用于报告甲状腺细胞病理学的贝塞斯达系统和基于超声波的 Tirads 之间的相关性

Ayesha Safdar, Raazia Mehmood, Maria Khan, Faryal Javaid, Ayesha Sajjad, Maria Tasneem Khattak, Iqbal Muhammad Khan
{"title":"用于报告甲状腺细胞病理学的贝塞斯达系统和基于超声波的 Tirads 之间的相关性","authors":"Ayesha Safdar, Raazia Mehmood, Maria Khan, Faryal Javaid, Ayesha Sajjad, Maria Tasneem Khattak, Iqbal Muhammad Khan","doi":"10.52764/jms.24.32.1.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To correlate the screening ability of ultrasound-based TIRADS with the FNAC-based Bethesda system when the latter is kept as a gold standard.\nMaterial and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Histopathology department, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 15th June 2022- 14th June 2023. A total of 363 patients from any age group of either gender diagnosed with thyroid nodules were included in the trial. All the participants underwent ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. TIRADS and Bethesda grading was done for each participant. Demographics and grading scores were recorded. Keeping Bethesda scoring as gold standard diagnostic performance of TIRADS grading was calculated.\nResults: Mean age of the patients was 46.68 ± 12.28 years with a female-to-male ratio of 2.3:1.  TIRADS grading revealed 210 (69.8%) from TIRADS 2 while 70(82.4%), 12(50%), and 09(23.7%) patients were from TIRADS 3, 4 and 5 categories respectively. Bethesda grades were 301(82.9%), 21(5.8%), 09(2.5%), 28(7.7%), and 04(1.1%) from Bethesda 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories respectively. The sensitivity of the TIRADS was 93.8%, specificity 89.1%, positive predictive value 45%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 89.5%.\nConclusion: TIRADS grading has a high diagnostic ability when Bethesda scoring is kept as the gold standard. It can be used effectively in segregating benign from malignant nodules and is recommended for screening patients presenting with thyroid nodules.\nKeywords: Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thyroid Nodule","PeriodicalId":16486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BETHESDA SYSTEM AND ULTRASOUND-BASED TIRADS FOR REPORTING THYROID CYTOPATHOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"Ayesha Safdar, Raazia Mehmood, Maria Khan, Faryal Javaid, Ayesha Sajjad, Maria Tasneem Khattak, Iqbal Muhammad Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.52764/jms.24.32.1.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To correlate the screening ability of ultrasound-based TIRADS with the FNAC-based Bethesda system when the latter is kept as a gold standard.\\nMaterial and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Histopathology department, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 15th June 2022- 14th June 2023. A total of 363 patients from any age group of either gender diagnosed with thyroid nodules were included in the trial. All the participants underwent ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. TIRADS and Bethesda grading was done for each participant. Demographics and grading scores were recorded. Keeping Bethesda scoring as gold standard diagnostic performance of TIRADS grading was calculated.\\nResults: Mean age of the patients was 46.68 ± 12.28 years with a female-to-male ratio of 2.3:1.  TIRADS grading revealed 210 (69.8%) from TIRADS 2 while 70(82.4%), 12(50%), and 09(23.7%) patients were from TIRADS 3, 4 and 5 categories respectively. Bethesda grades were 301(82.9%), 21(5.8%), 09(2.5%), 28(7.7%), and 04(1.1%) from Bethesda 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories respectively. The sensitivity of the TIRADS was 93.8%, specificity 89.1%, positive predictive value 45%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 89.5%.\\nConclusion: TIRADS grading has a high diagnostic ability when Bethesda scoring is kept as the gold standard. It can be used effectively in segregating benign from malignant nodules and is recommended for screening patients presenting with thyroid nodules.\\nKeywords: Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thyroid Nodule\",\"PeriodicalId\":16486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.24.32.1.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52764/jms.24.32.1.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的将基于超声波的 TIRADS 系统与基于 FNAC 的 Bethesda 系统作为金标准,对后者的筛查能力进行对比:一项横断面研究于 2022 年 6 月 15 日至 2023 年 6 月 14 日在白沙瓦市雷曼医学研究所组织病理科进行。共有 363 名确诊患有甲状腺结节的男女患者参加了试验。所有参与者都接受了超声检查,然后在超声引导下对甲状腺结节进行细针穿刺。对每位参与者进行了 TIRADS 和贝塞斯达分级。人口统计学和分级评分均已记录。将贝塞斯达评分作为金标准,计算了 TIRADS 分级的诊断效果:患者的平均年龄为(46.68 ± 12.28)岁,男女比例为 2.3:1。 TIRADS 分级显示,210 例(69.8%)患者属于 TIRADS 2 级,70 例(82.4%)、12 例(50%)和 09 例(23.7%)患者分别属于 TIRADS 3、4 和 5 级。贝塞斯达分级分别为 301(82.9%)、21(5.8%)、09(2.5%)、28(7.7%)和 04(1.1%),分别来自贝塞斯达 2、3、4、5 和 6 级。TIRADS 的灵敏度为 93.8%,特异性为 89.1%,阳性预测值为 45%,阴性预测值为 99.3%,诊断准确率为 89.5%:结论:在以贝塞斯达评分为金标准的情况下,TIRADS 分级具有很高的诊断能力。结论:当贝塞斯达评分作为金标准时,TIRADS分级具有较高的诊断能力,可有效区分良性和恶性结节,建议用于甲状腺结节患者的筛查:活检 细针敏感性和特异性 甲状腺结节
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BETHESDA SYSTEM AND ULTRASOUND-BASED TIRADS FOR REPORTING THYROID CYTOPATHOLOGY
Objectives: To correlate the screening ability of ultrasound-based TIRADS with the FNAC-based Bethesda system when the latter is kept as a gold standard. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Histopathology department, Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar 15th June 2022- 14th June 2023. A total of 363 patients from any age group of either gender diagnosed with thyroid nodules were included in the trial. All the participants underwent ultrasound followed by ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. TIRADS and Bethesda grading was done for each participant. Demographics and grading scores were recorded. Keeping Bethesda scoring as gold standard diagnostic performance of TIRADS grading was calculated. Results: Mean age of the patients was 46.68 ± 12.28 years with a female-to-male ratio of 2.3:1.  TIRADS grading revealed 210 (69.8%) from TIRADS 2 while 70(82.4%), 12(50%), and 09(23.7%) patients were from TIRADS 3, 4 and 5 categories respectively. Bethesda grades were 301(82.9%), 21(5.8%), 09(2.5%), 28(7.7%), and 04(1.1%) from Bethesda 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories respectively. The sensitivity of the TIRADS was 93.8%, specificity 89.1%, positive predictive value 45%, negative predictive value 99.3%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 89.5%. Conclusion: TIRADS grading has a high diagnostic ability when Bethesda scoring is kept as the gold standard. It can be used effectively in segregating benign from malignant nodules and is recommended for screening patients presenting with thyroid nodules. Keywords: Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Sensitivity and Specificity, Thyroid Nodule
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信