下第三磨牙撞击手术拔牙,新难度等级评估

Aya Mohammed, Mohammed Eid, Tamer Hamed
{"title":"下第三磨牙撞击手术拔牙,新难度等级评估","authors":"Aya Mohammed, Mohammed Eid, Tamer Hamed","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Assessment of the surgical complexity of lower third molar extraction is a crucial step to formulate an optimal treatment plan, balancing the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical extraction procedure to manage intraoperative complications and postoperative pain. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new scale of surgical difficulty for the extraction of the impacted lower third molar . Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients were attended for lower third molar extraction . All patients undergoing the same surgical approach including anesthesia, incision, and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap, ostectomy, and tooth sectioning, elevation, and avulsion according to the root axis, socket debridement, and suturing. The period of this study extended for 2 years. Results: The mesio angular impaction was the most common type of impaction, followed by horizontal impaction. There was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessment of a simple operation. 26 third molars (48.15%) were considered preoperatively medium difficulty group, and 80.77% was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessments of moderately simple (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our scale is effective since the mandibular third molars with the highest scores were significantly correlated to longer ostectomy time and total surgical time.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty\",\"authors\":\"Aya Mohammed, Mohammed Eid, Tamer Hamed\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Assessment of the surgical complexity of lower third molar extraction is a crucial step to formulate an optimal treatment plan, balancing the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical extraction procedure to manage intraoperative complications and postoperative pain. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new scale of surgical difficulty for the extraction of the impacted lower third molar . Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients were attended for lower third molar extraction . All patients undergoing the same surgical approach including anesthesia, incision, and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap, ostectomy, and tooth sectioning, elevation, and avulsion according to the root axis, socket debridement, and suturing. The period of this study extended for 2 years. Results: The mesio angular impaction was the most common type of impaction, followed by horizontal impaction. There was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessment of a simple operation. 26 third molars (48.15%) were considered preoperatively medium difficulty group, and 80.77% was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessments of moderately simple (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our scale is effective since the mandibular third molars with the highest scores were significantly correlated to longer ostectomy time and total surgical time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.188601.1158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:评估下第三磨牙拔除术的手术复杂程度是制定最佳治疗方案的关键步骤,要平衡拔牙手术的优缺点,控制术中并发症和术后疼痛。目的:本研究旨在评估下第三磨牙阻生拔除手术难度新量表的准确性。患者和方法54 名患者接受了下第三磨牙拔除术。所有患者都接受了相同的手术方法,包括麻醉、切口和粘骨膜瓣的抬高、骨膜切除术、牙齿切片、抬高、根据牙根轴线撕脱、牙槽清创和缝合。该研究为期两年。研究结果中角阻生是最常见的阻生类型,其次是水平阻生。术前和术后对简单手术的评估结果一致。26颗第三磨牙(48.15%)术前被认为是中等难度组,80.77%的第三磨牙术前和术后评估结果一致(P<0.001)。结论:我们的量表是有效的,因为得分最高的下颌第三磨牙与较长的矫治时间和总手术时间显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical Extraction of Impacted Lower Third Molar, Evaluation of a New Scale of Difficulty
Introduction: Assessment of the surgical complexity of lower third molar extraction is a crucial step to formulate an optimal treatment plan, balancing the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical extraction procedure to manage intraoperative complications and postoperative pain. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a new scale of surgical difficulty for the extraction of the impacted lower third molar . Patients and methods: Fifty-four patients were attended for lower third molar extraction . All patients undergoing the same surgical approach including anesthesia, incision, and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap, ostectomy, and tooth sectioning, elevation, and avulsion according to the root axis, socket debridement, and suturing. The period of this study extended for 2 years. Results: The mesio angular impaction was the most common type of impaction, followed by horizontal impaction. There was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessment of a simple operation. 26 third molars (48.15%) were considered preoperatively medium difficulty group, and 80.77% was agreement between the preoperative and the postoperative assessments of moderately simple (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our scale is effective since the mandibular third molars with the highest scores were significantly correlated to longer ostectomy time and total surgical time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信