{"title":"放牧流下双 Helmholtz 谐振器声学阻尼特性的数值研究","authors":"He Zhao, Dan Zhao, Xu Dong","doi":"10.1177/14613484241238596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the acoustic damping performances of the dual Helmholtz resonators were numerically evaluated using a 3D model. The grazing flow passes tangentially through the resonator neck, with a Mach number range of 0 ≤ Ma ≤ 0.1. The numerical model operates by solving the linearized Navier–Stokes equations. The current model is validated through a comparison with experimental data. The model is then utilized to explore the effects of the dual Helmholtz resonators on acoustic transmission loss performance in the presence of a grazing flow. Three key parameters are examined: 1) different implementation configurations of the dual Helmholtz resonators (including Models (b), (c), and (d)), 2) the mean temperature of the grazing flow, and 3) the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators. For comparison, the acoustic damping performance of these dual Helmholtz resonators is compared to the single Helmholtz resonator case (Model (a)). The maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is significantly higher, recording values of 91%, 89.4%, and 92.5% than those observed for Model (a) at Ma = 0, Ma = 0.05, and Ma = 0.1, respectively. It is observed that the dual Helmholtz resonators dramatically increase the transmission loss. Model (c) is demonstrated to be associated with the most significant damping on the acoustic plane waves in comparison with that of Model (a). Additionally, the maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is 23.23 dB, 30.32 dB, and 34.58 dB at mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K, respectively. Therefore, increasing the mean temperature is shown to be beneficial to enhance transmission losses in the presence of the grazing flow. Furthermore, under Ma = 0.1, the resonant frequency of Model (c) is 127 Hz, 152 Hz, and 172 Hz, corresponding to mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K. It can be concluded that increasing the temperature has the effect of broadening the resonant frequency, especially at a high grazing flow Mach number. However, increasing the mean temperature results in a reduction of transmission loss in the absence of the grazing flow. In the case of Model (c), a 32 cm axial distance results in a 5.6% larger transmission loss at Ma = 0 and a 26.4% larger loss at Ma = 0.1 compared to a 16 cm axial distance. This indicates that increasing the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators improves transmission loss.","PeriodicalId":504307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation on acoustic damping characteristics of dual Helmholtz resonators in presence of a grazing flow\",\"authors\":\"He Zhao, Dan Zhao, Xu Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14613484241238596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the acoustic damping performances of the dual Helmholtz resonators were numerically evaluated using a 3D model. The grazing flow passes tangentially through the resonator neck, with a Mach number range of 0 ≤ Ma ≤ 0.1. The numerical model operates by solving the linearized Navier–Stokes equations. The current model is validated through a comparison with experimental data. The model is then utilized to explore the effects of the dual Helmholtz resonators on acoustic transmission loss performance in the presence of a grazing flow. Three key parameters are examined: 1) different implementation configurations of the dual Helmholtz resonators (including Models (b), (c), and (d)), 2) the mean temperature of the grazing flow, and 3) the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators. For comparison, the acoustic damping performance of these dual Helmholtz resonators is compared to the single Helmholtz resonator case (Model (a)). The maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is significantly higher, recording values of 91%, 89.4%, and 92.5% than those observed for Model (a) at Ma = 0, Ma = 0.05, and Ma = 0.1, respectively. It is observed that the dual Helmholtz resonators dramatically increase the transmission loss. Model (c) is demonstrated to be associated with the most significant damping on the acoustic plane waves in comparison with that of Model (a). Additionally, the maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is 23.23 dB, 30.32 dB, and 34.58 dB at mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K, respectively. Therefore, increasing the mean temperature is shown to be beneficial to enhance transmission losses in the presence of the grazing flow. Furthermore, under Ma = 0.1, the resonant frequency of Model (c) is 127 Hz, 152 Hz, and 172 Hz, corresponding to mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K. It can be concluded that increasing the temperature has the effect of broadening the resonant frequency, especially at a high grazing flow Mach number. However, increasing the mean temperature results in a reduction of transmission loss in the absence of the grazing flow. In the case of Model (c), a 32 cm axial distance results in a 5.6% larger transmission loss at Ma = 0 and a 26.4% larger loss at Ma = 0.1 compared to a 16 cm axial distance. This indicates that increasing the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators improves transmission loss.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484241238596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484241238596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究使用三维模型对双赫尔姆霍兹谐振器的声学阻尼性能进行了数值评估。掠过流从谐振器颈部切向穿过,马赫数范围为 0 ≤ Ma ≤ 0.1。数值模型通过求解线性化的纳维-斯托克斯方程运行。通过与实验数据的对比,对当前模型进行了验证。然后,利用该模型探讨了双 Helmholtz 谐振器对掠过流情况下声波传输损耗性能的影响。研究了三个关键参数1)双亥姆霍兹谐振器的不同实施配置(包括模型 (b)、(c) 和 (d));2)掠流的平均温度;3)双亥姆霍兹谐振器之间的轴向距离。为了进行比较,将这些双亥姆霍兹谐振器的声学阻尼性能与单亥姆霍兹谐振器情况(模型(a))进行比较。在 Ma = 0、Ma = 0.05 和 Ma = 0.1 时,模型(c)的最大传输损耗明显高于模型(a),分别达到 91%、89.4% 和 92.5%。据观察,双亥姆霍兹谐振器大大增加了传输损耗。与模型(a)相比,模型(c)对平面声波的阻尼最为显著。此外,在平均温度为 300 K、600 K 和 900 K 时,模型 (c) 的最大传输损耗分别为 23.23 dB、30.32 dB 和 34.58 dB。因此,提高平均温度有利于增加放牧流存在时的传输损耗。此外,在 Ma = 0.1 条件下,模型 (c) 的谐振频率分别为 127 Hz、152 Hz 和 172 Hz,对应的平均温度分别为 300 K、600 K 和 900 K。然而,在没有掠入流的情况下,提高平均温度会导致传输损耗减少。在模型 (c) 中,与 16 厘米的轴向距离相比,32 厘米的轴向距离导致 Ma = 0 时的传输损耗增加 5.6%,Ma = 0.1 时的传输损耗增加 26.4%。这表明,增加双 Helmholtz 谐振器之间的轴向距离可以改善传输损耗。
Numerical investigation on acoustic damping characteristics of dual Helmholtz resonators in presence of a grazing flow
In this study, the acoustic damping performances of the dual Helmholtz resonators were numerically evaluated using a 3D model. The grazing flow passes tangentially through the resonator neck, with a Mach number range of 0 ≤ Ma ≤ 0.1. The numerical model operates by solving the linearized Navier–Stokes equations. The current model is validated through a comparison with experimental data. The model is then utilized to explore the effects of the dual Helmholtz resonators on acoustic transmission loss performance in the presence of a grazing flow. Three key parameters are examined: 1) different implementation configurations of the dual Helmholtz resonators (including Models (b), (c), and (d)), 2) the mean temperature of the grazing flow, and 3) the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators. For comparison, the acoustic damping performance of these dual Helmholtz resonators is compared to the single Helmholtz resonator case (Model (a)). The maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is significantly higher, recording values of 91%, 89.4%, and 92.5% than those observed for Model (a) at Ma = 0, Ma = 0.05, and Ma = 0.1, respectively. It is observed that the dual Helmholtz resonators dramatically increase the transmission loss. Model (c) is demonstrated to be associated with the most significant damping on the acoustic plane waves in comparison with that of Model (a). Additionally, the maximum transmission loss of Model (c) is 23.23 dB, 30.32 dB, and 34.58 dB at mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K, respectively. Therefore, increasing the mean temperature is shown to be beneficial to enhance transmission losses in the presence of the grazing flow. Furthermore, under Ma = 0.1, the resonant frequency of Model (c) is 127 Hz, 152 Hz, and 172 Hz, corresponding to mean temperatures of 300 K, 600 K, and 900 K. It can be concluded that increasing the temperature has the effect of broadening the resonant frequency, especially at a high grazing flow Mach number. However, increasing the mean temperature results in a reduction of transmission loss in the absence of the grazing flow. In the case of Model (c), a 32 cm axial distance results in a 5.6% larger transmission loss at Ma = 0 and a 26.4% larger loss at Ma = 0.1 compared to a 16 cm axial distance. This indicates that increasing the axial distance between the dual Helmholtz resonators improves transmission loss.