南哥打巴托省科罗纳达尔市马贝尔圣母大学配电系统的保护系统

Layanth S. Sorzano
{"title":"南哥打巴托省科罗纳达尔市马贝尔圣母大学配电系统的保护系统","authors":"Layanth S. Sorzano","doi":"10.54476/ioer-imrj/980357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A vital instrument for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of electrical systems is the power system analysis. Protecting people and equipment from errors is part of this. These assessments examine the load, the equipment, and the foreseeable needs. A lack of short-circuit current protection can harm equipment and endanger workers. The main goal of this study is to assess if the various protection devices utilized in the Notre Dame of Marbel University’s Main Campus electrical system comply with the established standards. Through a real survey (opening panel boxes and reviewing the original Electrical Plan), the researcher will ascertain the various protection devices in operation. Two approaches are used to test for short circuits: the MVA method and the per-unit method. When determining fault current, only the three-phase fault is considered in the calculation since it is the one having the largest fault value. Aside from the mentioned, the transformer rating calculations were also done. The resulting data will then be compared to the actual protective devices installed in the building. Short circuit currents must be less than the Kilo Ampere Interrupting Capacity rating of the installed protective devices. In conclusion, after conducting a thorough analysis of the current loading schedule and comparing the results obtained through the MVA and per-unit methods, it is evident that the various installed Overcurrent Protective Devices are operating safely. The calculations revealed a substantial disparity of 35.57% between the two methods. Furthermore, the t-test conducted on paired data confirmed the statistical significance of the differences between these two approaches. With this, the researcher recommends conducting a separate study to verify branch circuit calculations, implementing primary metering, and prioritizing the rehabilitation of the Pantua and Alunan lines to enhance the safety and reliability of the electrical system, particularly in tracing complex branch circuits. Keywords: power system analysis, MVA method, per unit method, comparative analysis, Notre Dame of Marbel University","PeriodicalId":513304,"journal":{"name":"International Multidisciplinary Research Journal","volume":"80 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection System of the Electric Power Distribution System of Notre Dame of Marbel University, Koronadal City, South Cotabato\",\"authors\":\"Layanth S. Sorzano\",\"doi\":\"10.54476/ioer-imrj/980357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A vital instrument for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of electrical systems is the power system analysis. Protecting people and equipment from errors is part of this. These assessments examine the load, the equipment, and the foreseeable needs. A lack of short-circuit current protection can harm equipment and endanger workers. The main goal of this study is to assess if the various protection devices utilized in the Notre Dame of Marbel University’s Main Campus electrical system comply with the established standards. Through a real survey (opening panel boxes and reviewing the original Electrical Plan), the researcher will ascertain the various protection devices in operation. Two approaches are used to test for short circuits: the MVA method and the per-unit method. When determining fault current, only the three-phase fault is considered in the calculation since it is the one having the largest fault value. Aside from the mentioned, the transformer rating calculations were also done. The resulting data will then be compared to the actual protective devices installed in the building. Short circuit currents must be less than the Kilo Ampere Interrupting Capacity rating of the installed protective devices. In conclusion, after conducting a thorough analysis of the current loading schedule and comparing the results obtained through the MVA and per-unit methods, it is evident that the various installed Overcurrent Protective Devices are operating safely. The calculations revealed a substantial disparity of 35.57% between the two methods. Furthermore, the t-test conducted on paired data confirmed the statistical significance of the differences between these two approaches. With this, the researcher recommends conducting a separate study to verify branch circuit calculations, implementing primary metering, and prioritizing the rehabilitation of the Pantua and Alunan lines to enhance the safety and reliability of the electrical system, particularly in tracing complex branch circuits. Keywords: power system analysis, MVA method, per unit method, comparative analysis, Notre Dame of Marbel University\",\"PeriodicalId\":513304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Multidisciplinary Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Multidisciplinary Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/980357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Multidisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54476/ioer-imrj/980357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电力系统分析是评估电力系统有效性和安全性的重要工具。保护人员和设备不出错是其中的一部分。这些评估检查负载、设备和可预见的需求。缺乏短路电流保护会损坏设备并危及工人。本研究的主要目的是评估马贝尔圣母大学主校区电气系统中使用的各种保护装置是否符合既定标准。通过实际调查(打开配电箱并查看原始电气计划),研究人员将确定正在运行的各种保护装置。短路测试采用两种方法:MVA 法和单位法。在确定故障电流时,只考虑三相故障,因为它的故障值最大。除上述方法外,还进行了变压器额定值计算。计算得出的数据将与建筑内实际安装的保护装置进行比较。短路电流必须小于所安装保护装置的千安培额定分断能力。总之,在对电流负载表进行全面分析,并对通过 MVA 和单位方法得出的结果进行比较后,可以明显看出已安装的各种过流保护装置都在安全运行。计算结果显示,两种方法之间的差距高达 35.57%。此外,对配对数据进行的 t 检验证实了这两种方法之间差异的统计意义。有鉴于此,研究人员建议开展一项单独的研究来验证支路计算,实施一次计量,并优先修复 Pantua 和 Alunan 线路,以提高电力系统的安全性和可靠性,尤其是在追踪复杂的支路时。关键词:电力系统分析、MVA 法、单位法、比较分析、马贝尔圣母大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protection System of the Electric Power Distribution System of Notre Dame of Marbel University, Koronadal City, South Cotabato
A vital instrument for evaluating the effectiveness and safety of electrical systems is the power system analysis. Protecting people and equipment from errors is part of this. These assessments examine the load, the equipment, and the foreseeable needs. A lack of short-circuit current protection can harm equipment and endanger workers. The main goal of this study is to assess if the various protection devices utilized in the Notre Dame of Marbel University’s Main Campus electrical system comply with the established standards. Through a real survey (opening panel boxes and reviewing the original Electrical Plan), the researcher will ascertain the various protection devices in operation. Two approaches are used to test for short circuits: the MVA method and the per-unit method. When determining fault current, only the three-phase fault is considered in the calculation since it is the one having the largest fault value. Aside from the mentioned, the transformer rating calculations were also done. The resulting data will then be compared to the actual protective devices installed in the building. Short circuit currents must be less than the Kilo Ampere Interrupting Capacity rating of the installed protective devices. In conclusion, after conducting a thorough analysis of the current loading schedule and comparing the results obtained through the MVA and per-unit methods, it is evident that the various installed Overcurrent Protective Devices are operating safely. The calculations revealed a substantial disparity of 35.57% between the two methods. Furthermore, the t-test conducted on paired data confirmed the statistical significance of the differences between these two approaches. With this, the researcher recommends conducting a separate study to verify branch circuit calculations, implementing primary metering, and prioritizing the rehabilitation of the Pantua and Alunan lines to enhance the safety and reliability of the electrical system, particularly in tracing complex branch circuits. Keywords: power system analysis, MVA method, per unit method, comparative analysis, Notre Dame of Marbel University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信