{"title":"普通话中的动作参照结构与词汇灵活性类型学","authors":"Liwei Gong, Satoshi Uehara","doi":"10.1075/sl.23010.gon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects\n of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the\n Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,\n productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,\n and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.\n Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the\n privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Liwei Gong, Satoshi Uehara\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sl.23010.gon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects\\n of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the\\n Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,\\n productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,\\n and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.\\n Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the\\n privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23010.gon\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23010.gon","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility
The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects
of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the
Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,
productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,
and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.
Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the
privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.