict and find that external reviews have a larger impact on the green bond premium (i.e., a 50 basis point premium) for issuers domiciled in common law countries. Funding costs are also lower when issuers obtain external reviews from more reputable reviewers. Overall, our results suggest that the pricing implications of green bond external reviews depend crucially on both the location of the issuer and the reputation of the external reviewer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信