Andrea Patzer, Julia Kowalski, Tommaso Di Rocco, Andreas Pack
{"title":"紫云英母体的灾难性破裂:碎片大小的模型约束","authors":"Andrea Patzer, Julia Kowalski, Tommaso Di Rocco, Andreas Pack","doi":"10.1111/maps.14155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ureilite parent body (UPB) was, in all likelihood, completely broken apart when hit by another object early in its history and reassembled into daughter bodies. We here present a study tailored to constrain the dimensions of the impact debris produced in the catastrophic disruption. Using a customized Python code to simulate the thermal evolution of the UPB fragments, we compared the FeO profiles modeled for different depths within those fragments with those measured across the reduction rims in olivines of 12 different ureilites (<i>n</i> = 37). Our profile data were fitted to the theoretical cooling profiles determined with a transient thermal model. The results are coherent and consistent with earlier studies and, despite using simplified boundary conditions (fragments described as ideal spheres and maximum radiation), our data provide valuable context on possible cooling pathways of the UPB debris. In detail, we found that the average depths within the given fragments from which our samples of ureilites originated were limited to 0.3–0.4 ± 0.1 m, with only few exceptions (e.g., one highly reduced sample lacked suitable reduction profiles suggesting either a depth of origin of >2 m or shielding of this fragment from rapid cooling, e.g., due to hovering in the center of a relatively dense cloud of debris). In addition, we calculated that the cooling from 1473 to 1100 K of the average fragment at the depth of our samples took no more than 3–4 days, suggesting that the reassembly of the ureilite daughter bodies could have been a very fast process.</p>","PeriodicalId":18555,"journal":{"name":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","volume":"59 6","pages":"1407-1420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14155","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The catastrophic break-up of the ureilite parent body: Modeling constraints on the debris size\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Patzer, Julia Kowalski, Tommaso Di Rocco, Andreas Pack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/maps.14155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ureilite parent body (UPB) was, in all likelihood, completely broken apart when hit by another object early in its history and reassembled into daughter bodies. We here present a study tailored to constrain the dimensions of the impact debris produced in the catastrophic disruption. Using a customized Python code to simulate the thermal evolution of the UPB fragments, we compared the FeO profiles modeled for different depths within those fragments with those measured across the reduction rims in olivines of 12 different ureilites (<i>n</i> = 37). Our profile data were fitted to the theoretical cooling profiles determined with a transient thermal model. The results are coherent and consistent with earlier studies and, despite using simplified boundary conditions (fragments described as ideal spheres and maximum radiation), our data provide valuable context on possible cooling pathways of the UPB debris. In detail, we found that the average depths within the given fragments from which our samples of ureilites originated were limited to 0.3–0.4 ± 0.1 m, with only few exceptions (e.g., one highly reduced sample lacked suitable reduction profiles suggesting either a depth of origin of >2 m or shielding of this fragment from rapid cooling, e.g., due to hovering in the center of a relatively dense cloud of debris). In addition, we calculated that the cooling from 1473 to 1100 K of the average fragment at the depth of our samples took no more than 3–4 days, suggesting that the reassembly of the ureilite daughter bodies could have been a very fast process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"1407-1420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/maps.14155\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteoritics & Planetary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteoritics & Planetary Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/maps.14155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ureilite母体(UPB)很可能在其历史早期被另一个天体撞击时完全碎裂,然后重新组装成子体。我们在此介绍一项研究,旨在确定灾难性破坏过程中产生的撞击碎片的尺寸。我们使用定制的Python代码来模拟UPB碎片的热演化,并将这些碎片内部不同深度的氧化铁剖面与在12个不同脲榴石(n = 37)橄榄石的还原边缘测量到的氧化铁剖面进行了比较。我们的剖面数据与通过瞬态热模型确定的理论冷却剖面进行了拟合。尽管使用了简化的边界条件(碎片被描述为理想球体和最大辐射),我们的数据还是为 UPB 碎片可能的冷却路径提供了有价值的背景资料。具体而言,我们发现,我们的尿锂石样本所来自的特定碎片的平均深度仅限于 0.3-0.4 ± 0.1 米,只有少数例外(例如,一个高度还原的样本缺乏合适的还原剖面,这表明其起源深度大于 2 米,或者由于悬停在相对密集的碎片云中心等原因,该碎片受到了快速冷却的屏蔽)。此外,根据我们的计算,在我们的样本深度,平均碎片从 1473 K 冷却到 1100 K 的时间不超过 3-4 天,这表明脲石子体的重新组合可能是一个非常快速的过程。
The catastrophic break-up of the ureilite parent body: Modeling constraints on the debris size
The ureilite parent body (UPB) was, in all likelihood, completely broken apart when hit by another object early in its history and reassembled into daughter bodies. We here present a study tailored to constrain the dimensions of the impact debris produced in the catastrophic disruption. Using a customized Python code to simulate the thermal evolution of the UPB fragments, we compared the FeO profiles modeled for different depths within those fragments with those measured across the reduction rims in olivines of 12 different ureilites (n = 37). Our profile data were fitted to the theoretical cooling profiles determined with a transient thermal model. The results are coherent and consistent with earlier studies and, despite using simplified boundary conditions (fragments described as ideal spheres and maximum radiation), our data provide valuable context on possible cooling pathways of the UPB debris. In detail, we found that the average depths within the given fragments from which our samples of ureilites originated were limited to 0.3–0.4 ± 0.1 m, with only few exceptions (e.g., one highly reduced sample lacked suitable reduction profiles suggesting either a depth of origin of >2 m or shielding of this fragment from rapid cooling, e.g., due to hovering in the center of a relatively dense cloud of debris). In addition, we calculated that the cooling from 1473 to 1100 K of the average fragment at the depth of our samples took no more than 3–4 days, suggesting that the reassembly of the ureilite daughter bodies could have been a very fast process.
期刊介绍:
First issued in 1953, the journal publishes research articles describing the latest results of new studies, invited reviews of major topics in planetary science, editorials on issues of current interest in the field, and book reviews. The publications are original, not considered for publication elsewhere, and undergo peer-review. The topics include the origin and history of the solar system, planets and natural satellites, interplanetary dust and interstellar medium, lunar samples, meteors, and meteorites, asteroids, comets, craters, and tektites. Our authors and editors are professional scientists representing numerous disciplines, including astronomy, astrophysics, physics, geophysics, chemistry, isotope geochemistry, mineralogy, earth science, geology, and biology. MAPS has subscribers in over 40 countries. Fifty percent of MAPS'' readers are based outside the USA. The journal is available in hard copy and online.