Muhammet Ali Heyik , Maria Camila Castellanos-Escobar , José María Romero-Martínez , Zühal Çalışkan
{"title":"探索市民对参与式设计和规划的看法:对三个首都城市的比较研究","authors":"Muhammet Ali Heyik , Maria Camila Castellanos-Escobar , José María Romero-Martínez , Zühal Çalışkan","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Participation is often employed by authorities as a unilateral tool for gathering data from citizens, informing them about processes, and obtaining legitimacy and accountability, rather than truly empowering or collaborating with citizens. However, many scholars emphasize the vital role of civic consciousness and collective intelligence (CI) in addressing chronic issues and global crises related to shared interests and values. To achieve this with effective participatory design and planning (PD&P) processes, it's essential to understand citizens' perspectives rather than imposing ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches.</p><p>We explored how citizens evaluate existing PD&P mechanisms in three capital cities: Ankara, Bogota, and Madrid, representing developed, developing, and least-developed countries. Through collective experiments using conjoint analysis, we conducted citizen interviews based on the CI genome consisting of key dimensions and attributes of PD&P for public spaces. Crowdsourcing applications were integrated to enhance field studies. Additionally, chord diagrams and scatter charts visually depict interrelations among the grouped and ranked genome attributes. Our analysis explores variations and commonalities across cities and includes reflections from students.</p><p>The results show that PD&P is perceived as significantly important, while top-down political decisions are perceived as dissatisfactory by most respondents. Notably, Madrid stands out positively in certain dimensions, including the willingness for active participation, multi-functionality as a capital, and diversity of initiatives. In addition, the political culture, respondents' education, age, and attachment to the city have significant influences on preferred methods, prioritized issues, and attitudes. Despite its limitations, conjoint analysis holds promise as a method to understand citizens' demands and design robust PD&P settings for deeper and broader involvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000093/pdfft?md5=ed8c1d25f1ffe75ed310cd2ca31cb19c&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328624000093-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring citizens' perspectives on participatory design and planning: A comparative study across three capital cities\",\"authors\":\"Muhammet Ali Heyik , Maria Camila Castellanos-Escobar , José María Romero-Martínez , Zühal Çalışkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ugj.2024.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Participation is often employed by authorities as a unilateral tool for gathering data from citizens, informing them about processes, and obtaining legitimacy and accountability, rather than truly empowering or collaborating with citizens. However, many scholars emphasize the vital role of civic consciousness and collective intelligence (CI) in addressing chronic issues and global crises related to shared interests and values. To achieve this with effective participatory design and planning (PD&P) processes, it's essential to understand citizens' perspectives rather than imposing ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches.</p><p>We explored how citizens evaluate existing PD&P mechanisms in three capital cities: Ankara, Bogota, and Madrid, representing developed, developing, and least-developed countries. Through collective experiments using conjoint analysis, we conducted citizen interviews based on the CI genome consisting of key dimensions and attributes of PD&P for public spaces. Crowdsourcing applications were integrated to enhance field studies. Additionally, chord diagrams and scatter charts visually depict interrelations among the grouped and ranked genome attributes. Our analysis explores variations and commonalities across cities and includes reflections from students.</p><p>The results show that PD&P is perceived as significantly important, while top-down political decisions are perceived as dissatisfactory by most respondents. Notably, Madrid stands out positively in certain dimensions, including the willingness for active participation, multi-functionality as a capital, and diversity of initiatives. In addition, the political culture, respondents' education, age, and attachment to the city have significant influences on preferred methods, prioritized issues, and attitudes. Despite its limitations, conjoint analysis holds promise as a method to understand citizens' demands and design robust PD&P settings for deeper and broader involvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Governance\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 101-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000093/pdfft?md5=ed8c1d25f1ffe75ed310cd2ca31cb19c&pid=1-s2.0-S2664328624000093-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2664328624000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当局往往把参与作为一种单方面的工具,用来收集公民的数据、向他们通报有关进程以及获得合法性和问责制,而不是真正赋予公民权力或与公民合作。然而,许多学者强调公民意识和集体智慧(CI)在解决与共同利益和价值观相关的长期问题和全球危机中的重要作用。为了通过有效的参与式设计和规划(PD&P)过程实现这一目标,必须了解市民的观点,而不是强加 "一刀切 "的方法:我们在三个首都城市:安卡拉、波哥大和马德里,分别代表发达国家、发展中国家和最不发达国家,探讨了市民如何评价现有的 PD&P 机制。通过使用联合分析法进行集体实验,我们根据由公共空间开发和维护的关键维度和属性组成的 CI 基因组开展了市民访谈。我们整合了众包应用程序,以加强实地研究。此外,和弦图和散点图直观地描述了分组和排序基因组属性之间的相互关系。我们的分析探讨了不同城市之间的差异和共性,并包含了学生们的反思。结果显示,大多数受访者认为 PD&P 非常重要,而自上而下的政治决策则令人不满。值得注意的是,马德里在某些方面表现突出,包括积极参与的意愿、作为首都的多功能性以及倡议的多样性。此外,政治文化、受访者的教育程度、年龄和对城市的依恋程度对首选方法、优先考虑的问题和态度也有重大影响。尽管存在局限性,但联合分析作为一种了解市民需求、设计健全的公共发展和伙伴关系环境以促进更深入、更广泛的参与的方法,还是大有可为的。
Exploring citizens' perspectives on participatory design and planning: A comparative study across three capital cities
Participation is often employed by authorities as a unilateral tool for gathering data from citizens, informing them about processes, and obtaining legitimacy and accountability, rather than truly empowering or collaborating with citizens. However, many scholars emphasize the vital role of civic consciousness and collective intelligence (CI) in addressing chronic issues and global crises related to shared interests and values. To achieve this with effective participatory design and planning (PD&P) processes, it's essential to understand citizens' perspectives rather than imposing ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches.
We explored how citizens evaluate existing PD&P mechanisms in three capital cities: Ankara, Bogota, and Madrid, representing developed, developing, and least-developed countries. Through collective experiments using conjoint analysis, we conducted citizen interviews based on the CI genome consisting of key dimensions and attributes of PD&P for public spaces. Crowdsourcing applications were integrated to enhance field studies. Additionally, chord diagrams and scatter charts visually depict interrelations among the grouped and ranked genome attributes. Our analysis explores variations and commonalities across cities and includes reflections from students.
The results show that PD&P is perceived as significantly important, while top-down political decisions are perceived as dissatisfactory by most respondents. Notably, Madrid stands out positively in certain dimensions, including the willingness for active participation, multi-functionality as a capital, and diversity of initiatives. In addition, the political culture, respondents' education, age, and attachment to the city have significant influences on preferred methods, prioritized issues, and attitudes. Despite its limitations, conjoint analysis holds promise as a method to understand citizens' demands and design robust PD&P settings for deeper and broader involvement.