单段翻修前交叉韧带重建术的中期效果:对 36 例病例的回顾性分析。

A. S. Gofer, Aleksandr A. Alekperov, M. B. Gurazhev, A.K. Avdeev, V. Lukinov, Dmitriy V. Rubtsov, V. V. Pavlov
{"title":"单段翻修前交叉韧带重建术的中期效果:对 36 例病例的回顾性分析。","authors":"A. S. Gofer, Aleksandr A. Alekperov, M. B. Gurazhev, A.K. Avdeev, V. Lukinov, Dmitriy V. Rubtsov, V. V. Pavlov","doi":"10.17816/2311-2905-17415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is becoming an increasingly common knee surgery procedure due to the annual increase in the number of primary ACL reconstructions performed. Graft choice and determining the stages of surgical treatment using a preoperative assessment of the possibility of performing the most anatomical revision tunnels and their relative position with the primary tunnels are the main factors that influence the results of treatment. \nAim of the study – сomparative assessment of the results of using autografts from the hamstring tendons and the peroneus longus tendon as part of a one-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. \nMaterial and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction. The study group \"PLT\" (n=19) - patients with an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon and the comparison group - \"HT\" (n=17) - a graft from the hamstring tendons. Subjective and objective assessments were carried out using the KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scales. the position of the central entry points into the primary and revision canals was also determined and assessed. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the objective assessment of knee stability. Significantly better results of subjective assessment of knee joint function using the Lysholm and KOOS scales were obtained in the PLT group (p=0.042 and p0.001, respectively). The position of the revision tunnels corresponded to the standard values, however, the position of the femoral tunnel had a slight displacement cranially and anteriorly. It was also revealed that the diameter of the PLT graft was statistically significantly larger than the HT graft (p0.001). \nConclusion. One-stage revision ACL reconstruction is a safe and effective surgical procedure that provides satisfactory objective and subjective clinical results. The use of an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon provides better results compared to a graft from the hamstring tendons.","PeriodicalId":503807,"journal":{"name":"Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia","volume":"28 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MID-TERM RESULTS OF SINGLE-STAGE REVISION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 36 CASES.\",\"authors\":\"A. S. Gofer, Aleksandr A. Alekperov, M. B. Gurazhev, A.K. Avdeev, V. Lukinov, Dmitriy V. Rubtsov, V. V. Pavlov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/2311-2905-17415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is becoming an increasingly common knee surgery procedure due to the annual increase in the number of primary ACL reconstructions performed. Graft choice and determining the stages of surgical treatment using a preoperative assessment of the possibility of performing the most anatomical revision tunnels and their relative position with the primary tunnels are the main factors that influence the results of treatment. \\nAim of the study – сomparative assessment of the results of using autografts from the hamstring tendons and the peroneus longus tendon as part of a one-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. \\nMaterial and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction. The study group \\\"PLT\\\" (n=19) - patients with an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon and the comparison group - \\\"HT\\\" (n=17) - a graft from the hamstring tendons. Subjective and objective assessments were carried out using the KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scales. the position of the central entry points into the primary and revision canals was also determined and assessed. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the objective assessment of knee stability. Significantly better results of subjective assessment of knee joint function using the Lysholm and KOOS scales were obtained in the PLT group (p=0.042 and p0.001, respectively). The position of the revision tunnels corresponded to the standard values, however, the position of the femoral tunnel had a slight displacement cranially and anteriorly. It was also revealed that the diameter of the PLT graft was statistically significantly larger than the HT graft (p0.001). \\nConclusion. One-stage revision ACL reconstruction is a safe and effective surgical procedure that provides satisfactory objective and subjective clinical results. The use of an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon provides better results compared to a graft from the hamstring tendons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia\",\"volume\":\"28 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。由于原发性前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术的数量逐年增加,前交叉韧带翻修重建术正逐渐成为一种常见的膝关节外科手术。影响治疗效果的主要因素包括:移植材料的选择,以及通过术前评估确定手术治疗的阶段,评估是否有可能实施最符合解剖学的翻修隧道,以及翻修隧道与原发性隧道的相对位置。研究目的--比较评估使用腘绳肌腱和腓骨长肌腱自体移植物作为前交叉韧带一期翻修重建的一部分的效果。材料和方法。对 36 名接受前交叉韧带翻修重建术的患者进行了回顾性分析。研究组 "PLT"(人数=19)--采用腓骨长肌腱自体移植物的患者,对比组 "HT"(人数=17)--采用腘绳肌腱移植物的患者。使用 KOOS、IKDC 和 Lysholm 量表进行了主观和客观评估。还确定并评估了原发和翻修管道中心入口的位置。结果。膝关节稳定性的客观评估结果在统计学上没有明显差异。使用 Lysholm 和 KOOS 量表对膝关节功能进行主观评估的结果显示,PLT 组明显更好(分别为 p=0.042 和 p0.001)。翻修隧道的位置与标准值相符,但股骨隧道的位置向头颅和前方略有移位。研究还发现,PLT移植物的直径在统计学上明显大于HT移植物(P0.001)。结论一期修复前交叉韧带重建术是一种安全有效的手术方法,可提供令人满意的主客观临床效果。使用腓骨长肌肌腱自体移植物比使用腘绳肌肌腱移植物效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MID-TERM RESULTS OF SINGLE-STAGE REVISION ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 36 CASES.
Background. Revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is becoming an increasingly common knee surgery procedure due to the annual increase in the number of primary ACL reconstructions performed. Graft choice and determining the stages of surgical treatment using a preoperative assessment of the possibility of performing the most anatomical revision tunnels and their relative position with the primary tunnels are the main factors that influence the results of treatment. Aim of the study – сomparative assessment of the results of using autografts from the hamstring tendons and the peroneus longus tendon as part of a one-stage revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 36 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction. The study group "PLT" (n=19) - patients with an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon and the comparison group - "HT" (n=17) - a graft from the hamstring tendons. Subjective and objective assessments were carried out using the KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scales. the position of the central entry points into the primary and revision canals was also determined and assessed. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the objective assessment of knee stability. Significantly better results of subjective assessment of knee joint function using the Lysholm and KOOS scales were obtained in the PLT group (p=0.042 and p0.001, respectively). The position of the revision tunnels corresponded to the standard values, however, the position of the femoral tunnel had a slight displacement cranially and anteriorly. It was also revealed that the diameter of the PLT graft was statistically significantly larger than the HT graft (p0.001). Conclusion. One-stage revision ACL reconstruction is a safe and effective surgical procedure that provides satisfactory objective and subjective clinical results. The use of an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon provides better results compared to a graft from the hamstring tendons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信