Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi (REVIEWERS), Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Afaf Noman Aboalrejal
{"title":"审查分析和评估 - 治疗/诊断","authors":"Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi (REVIEWERS), Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Afaf Noman Aboalrejal","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Article Title and Bibliographic Information</h3><p>Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023).</p></div><div><h3>Source of Funding</h3><p>Not reported.</p></div><div><h3>Type of Study/Design</h3><p>Systematic review with network meta-analysis of data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 101987"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIGITAL SCANS, COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS, MAY EXPEDITE FABRICATION TIME FOR FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES WHILE MAINTAINING A COMPARABLE LEVEL OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi (REVIEWERS), Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Afaf Noman Aboalrejal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101987\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Article Title and Bibliographic Information</h3><p>Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023).</p></div><div><h3>Source of Funding</h3><p>Not reported.</p></div><div><h3>Type of Study/Design</h3><p>Systematic review with network meta-analysis of data.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 101987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338224000289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338224000289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
文章标题和参考文献信息对于种植体支持的固定全牙弓修复体,数字扫描与传统印模的临床效果对比:系统回顾和荟萃分析。I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023).经费来源未报道.研究/设计类型系统综述与网络数据荟萃分析。
DIGITAL SCANS, COMPARED TO CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS, MAY EXPEDITE FABRICATION TIME FOR FULL-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES WHILE MAINTAINING A COMPARABLE LEVEL OF MARGINAL BONE LOSS
Article Title and Bibliographic Information
Clinical outcomes of digital scans versus conventional impressions for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. I. A., Spin-Neto, R., Sesma, N., & da Silva, E. V. F. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023).
Source of Funding
Not reported.
Type of Study/Design
Systematic review with network meta-analysis of data.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.