阿尔泰国立大学,俄罗斯巴尔瑙尔

Светлана Осокина, Кристина Ушакова
{"title":"阿尔泰国立大学,俄罗斯巴尔瑙尔","authors":"Светлана Осокина, Кристина Ушакова","doi":"10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-34-48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific article deals with the problem of determining the linguistic essence of evaluation. The main approach to identifying evaluative components of meaning at the moment is the semantic analysis of linguistic expressions. But with the development of online communication, the analysis of context has become relevant, since the pragmatic evaluative meaning is manifested indirectly, going beyond the semantic structure of the expression. This is especially important for the study of texts within the framework of linguistic expertise, where one of the most frequent objects is an Internet commentary. In this study, 827 publications containing evaluation were analyzed. The article points out predominantly lexical, predominantly syntactic, mixed, graphic means of expressing evaluation, and emphasizes the means of expressing evaluative meaning typical for Internet comments: case, punctuation marks, symbols, emoticons. The range of these means requires additional study due to the dynamism of their development and the breadth of their use","PeriodicalId":395710,"journal":{"name":"LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE: THEORY AND PRACTICE","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия\",\"authors\":\"Светлана Осокина, Кристина Ушакова\",\"doi\":\"10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-34-48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This scientific article deals with the problem of determining the linguistic essence of evaluation. The main approach to identifying evaluative components of meaning at the moment is the semantic analysis of linguistic expressions. But with the development of online communication, the analysis of context has become relevant, since the pragmatic evaluative meaning is manifested indirectly, going beyond the semantic structure of the expression. This is especially important for the study of texts within the framework of linguistic expertise, where one of the most frequent objects is an Internet commentary. In this study, 827 publications containing evaluation were analyzed. The article points out predominantly lexical, predominantly syntactic, mixed, graphic means of expressing evaluation, and emphasizes the means of expressing evaluative meaning typical for Internet comments: case, punctuation marks, symbols, emoticons. The range of these means requires additional study due to the dynamism of their development and the breadth of their use\",\"PeriodicalId\":395710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE: THEORY AND PRACTICE\",\"volume\":\"14 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE: THEORY AND PRACTICE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-34-48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE: THEORY AND PRACTICE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52301/2957-5567-2024-1-34-48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇科学文章探讨了确定评价的语言本质问题。目前,确定评价意义成分的主要方法是对语言表达进行语义分析。但是,随着在线交流的发展,语境分析变得非常重要,因为语用评价意义是间接表现出来的,超越了表达的语义结构。这对于语言专业知识框架内的文本研究尤为重要,而最常见的研究对象之一就是网络评论。本研究分析了 827 篇包含评价的出版物。文章指出了表达评价的主要词法手段、主要句法手段、混合手段、图形手段,并强调了网络评论中典型的表达评价意义的手段:大小写、标点符号、符号、表情符号。由于其发展的动态性和使用的广泛性,这些手段的范围还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Алтайский государственный университет, Барнаул, Россия
This scientific article deals with the problem of determining the linguistic essence of evaluation. The main approach to identifying evaluative components of meaning at the moment is the semantic analysis of linguistic expressions. But with the development of online communication, the analysis of context has become relevant, since the pragmatic evaluative meaning is manifested indirectly, going beyond the semantic structure of the expression. This is especially important for the study of texts within the framework of linguistic expertise, where one of the most frequent objects is an Internet commentary. In this study, 827 publications containing evaluation were analyzed. The article points out predominantly lexical, predominantly syntactic, mixed, graphic means of expressing evaluation, and emphasizes the means of expressing evaluative meaning typical for Internet comments: case, punctuation marks, symbols, emoticons. The range of these means requires additional study due to the dynamism of their development and the breadth of their use
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信