{"title":"无皮瓣激光皮质切除术辅助的上下犬牵引率比较","authors":"Abubakr R Bakr, Mohamed Nadim, A. ElKadi","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2024.203434.1166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: One of the most frequent issues in extraction cases is the prolonged duration of orthodontic therapy and the slow rate of canine retraction. Aim: This secondary analysis study aimed to compare the rate of canine retraction in upper and lower canines facilitated with Flapless Laser corticotomy (FLC). Materials and Methods : The study included 56 canines from 14 patients (2 males /12 females) with a mean age of (20.4±2.5) years diagnosed with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and treated with 4 premolars extraction with upper and lower fixed appliances. The intervention was applied in a split-mouth fashion, so before commencing the study, 2 random computer-generated lists with a 1:1 allocation ratio were obtained to detect the side of intervention, these lists were concealed in opaque envelopes until the time of intervention. All participants were allocated into 2 groups, I-(Maxillary canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control, B. FLC) and II-(Mandibular canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control B. FLC). FLC was applied on the experimental sides before canine retraction by performing 6 holes with 3 mm of depth into the alveolar bone on both mesial and distal sides of all canines, then canines’ retraction was performed using closed-coil springs to obtain a force of 150 gm while anchorage was augmented indirectly with TADs. The rate of canine retraction was assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 (just before, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after retraction), using 3-Dimentional digital casts. Only the statistical analysis expert was blinded. Results: The results showed a statistically non-significant difference between all groups (upper and lower flapless laser corticotomy and control) in the change in canine retraction distance and monthly rate of Canine retraction. Conclusion: There were neither statistically nor clinically significant differences between upper and lower canine retraction rates either by conventional method or assisted by FLC performed in this study.","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"2 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Upper and Lower Canine Retraction Rates Assisted by Flapless Laser Corticotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Abubakr R Bakr, Mohamed Nadim, A. ElKadi\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/dsu.2024.203434.1166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: One of the most frequent issues in extraction cases is the prolonged duration of orthodontic therapy and the slow rate of canine retraction. Aim: This secondary analysis study aimed to compare the rate of canine retraction in upper and lower canines facilitated with Flapless Laser corticotomy (FLC). Materials and Methods : The study included 56 canines from 14 patients (2 males /12 females) with a mean age of (20.4±2.5) years diagnosed with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and treated with 4 premolars extraction with upper and lower fixed appliances. The intervention was applied in a split-mouth fashion, so before commencing the study, 2 random computer-generated lists with a 1:1 allocation ratio were obtained to detect the side of intervention, these lists were concealed in opaque envelopes until the time of intervention. All participants were allocated into 2 groups, I-(Maxillary canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control, B. FLC) and II-(Mandibular canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control B. FLC). FLC was applied on the experimental sides before canine retraction by performing 6 holes with 3 mm of depth into the alveolar bone on both mesial and distal sides of all canines, then canines’ retraction was performed using closed-coil springs to obtain a force of 150 gm while anchorage was augmented indirectly with TADs. The rate of canine retraction was assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 (just before, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after retraction), using 3-Dimentional digital casts. Only the statistical analysis expert was blinded. Results: The results showed a statistically non-significant difference between all groups (upper and lower flapless laser corticotomy and control) in the change in canine retraction distance and monthly rate of Canine retraction. Conclusion: There were neither statistically nor clinically significant differences between upper and lower canine retraction rates either by conventional method or assisted by FLC performed in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental Science Updates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.203434.1166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2024.203434.1166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介拔牙病例中最常见的问题之一是正畸治疗时间过长和犬齿回缩速度过慢。目的:这项二次分析研究旨在比较无瓣激光皮质切除术(FLC)促进上下犬齿回缩的速度。材料和方法:研究对象包括 14 名患者(2 男/12 女)的 56 颗犬牙,这些患者被诊断为双颌牙槽前突,平均年龄为(20.4±2.5)岁,接受过 4 颗前臼齿拔除和上下固定矫治器治疗。干预以分口方式进行,因此在研究开始前,先通过计算机随机生成 2 份分配比例为 1:1 的名单,以检测干预的一侧,这些名单被隐藏在不透明的信封中,直到干预开始。所有参与者被分为两组,I 组(上颌犬齿:分为 A. 对照组和 B. FLC 组)和 II 组(下颌犬齿:分为 A. 对照组和 B. FLC 组)。在牵引犬齿之前,在所有犬齿的中侧和远侧的牙槽骨上打 6 个深度为 3 mm 的孔,在实验侧应用 FLC,然后使用闭合卷簧牵引犬齿,以获得 150 gm 的力,同时使用 TAD 间接增强锚定。在 T0、T1、T2 和 T3(拔牙前、拔牙后 1 个月、拔牙后 2 个月和拔牙后 3 个月)时,使用三维数字铸模评估犬齿的回缩率。只有统计分析专家是盲人。结果结果显示,所有组别(上下无瓣激光皮质切除术组和对照组)在犬牵引距离变化和每月犬牵引率方面的差异均无统计学意义。结论在本研究中,无论是采用传统方法还是采用无皮瓣激光皮质切除术辅助,上下犬齿牵引率在统计学和临床上都没有显著差异。
Comparison of Upper and Lower Canine Retraction Rates Assisted by Flapless Laser Corticotomy.
Introduction: One of the most frequent issues in extraction cases is the prolonged duration of orthodontic therapy and the slow rate of canine retraction. Aim: This secondary analysis study aimed to compare the rate of canine retraction in upper and lower canines facilitated with Flapless Laser corticotomy (FLC). Materials and Methods : The study included 56 canines from 14 patients (2 males /12 females) with a mean age of (20.4±2.5) years diagnosed with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and treated with 4 premolars extraction with upper and lower fixed appliances. The intervention was applied in a split-mouth fashion, so before commencing the study, 2 random computer-generated lists with a 1:1 allocation ratio were obtained to detect the side of intervention, these lists were concealed in opaque envelopes until the time of intervention. All participants were allocated into 2 groups, I-(Maxillary canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control, B. FLC) and II-(Mandibular canines: which were divided into two subgroups A. Control B. FLC). FLC was applied on the experimental sides before canine retraction by performing 6 holes with 3 mm of depth into the alveolar bone on both mesial and distal sides of all canines, then canines’ retraction was performed using closed-coil springs to obtain a force of 150 gm while anchorage was augmented indirectly with TADs. The rate of canine retraction was assessed at T0, T1, T2, and T3 (just before, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after retraction), using 3-Dimentional digital casts. Only the statistical analysis expert was blinded. Results: The results showed a statistically non-significant difference between all groups (upper and lower flapless laser corticotomy and control) in the change in canine retraction distance and monthly rate of Canine retraction. Conclusion: There were neither statistically nor clinically significant differences between upper and lower canine retraction rates either by conventional method or assisted by FLC performed in this study.