评估姜黄素和熊果酸脂质强化胶囊组合的安全性、生物利用率和肠道微生物组的 1 期临床试验

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
{"title":"评估姜黄素和熊果酸脂质强化胶囊组合的安全性、生物利用率和肠道微生物组的 1 期临床试验","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As screening strategies employ better biomarkers and genetics to identify individuals at an increased risk of prostate cancer, there are currently no chemotherapeutic prevention strategies. With any chemoprevention strategy, the population will be younger and healthier; therefore, they will be less tolerant of side effects. This study translated findings from screening a natural product library and pre-clinical evaluation of curcumin (CURC) in combination with ursolic acid (UA) in prostate cancer models. After manufacturing capsules for each compound, 18 subjects were enrolled. The study used a 3 × 3 phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate CURC (1200 mg/day) and UA (300 mg/day) alone and in combination over a 2-week period with endpoints of safety, bioavailability, and microbiome alterations. After enrolling six subjects in each arm, we found no grade 3 or 4 events and only minor changes in the safety laboratory values. In the pooled analysis of groups, we noted a statistically significant difference between median serum levels of UA when administered alone vs administered in the combination (2.7 ng/mL vs 43.8 ng/mL, p = 0.03). Individuals receiving the combination also had a favorable impact on gut microbiome status and a reduction in “microbiome score” predictive of prostate cancer risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S222541102400021X/pdfft?md5=d678b810e7bfbd0337e3fd51f0011836&pid=1-s2.0-S222541102400021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating safety, bioavailability, and gut microbiome with a combination of curcumin and ursolic acid in lipid enhanced capsules\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtcme.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As screening strategies employ better biomarkers and genetics to identify individuals at an increased risk of prostate cancer, there are currently no chemotherapeutic prevention strategies. With any chemoprevention strategy, the population will be younger and healthier; therefore, they will be less tolerant of side effects. This study translated findings from screening a natural product library and pre-clinical evaluation of curcumin (CURC) in combination with ursolic acid (UA) in prostate cancer models. After manufacturing capsules for each compound, 18 subjects were enrolled. The study used a 3 × 3 phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate CURC (1200 mg/day) and UA (300 mg/day) alone and in combination over a 2-week period with endpoints of safety, bioavailability, and microbiome alterations. After enrolling six subjects in each arm, we found no grade 3 or 4 events and only minor changes in the safety laboratory values. In the pooled analysis of groups, we noted a statistically significant difference between median serum levels of UA when administered alone vs administered in the combination (2.7 ng/mL vs 43.8 ng/mL, p = 0.03). Individuals receiving the combination also had a favorable impact on gut microbiome status and a reduction in “microbiome score” predictive of prostate cancer risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S222541102400021X/pdfft?md5=d678b810e7bfbd0337e3fd51f0011836&pid=1-s2.0-S222541102400021X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S222541102400021X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S222541102400021X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于筛查策略采用了更好的生物标志物和遗传学方法来确定前列腺癌的高危人群,目前还没有化疗预防策略。任何化学预防策略的适用人群都将更年轻、更健康;因此,他们对副作用的耐受性将更低。本研究将筛选天然产品库和姜黄素(CURC)与熊果酸(UA)联合用于前列腺癌模型的临床前评估结果进行了转化。在为每种化合物生产胶囊后,共招募了 18 名受试者。该研究采用 3 × 3 的 1 期临床试验,对 CURC(1200 毫克/天)和 UA(300 毫克/天)在 2 周时间内单独或联合使用进行评估,终点是安全性、生物利用度和微生物组改变。在每组招募 6 名受试者后,我们未发现 3 级或 4 级事件,安全性实验室值也仅有轻微变化。在各组的汇总分析中,我们注意到单独用药与联合用药的 UA 血清中位数水平之间存在显著的统计学差异(2.7 纳克/毫升 vs 43.8 纳克/毫升,p = 0.03)。接受联合用药的个体还对肠道微生物组状态产生了有利影响,并降低了预测前列腺癌风险的 "微生物组评分"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating safety, bioavailability, and gut microbiome with a combination of curcumin and ursolic acid in lipid enhanced capsules

Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating safety, bioavailability, and gut microbiome with a combination of curcumin and ursolic acid in lipid enhanced capsules

As screening strategies employ better biomarkers and genetics to identify individuals at an increased risk of prostate cancer, there are currently no chemotherapeutic prevention strategies. With any chemoprevention strategy, the population will be younger and healthier; therefore, they will be less tolerant of side effects. This study translated findings from screening a natural product library and pre-clinical evaluation of curcumin (CURC) in combination with ursolic acid (UA) in prostate cancer models. After manufacturing capsules for each compound, 18 subjects were enrolled. The study used a 3 × 3 phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate CURC (1200 mg/day) and UA (300 mg/day) alone and in combination over a 2-week period with endpoints of safety, bioavailability, and microbiome alterations. After enrolling six subjects in each arm, we found no grade 3 or 4 events and only minor changes in the safety laboratory values. In the pooled analysis of groups, we noted a statistically significant difference between median serum levels of UA when administered alone vs administered in the combination (2.7 ng/mL vs 43.8 ng/mL, p = 0.03). Individuals receiving the combination also had a favorable impact on gut microbiome status and a reduction in “microbiome score” predictive of prostate cancer risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine
Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信