普通话中的动作参照结构与词汇灵活性类型学

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Liwei Gong, Satoshi Uehara
{"title":"普通话中的动作参照结构与词汇灵活性类型学","authors":"Liwei Gong, Satoshi Uehara","doi":"10.1075/sl.23010.gon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects\n of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the\n Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,\n productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,\n and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.\n Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the\n privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility\",\"authors\":\"Liwei Gong, Satoshi Uehara\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/sl.23010.gon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects\\n of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the\\n Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,\\n productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,\\n and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.\\n Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the\\n privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23010.gon\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23010.gon","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汉语普通话(以下简称 "汉语")中的语篇系统和词汇灵活性一直以来都是争论的话题,原因在于动作参照结构的零编码现象非常普遍。在本文中,我们从激进构式语法(Croft 2001, 2022)的角度分析了汉语动作参照构式的属性,重点关注其结构编码、行为潜力、生产率和语义转换。我们还讨论了有可能加强汉语词汇灵活性的类型学特征,以及汉语的特定语言属性对跨语言语篇讨论的影响。具体地说,汉语中最灵活的信息包装功能是指称而不是谓词,这对以往关于语篇和词汇灵活性的研究中确立的谓词的特权地位提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility
The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential, productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese, and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech. Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信